<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; climate change sceptics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/climate-change-sceptics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ian Plimer: the poster boy for seething shock jocks</title>
		<link>http://www.thepowerindex.com.au/thinkers/ian-plimer</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepowerindex.com.au/thinkers/ian-plimer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Plimer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=270826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ian Plimer is one of the most imperious purveyors of climate scepticism in the world and has carved out significant influence in media and political circles, writes <b>Tom Cowie</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepowerindex.com.au/thinkers/ian-plimer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Climategate emails reveal life is tough for scientists</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/24/new-climategate-emails-reveal-life-is-tough-for-scientists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/24/new-climategate-emails-reveal-life-is-tough-for-scientists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Mann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=261182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cache of emails reveals the difficulties that climate scientists have in going about their everyday work, particular under a constant barrage of Freedom of Information requests and public criticism, writes freelancer <b>Graham Readfearn</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/24/new-climategate-emails-reveal-life-is-tough-for-scientists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The climate sceptic salesmen</title>
		<link>http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,721846,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,721846,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=177656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The science might not agree with them, but climate sceptics have managed to grab a giant chunk of the media spotlight. It may be just a handful of people but they scream louder than most and are effective at getting their views heard.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,721846,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The science of denial</title>
		<link>http://www.newscientist.com/special/living-in-denial</link>
		<comments>http://www.newscientist.com/special/living-in-denial#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=140249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From climate change to evolution, <em>New Scientist</em> is running a great series of special reports into denialism: how it works, how it spreads, how companies manufacture it, and why it's so hard to fight.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newscientist.com/special/living-in-denial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An open letter to climate sceptics from scientists</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/328/5979/689</link>
		<comments>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/328/5979/689#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 05:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[250 members of the National Academies of Science have published a letter hitting back against the assaults and "McCarthy-like threats of criminal prosecution" against climate scientists over the Climategate scandal.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/328/5979/689/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate science: a field in crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,687259,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,687259,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=128741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The entire field of climate research is facing a crisis of confidence, says <em>Der Spiegel</em>. Can scientists save themselves in time to save the planet?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,687259,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Play Pure Poison&#8216;s wingnut bingo!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2010/03/31/wingnut-bingo/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2010/03/31/wingnut-bingo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Gaukroger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bingo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative commentators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=127751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Download your Pure Poison Wingnut Bingo cards, full of subjects guaranteed to get any Australian trollumnist frothing at the mouth with outrage.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2010/03/31/wingnut-bingo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenpeace: The billionaires behind the climate denial industry</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/polluterwatch/koch-industries</link>
		<comments>http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/polluterwatch/koch-industries#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Koch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Koch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpeace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch industries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=127434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greenpeace has released an extensive expose on oil industry kingpins David and Charles Koch, who it says have quietly pumped $50 million into "climate-denial front groups".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/polluterwatch/koch-industries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC chairman: climate reporting just an exercise in group-think</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/maurice-newman-speech/story-e6frg996-1225839427099</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/maurice-newman-speech/story-e6frg996-1225839427099#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=122410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate change has become an issue where contrary views are not tolerated and sceptics are mocked in the media. This shouldn't happen at the ABC, said ABC chairman -- and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/climate-balance-urged-at-abc/story-e6frg996-1225839329115">known climate change denier</a> -- <b>Maurice Newman</b>, in a speech to journos.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/maurice-newman-speech/story-e6frg996-1225839427099/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you now or have you ever been a climate scientist?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/08/are-you-now-or-have-you-ever-been-a-climate-scientist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/08/are-you-now-or-have-you-ever-been-a-climate-scientist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clive Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate denialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=121510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Accusation of criminality against leading climate scientists takes the denialist campaign of harassment and intimidation to new lows.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/08/are-you-now-or-have-you-ever-been-a-climate-scientist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jonathan Holmes: Does climate change reporting need to be balanced?</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/04/2835977.htm?site=thedrum</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/04/2835977.htm?site=thedrum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Drum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=120665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Jonathan Holmes</b> jumps in to the recent <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/02/balance-without-judgement-your-abc/">Crikey debate</a> about climate change reporting on the ABC. Does the ABC <em>need</em> to balance climate change scientists with climate change sceptics to reflect public opinion?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/04/2835977.htm?site=thedrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balance without judgement: your ABC</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/02/balance-without-judgement-your-abc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/02/balance-without-judgement-your-abc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clive hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Drum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=120095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ABC continues its habit of "balancing" mainstream climate science with the views of bloggers and professional denialists rather than climate scientists.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/02/balance-without-judgement-your-abc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>164</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roskam and the truth: he stands by Q &amp; A claim on climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/24/roskam-and-the-truth-he-stands-by-q-a-claim-on-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/24/roskam-and-the-truth-he-stands-by-q-a-claim-on-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john roskam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=118939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free market think tank director John Roskam is the latest Australian climate change sceptic to be caught out using distorted quotes to undermine the existence of global warming, writes Crikey intern <b>Matthew Knott</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/24/roskam-and-the-truth-he-stands-by-q-a-claim-on-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More fuel for the sceptics: climate scientists admit stuff up</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/21/sea-level-geoscience-retract-siddall</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/21/sea-level-geoscience-retract-siddall#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=118515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists have been forced to withdraw a study on projected sea level rises due to global warming after finding mistakes that undermined the findings. Will this be another Climategate for the deniers?