<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; clean coal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/clean-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A radioactive issue for the Coalition?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Macfarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Minchin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why has Ian Macfarlane completely reversed his opinion on Carbon Capture and Storage -- from such a strong advocate of the when in government to his recent denunciation on <em>Four Corners</em>? asks <b>Michael James</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCS Institute comes clean on clean coal</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Otter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In somewhat surprising and welcome candour, the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute's latest report suggests that there is a low likelihood of CCS being economically viable before 2030 to 2040, writes <b>Michael James</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deconstructing the mining industry&#8217;s ETS data</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/22/crunching-the-numbers-on-the-minerals-councils-ets-job-loss-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/22/crunching-the-numbers-on-the-minerals-councils-ets-job-loss-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSIRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minerals Council of Australia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=60514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A panel of <i>Crikey</i> experts deconstruct the mining industry's job data manipulation for Australia's emissions trading scheme.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/22/crunching-the-numbers-on-the-minerals-councils-ets-job-loss-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon capture and storage is an expensive pipe dream</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Tinto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xstrata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=51788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon capture and storage may be possible, but it certainly does not look commercially feasible.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Coal Association: climate change is happening and fast</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those convinced climate change is some left-wing scam would do well to click over to what our biggest polluting industries are saying, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green is the colour of money</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The announcement of a $100 million research centre to focus on clean coal technology options is a welcome move by the federal government, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capturing the carbon from coal: Should we? Shouldn&#8217;t we?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crikey spoke to two experts with differing views about the viability, the benefits and the common sense of Australia pursuing a coal with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Climate Institute defends its coal alliance</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/18/the-climate-institute-defends-its-coal-alliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/18/the-climate-institute-defends-its-coal-alliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sophie Black</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has The Climate Institute unwittingly damaged their brand by announcing a "historic alliance" with the World Wildlife Fund, The Coal Association and the CFMEU? <b>Sophie Black</b> investigates.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/18/the-climate-institute-defends-its-coal-alliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments, corrections, clarifications, and c*ckups</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brendan Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brendan Nelson's leadership ... national security ... clean coal ... Barack Obama ... Howard's speech ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming clean on &#8216;nice&#8217; coal</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/coming-clean-on-nice-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/coming-clean-on-nice-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CCS is experimental, unproven technology at the scale required, and if it works the majority of CCS deployment will not occur until the second half of this century, writes <b>David Spratt</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/coming-clean-on-nice-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey Says</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/crikey-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/crikey-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let us say here and now that we at Crikey are all for clean coal...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/crikey-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divisions on clean coal won&#8217;t sink the enviro movement</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/divisions-on-clean-coal-wont-sink-the-enviro-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/divisions-on-clean-coal-wont-sink-the-enviro-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geosequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By abandoning the polluter pays principle, WWF and the Climate Institute should be seen to have abandoned any remaining pretence of being part of the mainstream environment movement, writes <b>Greens Senator Christine Milne</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/divisions-on-clean-coal-wont-sink-the-enviro-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A handy guide for Chinese student protesters</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/14/a-handy-guide-for-chinese-student-protesters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/14/a-handy-guide-for-chinese-student-protesters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following points are based on an internal document circulated by the Chinese authorities in Australia to the Chinese Students Association of 7-8 April. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/14/a-handy-guide-for-chinese-student-protesters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd and Howard far from agreement on climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/rudd-and-howard-far-from-agreement-on-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/rudd-and-howard-far-from-agreement-on-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Howard says Kevin Rudd now agrees with him on climate change. Oh, really? asks Guy Pearse.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/rudd-and-howard-far-from-agreement-on-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubbery figures in Howard &#8216;clean&#8217; energy targets</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/24/rubbery-figures-in-howard-clean-energy-targets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/24/rubbery-figures-in-howard-clean-energy-targets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gwh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Howard's renewable energy targets are based on errant maths or creative accounting, writes Greens Senator Christine Milne.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/24/rubbery-figures-in-howard-clean-energy-targets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nice profit BHP, shame about the environment</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/23/nice-profit-bhp-shame-about-the-environment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/23/nice-profit-bhp-shame-about-the-environment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record profits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The coverage of BHP’s profits fails to make this connection and fails to ask a very basic question: if climate change is such a threat, then why is it good that BHP continues to mine and export even more coal and other climate-changing products? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/23/nice-profit-bhp-shame-about-the-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
