<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Conde Nast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/conde-nast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is working for Anna Wintour really that bad?</title>
		<link>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/04/so_what_really_happens_after_y.html</link>
		<comments>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/04/so_what_really_happens_after_y.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 02:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Wintour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graydon Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=135097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is life as <em>Vogue</em> editor Anna Wintour's assistant as hellish as <em>The Devil Wears Prada</em> makes it out to be? And what about working for other Condé Nast editors? <em>New York mag</em> tracks down some former assistants who "escaped".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/04/so_what_really_happens_after_y.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rival publishers unite to create iTunes for magazines &#8212; but who&#8217;s buying?</title>
		<link>http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/11/time_conde_hearst_to_create_an_itunes_for_magazines.php</link>
		<comments>http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/11/time_conde_hearst_to_create_an_itunes_for_magazines.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=101162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Magazine publishers Hearst, Time Inc and Conde Nast are joining forces to create an "iTunes for magazines" -- a online storefront for digital versions of their titles and articles. But they can't sell a product that's already free... are those paywalls we can see looming on the horizon?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/11/time_conde_hearst_to_create_an_itunes_for_magazines.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Yorker: too big to fail?</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/last-magazine-standing</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/last-magazine-standing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Yorker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=98552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While other magazines are shrinking and downsizing, <em>The New Yorker</em> has remained entirely intact, even despite <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/conde-nast/">its publisher's financial woes</a>. What's the magazine's secret? It may have something to do with its 60-plus team of staff writers...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/last-magazine-standing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The last days of Gourmet</title>
		<link>http://www.lastdaysofgourmet.com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lastdaysofgourmet.com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gourmet magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo galleries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=97154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former associate art director of the now-defunct <em>Gourmet</em> magazine has put up this online photo gallery to document the final days in the publication's now-empty offices. How thoroughly depressing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lastdaysofgourmet.com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Wired survive the Condé carnage?</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5382805/unwiring-wired</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5382805/unwiring-wired#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=93346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Gawker</em> assesses the shaky future of tech-bible <em>Wired</em>. Faced with sinking ad sales, major staff cuts and losses, and at the mercy of <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/conde-nast/">an ailing publisher</a>, how much longer can the mag and its website cling on?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5382805/unwiring-wired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost-cutting carnage at Condé Nast: four mags to fold</title>
		<link>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/conde-nast-to-close-gourmet-magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/conde-nast-to-close-gourmet-magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gourmet magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=91173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publisher <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28conde.html?_r=1">Condé Nast</a> (<em>GQ</em>, <em>Vogue</em>, <em>Vanity Fair</em>) is trimming the fat of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28conde.html">bloated</a> magazine empire, and the first victims are <em>Cookie</em>, <em>Modern Bride</em>, <em>Elegant Bride</em> and, most notably, foodie bible <em>Gourmet</em>. The latter's closure has <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aRzYK_GptIcw">been labeled</a> "an American tragedy". But <a href="http://food.theatlantic.com/corbys-fresh-feeds/dont-rip-gourmet-come-back-soon.php">is this really the end</a>?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/conde-nast-to-close-gourmet-magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conde Nast tightens its (hand-made, designer, anaconda leather) belt</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28conde.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28conde.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=89587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publisher Conde Nast (<em>GQ</em>, <em>Vogue</em>, <em>Vanity Fair</em>) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1996/06/16/magazine/the-big-city-masochism-central.html">is well known</a> for its <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2210367">culture</a> of extravagance and indulgence -- but even Anna Wintour isn't immune to the media downturn, and the time has come to cut some costs. Can Conde keep the class without chauffeurs and caviar?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28conde.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year&#8217;s most powerful fashion mag editors</title>
		<link>http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/04/powerful-fashion-editors-lifestyle-style-anna-wintour.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/04/powerful-fashion-editors-lifestyle-style-anna-wintour.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Wintour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=85184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Forbes</em> look at this year's power players in the fashion press for 2009, a year where <em>The September Issue</em>, <em>Project Runway</em> and <em>America's Next Top Model</em> all shook up the movers and shakers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/04/powerful-fashion-editors-lifestyle-style-anna-wintour.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Censorship and cowardice at Conde Nast</title>
