<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; climate policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/climate-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ghosts of climate policy past haunt our Clean Energy Future</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/07/cef-clean-energy-future-legislation-through-parliament/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/07/cef-clean-energy-future-legislation-through-parliament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Milne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy and science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=245576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s an old refrain, but the closer we get to the Clean Energy Future legislation ducking and weaving its way through parliament, the more we are reminded of the ghosts of the current proposal’s stepmother, the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b> of <a href="http://www.climatespectator.com.au" target="_blank"><em>Climate Spectator</em></a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/07/cef-clean-energy-future-legislation-through-parliament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From little things&#8230;What the scaled-down US climate debate means</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/02/from-little-things-what-the-scaled-down-us-climate-debate-means/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/02/from-little-things-what-the-scaled-down-us-climate-debate-means/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 03:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=160356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Senate has taken Americans on an energy and climate roller coaster over the past year as Senators John Kerry, Joe Lieberman, and others attempted to craft legislation that would increase investment in clean energy while cutting global warming pollution.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/02/from-little-things-what-the-scaled-down-us-climate-debate-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No carbon price? You&#8217;re being conned</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/12/on-climate-change-politicians-think-youre-stupid-and-youre-paying-for-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/12/on-climate-change-politicians-think-youre-stupid-and-youre-paying-for-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 03:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=152210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you can put aside the high and rising costs of failing to commence Australia's transition from one of the world's biggest carbon addicts to a low-carbon economy aside, our handling of climate policy has been the stuff of priceless comedy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/12/on-climate-change-politicians-think-youre-stupid-and-youre-paying-for-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>168</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate and environment: not much in the way of policy direction</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/12/climate-and-environment-not-much-in-the-way-of-policy-direction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/12/climate-and-environment-not-much-in-the-way-of-policy-direction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 03:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=137770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The climate and environment Budget for 2010-11 is a dull affair marked by program cuts, clean-ups and a marked lack of policy direction, writes <b>Andrew Macintosh</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/12/climate-and-environment-not-much-in-the-way-of-policy-direction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Rudd going to copy Abbott&#8217;s climate policy?</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2010/04/29/labor-to-adopt-abbott-climate-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2010/04/29/labor-to-adopt-abbott-climate-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Swan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dumping of the ETS leaves a large gaping wound where the government once had a climate policy. Now Wayne Swan's suggestions sound distinctly similar to Abbott's controversial plan, writes <b>Robert Merkel</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2010/04/29/labor-to-adopt-abbott-climate-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A little climate contingency planning</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/03/a-little-climate-contingency-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/03/a-little-climate-contingency-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most cost effective]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Government is going charging off down the path of global warming righteousness as Kevin Rudd sets out to honour the promises he made during his successful election campaign to take global warming seriously, writes Richard Farmer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/03/a-little-climate-contingency-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why should green groups take the leap of faith for Rudd?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/13/why-should-green-groups-take-the-leap-of-faith-for-rudd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/13/why-should-green-groups-take-the-leap-of-faith-for-rudd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia's peak greens are in a hot spot. Labor's climate policy is 
vague and lacking urgency, short-term emissions and renewable energy targets. And it is committed to new coal mines and increasing coal exports. Anxious for a Labor victory, what does a good green do? writes David Spratt.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/13/why-should-green-groups-take-the-leap-of-faith-for-rudd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 743/825 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 04:40:19 -->
