<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; clean coal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/clean-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Parkinson: coal is the new black</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/23/parkinson-coal-is-the-new-black/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/23/parkinson-coal-is-the-new-black/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gujarat NRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=242607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indian-owned coal company Gujarat NRE warns that a carbon tax will cause stratospheric price rises for beer, bread, shirts and petrol, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/23/parkinson-coal-is-the-new-black/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor&#8217;s form on climate policy: what not to do next</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/22/labors-form-on-climate-policy-what-not-to-do-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/22/labors-form-on-climate-policy-what-not-to-do-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garrett's roofing insulation scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hung parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=173532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If inroads are going to be made, Labor needs to show some backbone on carbon pricing and mitigation objectives, writes <b>Andrew Macintosh</b>, associate director of the ANU Centre for Climate Law and Policy. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/22/labors-form-on-climate-policy-what-not-to-do-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Milne: Greens&#8217; vision for renewables obscured by coal dust</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/20/milne-greens-vision-for-renewables-obscured-by-coal-dust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/20/milne-greens-vision-for-renewables-obscured-by-coal-dust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 03:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=166362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most troubling and baffling casualties of this campaign has been the renewable energy sector. This is particularly baffling because renewable energy is massively popular in the community and has been repeatedly demonstrated to be technically ready to power Australia at a competitive price. The public response to Beyond Zero Emissions&#8217; 100% renewable [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/20/milne-greens-vision-for-renewables-obscured-by-coal-dust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon-free reporting? Not when it&#8217;s about old king coal&#8217;s new palace</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/17/carbon-free-reporting-not-when-its-about-old-king-coals-new-palace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/17/carbon-free-reporting-not-when-its-about-old-king-coals-new-palace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal fired power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queensland government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=165157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers of media reports on the Queensland government's go-ahead late last week for the Caval Ridge coal mine in Queensland could be forgiven for thinking that the BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA) project will be carbon free, writes Bob Burton, a Hobart-based freelance journalist.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/17/carbon-free-reporting-not-when-its-about-old-king-coals-new-palace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A radioactive issue for the Coalition?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Macfarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Minchin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why has Ian Macfarlane completely reversed his opinion on Carbon Capture and Storage -- from such a strong advocate of the when in government to his recent denunciation on <em>Four Corners</em>? asks <b>Michael James</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCS Institute comes clean on clean coal</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Otter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In somewhat surprising and welcome candour, the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute's latest report suggests that there is a low likelihood of CCS being economically viable before 2030 to 2040, writes <b>Michael James</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deconstructing the mining industry&#8217;s ETS data</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/22/crunching-the-numbers-on-the-minerals-councils-ets-job-loss-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/22/crunching-the-numbers-on-the-minerals-councils-ets-job-loss-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSIRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minerals Council of Australia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=60514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A panel of <i>Crikey</i> experts deconstruct the mining industry's job data manipulation for Australia's emissions trading scheme.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/22/crunching-the-numbers-on-the-minerals-councils-ets-job-loss-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon capture and storage is an expensive pipe dream</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael R James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Tinto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xstrata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=51788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon capture and storage may be possible, but it certainly does not look commercially feasible.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Coal Association: climate change is happening and fast</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those convinced climate change is some left-wing scam would do well to click over to what our biggest polluting industries are saying, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green is the colour of money</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The announcement of a $100 million research centre to focus on clean coal technology options is a welcome move by the federal government, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capturing the carbon from coal: Should we? Shouldn&#8217;t we?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crikey spoke to two experts with differing views about the viability, the benefits and the common sense of Australia pursuing a coal with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Climate Institute defends its coal alliance</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/18/the-climate-institute-defends-its-coal-alliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/18/the-climate-institute-defends-its-coal-alliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sophie Black</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has The Climate Institute unwittingly damaged their brand by announcing a "historic alliance" with the World Wildlife Fund, The Coal Association and the CFMEU? <b>Sophie Black</b> investigates.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/18/the-climate-institute-defends-its-coal-alliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments, corrections, clarifications, and c*ckups</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brendan Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brendan Nelson's leadership ... national security ... clean coal ... Barack Obama ... Howard's speech ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming clean on &#8216;nice&#8217; coal</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/coming-clean-on-nice-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/coming-clean-on-nice-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CCS is experimental, unproven technology at the scale required, and if it works the majority of CCS deployment will not occur until the second half of this century, writes <b>David Spratt</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/coming-clean-on-nice-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey Says</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/crikey-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/crikey-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let us say here and now that we at Crikey are all for clean coal...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/crikey-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divisions on clean coal won&#8217;t sink the enviro movement</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/divisions-on-clean-coal-wont-sink-the-enviro-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/divisions-on-clean-coal-wont-sink-the-enviro-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geosequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By abandoning the polluter pays principle, WWF and the Climate Institute should be seen to have abandoned any remaining pretence of being part of the mainstream environment movement, writes <b>Greens Senator Christine Milne</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/divisions-on-clean-coal-wont-sink-the-enviro-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A handy guide for Chinese student protesters</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/14/a-handy-guide-for-chinese-student-protesters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/14/a-handy-guide-for-chinese-student-protesters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following points are based on an internal document circulated by the Chinese authorities in Australia to the Chinese Students Association of 7-8 April. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/14/a-handy-guide-for-chinese-student-protesters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd and Howard far from agreement on climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/rudd-and-howard-far-from-agreement-on-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/rudd-and-howard-far-from-agreement-on-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Howard says Kevin Rudd now agrees with him on climate change. Oh, really? asks Guy Pearse.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/rudd-and-howard-far-from-agreement-on-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubbery figures in Howard &#8216;clean&#8217; energy targets</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/24/rubbery-figures-in-howard-clean-energy-targets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/24/rubbery-figures-in-howard-clean-energy-targets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gwh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Howard's renewable energy targets are based on errant maths or creative accounting, writes Greens Senator Christine Milne.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/24/rubbery-figures-in-howard-clean-energy-targets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nice profit BHP, shame about the environment</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/23/nice-profit-bhp-shame-about-the-environment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/23/nice-profit-bhp-shame-about-the-environment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record profits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The coverage of BHP’s profits fails to make this connection and fails to ask a very basic question: if climate change is such a threat, then why is it good that BHP continues to mine and export even more coal and other climate-changing products? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/23/nice-profit-bhp-shame-about-the-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1383/1604 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 21:40:22 -->
