<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; double dissolution election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/double-dissolution-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Antony Green: Why Rudd shouldn&#8217;t call a Double Dissolution</title>
		<link>http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2010/05/how-the-senate-coul-look-after-a-double-dissolution.html</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2010/05/how-the-senate-coul-look-after-a-double-dissolution.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 02:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=135852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A double dissolution election may weaken the Coalition's power in the Senate, but it probably wouldn't strengthen the ALP's, says <b>Antony Green</b>. Instead, the spoils would go to the Greens.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2010/05/how-the-senate-coul-look-after-a-double-dissolution.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antony Green: The little ETS that couldn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2010/05/is-the-rudd-governments-ets-legislation-a-double-dissolution-trigger.html</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2010/05/is-the-rudd-governments-ets-legislation-a-double-dissolution-trigger.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 02:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=135477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically, the ETS legislation was a double dissolution trigger. So why didn't Kevin Rudd pull the trigger? Because only the original ETS -- not the amended version -- could be used and that wasn't helpful to anyone, explains <b>Antony Green</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2010/05/is-the-rudd-governments-ets-legislation-a-double-dissolution-trigger.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd&#8217;s a coward? You&#8217;re an idiot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2010/05/01/cowards_and_idiots/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2010/05/01/cowards_and_idiots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 11:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Possum Comitatus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reckon Rudd’s backflip on the ETS and his unwillingness to fight a double dissolution makes him a wuss? Prepare for an onslaught of truth bombs on policy implementation timelines, Senate maths and the electoral clock from <b>Possum Comitatus</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2010/05/01/cowards_and_idiots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atkins: The date of the federal election is&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/october-federal-election-odds-on/story-e6frerff-1225853402775</link>
		<comments>http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/october-federal-election-odds-on/story-e6frerff-1225853402775#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=130321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A double dissolution election isn't going to happen, but Rudd will want the federal election done well before the Victorian on in November. <b>Dennis Atkins</b> places his bets for the exact election date.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/october-federal-election-odds-on/story-e6frerff-1225853402775/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antony Green: Rudd will play the double dissolution card</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/08/2867633.htm?site=thedrum</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/08/2867633.htm?site=thedrum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=129295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To stop the blockage in the Senate, Rudd will probably call a double dissolution election for August or early September, argues <b>Antony Green</b> as he explains the historical reasons for Rudd's timing issues.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/08/2867633.htm?site=thedrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd navigates the thicket of early election timing</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/23/rudd-navigates-the-thicket-of-early-election-timing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/23/rudd-navigates-the-thicket-of-early-election-timing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Richardson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harold holt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john gorton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert menzies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=118624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rudd is a natural conservative, a low-risk player, and early elections are a risky strategy. If Rudd decides that the advantages of boosting the minor party strength in the Senate outweigh the disadvantages, he can do it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/23/rudd-navigates-the-thicket-of-early-election-timing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget &#8216;Sorry&#8217;, what are the Libs going to do about WorkChoices?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/05/forget-sorry-what-are-the-libs-going-to-do-about-workchoices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/05/forget-sorry-what-are-the-libs-going-to-do-about-workchoices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate donors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election debacle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal mps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter backlash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberal MPs will hold a two-day election post mortem and way-forward strategy meeting in Canberra starting tomorrow with most media attention focused on their differences over Labor’s “Sorry” declaration. But what about WorkChoices? asks <b>Alex Mitchell</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/05/forget-sorry-what-are-the-libs-going-to-do-about-workchoices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the new Senate powerbrokers are &#8230; the Nationals</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/22/and-the-new-senate-powerbrokers-are-the-nationals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/22/and-the-new-senate-powerbrokers-are-the-nationals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lock stock and barrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Xenophon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorkChoices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barnaby Joyce got jumped on earlier in the week when he told <i>The Australian</i>: "I really am struggling now to work out how Labor’s stance is that different from WorkChoices". But why aren’t his other comments from the same story being examined more closely? Christian Kerr investigates.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/22/and-the-new-senate-powerbrokers-are-the-nationals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political bite-sized meaty chunks</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/15/political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/15/political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ominous silence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Costello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queensland university of technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thesis title]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howard and Costello: a difference of opinion ... Silence on academic censorship ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/15/political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 824/930 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 08:09:15 -->