		<link>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364</link>
		<comments>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KGB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vladimir putin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publisher Conde Nast has buried a story from <em>GQ</em> on possible connections between Vladimir Putin, the KGB and a series of 1999 bombings officially blamed on Chechen terrorists, keeping the piece off the web and out of Russia, for fear of reprisals. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conde Nast&#8217;s attempt to keep quiet just turns up the volume</title>
		<link>http://neteffect.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/09/04/conde_nast_hit_by_the_streisand_effect</link>
		<comments>http://neteffect.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/09/04/conde_nast_hit_by_the_streisand_effect#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364">censored</a> <em>GQ</em> article linking the KGB and a series of 1999 bombings wouldn't have even made headlines in Russia, says <b>Evgeny Morozov</b>. Of course, it probably will <em>now</em>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://neteffect.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/09/04/conde_nast_hit_by_the_streisand_effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media says &#8220;Nyet!&#8221; to self-censorship</title>
		<link>http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/09/selfcensorship-went-out-with-denim-vests.html</link>
		<comments>http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/09/selfcensorship-went-out-with-denim-vests.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While magazine publisher Conde Nast's attempts --and initial success -- in censoring a story in <em>GQ</em> magazine are troubling, but it's at least reassuring that <em>GQ</em>'s editors didn't take it lying down, says <b>Julian Sanchez</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/09/selfcensorship-went-out-with-denim-vests.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker translate censored story into Russian</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5352827/------gq---</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5352827/------gq---#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KGB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outraged at <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364">revelations</a> that <em>GQ</em> buried a story linking Vladimir Putin to a series of 1999 bombings to keep it out of Russia, <em>Gawker</em> has rallied its readership to translate the article into Russian and spread it online.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5352827/------gq---/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The golden age of Condé Nast comes to an end</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/gilded-age-conde-nast-over</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/gilded-age-conde-nast-over#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=79695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recession is hitting elite publishing house Condé Nast (responsible for <em>Vogue</em>, <em>GQ</em> and <em>The New Yorker</em> amongst others) hard: no free sodas, no pedicures for clients, and editors forced to eat lunch in the Frank Gehry-designed cafeteria. <em>Quelle horreur</em>!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/gilded-age-conde-nast-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swine Flu: now in Vogue</title>
		<link>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/06/swine_flu_hits_vogue.html</link>
		<comments>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/06/swine_flu_hits_vogue.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=63559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Condé Nast employees have received a memo informing them that an "employee working on the 12th floor at 4 Times Square" -- home of <em>Vogue</em> magazine -- has tested positive for Influenza A. Will surgical masks be next season's look?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/06/swine_flu_hits_vogue.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A magazine dream factory turns sour</title>
		<link>http://nymag.com/news/media/57076/</link>
		<comments>http://nymag.com/news/media/57076/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=63372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last two years, Si Newhouse Jr, chairman of Condé Nast, has had to close <em>Jane</em>, <em>House &#038; Garden</em>, <em>Men’s Vogue</em> and now <em>Portfolio</em>. Who next?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nymag.com/news/media/57076/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Annie Leibovitz facing bankruptcy?</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5266329/will-annie-leibovitz-be-forced-into-bankruptcy</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5266329/will-annie-leibovitz-be-forced-into-bankruptcy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annie Leibovitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=61281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An involuntary bankruptcy petition is set to be filed against celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz, claiming she owes $189,00. If successful, her entire photographic archive could be taken.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5266329/will-annie-leibovitz-be-forced-into-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portofolio.com back from the dead</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/portfoliocom-officially-resurrected</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/portfoliocom-officially-resurrected#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 02:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American City Business Journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=60461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The website of defunct businses mag <i>Portfolio</i> has been brought back to life after Condé Nast transferred full control of its content to a new publisher.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/portfoliocom-officially-resurrected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Portfolio folded</title>
		<link>http://www.slate.com/id/2217020/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slate.com/id/2217020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=54015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Condé Nast's business magazine, <i>Portfolio</i> has closed; <i>Slate</i> lists four reasons why.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/id/2217020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1319/1523 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 21:47:30 -->