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/21/sea-level-geoscience-retract-siddall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Piers Akerman fabricating quotes from the IPCC?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2010/02/12/piers-precipitating-preposterous-porkies-potentially/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2010/02/12/piers-precipitating-preposterous-porkies-potentially/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Gaukroger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Houghton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piers Akerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=116441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is News Ltd’s Piers Akerman the source of an alarmist climate change quote that has for years been attributed to the first head of the IPCC, Sir John Houghton? That's what the UK's <em>Independent</em> <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/fabricated-quote-used-to-discredit-climate-scientist-1894552.html">is claiming</a>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2010/02/12/piers-precipitating-preposterous-porkies-potentially/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climategate: The Book, written by you</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/series/climate-wars-hacked-emails</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/series/climate-wars-hacked-emails#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=115417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Guardian</em> is taking crowd-sourcing to a new level: publishing the manuscript for its new book about the hacked climate change emails and asking readers to help write, edit and "peer review" the tome. Great idea or total gimmick?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/series/climate-wars-hacked-emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abbott to the lunatic fringe: it&#8217;s OK, I&#8217;m one of you</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/04/abbott-to-the-lunatic-fringe-its-ok-im-one-of-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/04/abbott-to-the-lunatic-fringe-its-ok-im-one-of-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Monckton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony Abbott's decision to meet Lord Monckton was contemptible -- but smart politics. Abbott is just doing what he has been hired to do: dog-whistle to the extreme right of the party.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/04/abbott-to-the-lunatic-fringe-its-ok-im-one-of-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sheehan: The 10 anti-commandments of global warming</title>
		<link>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/facts-conveniently-brushed-over-by-the-global-warming-fanatics-20100131-n6fr.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/facts-conveniently-brushed-over-by-the-global-warming-fanatics-20100131-n6fr.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Paul Sheehan</b> looks at 10 questionable "facts" from the global warming war that have been largely ignored. What do they prove? Ideology and science don't belong together -- on <em>either</em> side of the debate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/facts-conveniently-brushed-over-by-the-global-warming-fanatics-20100131-n6fr.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More dodgy IPCC claims?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/01/more-dodgy-ipcc-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/01/more-dodgy-ipcc-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times (UK)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IPCC faced a fresh round of criticism in the British media over the weekend, with revelations of more spurious sources and that its chief, Rajendra Pachauri, may have known about the false claims <em>before</em> Copenhagen.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/01/more-dodgy-ipcc-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britain declares war on climate sceptics</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/31/ed-miliband-climate-change-scepticism</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/31/ed-miliband-climate-change-scepticism#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miliband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview with the <em>Observer</em>, UK climate secretary Ed Miliband declares a "battle" against climate change deniers and defends the IPCC.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/31/ed-miliband-climate-change-scepticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hamilton: Fran Kelly falls for Monckton&#8217;s media manipulation</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/28/hamilton-fran-kelly-falls-for-moncktons-media-manipulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/28/hamilton-fran-kelly-falls-for-moncktons-media-manipulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clive Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fran kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Monckton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunrise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=112485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fran Kelly and the ABC are the latest victims to fall prey to notorious climate change sceptic Lord Monckton's media manipulation. Why did Kelly not question her controversial guest and his preposterous claims?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/28/hamilton-fran-kelly-falls-for-moncktons-media-manipulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>159</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists, the IPCC wants you</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/28/scientists-the-ipcc-wants-you-perks-include-threats-smears-and-personal-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/28/scientists-the-ipcc-wants-you-perks-include-threats-smears-and-personal-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Pitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=112487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nomination to the IPCC process is an invitation for public smears, threats and routine attacks on your credibility -- not by your peers, but by newspaper columnists, bloggers and conspiracy theorists.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/28/scientists-the-ipcc-wants-you-perks-include-threats-smears-and-personal-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Growing battlefield momentum inside the Sceptics Army</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/28/crikey-says-151/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/28/crikey-says-151/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miranda Devine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piers Akerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=112399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of the two climate change wars currently being waged across the globe -- the war against climate change and the war about climate change -- it's War 2 that's now occupying the most territory.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/28/crikey-says-151/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monckton and Plimer: publish or perish</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2803278.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2803278.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Monckton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Plimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Monckton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=112467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate change sceptics Lord Monckton and Ian Plimer have every right to their opinions. But if they want us to take them seriously, they must submit them to credible peer-reviewed journals, says scientist <b>Alex Cook</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2803278.htm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor is losing the ground war on global warming opinion</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2010/01/20/when-climate-change-scepticism-changes-political-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2010/01/20/when-climate-change-scepticism-changes-political-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Possum Comitatus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morgan poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=111096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Possum Comitatus</b> digs deeper into <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2010/01/19/public-opinion-global-warming-and-the-cprs/comment-page-1/#comment-17974">a recent poll</a> on Australians' attitudes to CPRS and global warming, and finds that the ALP's failure to strongly combat climate change scepticism is klling its CPRS hopes.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2010/01/20/when-climate-change-scepticism-changes-political-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1615/1898 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 06:43:29 -->
