<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; defamation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/defamation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Journalists beware: rumours in cyberspace may ruin credibility</title>
		<link>http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-23676132-details/Health+warning%3A+rumours+in+cyberspace+may+seriously+damage+your+credibility/article.do</link>
		<comments>http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-23676132-details/Health+warning%3A+rumours+in+cyberspace+may+seriously+damage+your+credibility/article.do#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=51575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Mark Twain said, writing long before the arrival of the internet, a lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth has its trousers on.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-23676132-details/Health+warning%3A+rumours+in+cyberspace+may+seriously+damage+your+credibility/article.do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faris: why I don&#8217;t want a Crikey blog</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/03/faris-why-i-dont-want-a-crikey-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/03/faris-why-i-dont-want-a-crikey-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racial vilification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am as thick-skinned as the next commentator, probably more so, but there is no point in having dialogue with people who have a visceral hatred for you personally, writes <b>Peter Faris</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/03/faris-why-i-dont-want-a-crikey-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A victory for journalism, but with a pinch of salt</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/17/a-victory-for-journalism-but-with-a-pinch-of-salt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/17/a-victory-for-journalism-but-with-a-pinch-of-salt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macquarie Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macquarie Bank’s protracted defamation case against the The Australian over a 2005 article about the bank’s involvement with the Beaconsfield Mine has been dismissed with costs, writes <b>Chris Paver</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/17/a-victory-for-journalism-but-with-a-pinch-of-salt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Whirlpool of &#8220;injurious falsehood&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/13/a-whirlpool-of-injurious-falsehood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/13/a-whirlpool-of-injurious-falsehood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsehood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whirlpool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a legal case unfolding in Queensland, against Simon Wright, the host of a popular IT blogsite called Whirlpool, that every blogger should keep a watching brief over as it could set an unpleasant precedent for freedom of speech.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/13/a-whirlpool-of-injurious-falsehood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New uniform defamation code calms litigants</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/13/new-uniform-defamation-code-calms-litigants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/13/new-uniform-defamation-code-calms-litigants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gangland killings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minter Ellison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious cults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sydney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing but true. <i>The Age</i> newspaper has received just one writ for defamation in the last 18 months. How could this be? In the same period the paper has seen a resurgence in investigative reporting and some gutsy sleuthing on gangland killings and religious cults.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/13/new-uniform-defamation-code-calms-litigants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
