Clean coal


CCS Institute comes clean on clean coal

In somewhat surprising and welcome candour, the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute’s latest report suggests that there is a low likelihood of CCS being economically viable before 2030 to 2040, writes Michael James.

Deconstructing the mining industry’s ETS data

A panel of Crikey experts deconstruct the mining industry’s job data manipulation for Australia’s emissions trading scheme.

Carbon capture and storage is an expensive pipe dream

Carbon capture and storage may be possible, but it certainly does not look commercially feasible.

Australian Coal Association: climate change is happening and fast

Those convinced climate change is some left-wing scam would do well to click over to what our biggest polluting industries are saying, writes Bernard Keane.

Green is the colour of money

The announcement of a $100 million research centre to focus on clean coal technology options is a welcome move by the federal government, writes Giles Parkinson.

Capturing the carbon from coal: Should we? Shouldn’t we?

Crikey spoke to two experts with differing views about the viability, the benefits and the common sense of Australia pursuing a coal with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS).

The Climate Institute defends its coal alliance

Has The Climate Institute unwittingly damaged their brand by announcing a “historic alliance” with the World Wildlife Fund, The Coal Association and the CFMEU? Sophie Black investigates.

Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback: Comments, corrections, clarifications, and c*ckups

Brendan Nelson’s leadership … national security … clean coal … Barack Obama … Howard’s speech …

Coming clean on ‘nice’ coal

CCS is experimental, unproven technology at the scale required, and if it works the majority of CCS deployment will not occur until the second half of this century, writes David Spratt.

Crikey Says: Crikey Says

Let us say here and now that we at Crikey are all for clean coal…

Divisions on clean coal won’t sink the enviro movement

By abandoning the polluter pays principle, WWF and the Climate Institute should be seen to have abandoned any remaining pretence of being part of the mainstream environment movement, writes Greens Senator Christine Milne.

A handy guide for Chinese student protesters

The following points are based on an internal document circulated by the Chinese authorities in Australia to the Chinese Students Association of 7-8 April.

Rudd and Howard far from agreement on climate change

John Howard says Kevin Rudd now agrees with him on climate change. Oh, really? asks Guy Pearse.

Rubbery figures in Howard ‘clean’ energy targets

John Howard’s renewable energy targets are based on errant maths or creative accounting, writes Greens Senator Christine Milne.

Nice profit BHP, shame about the environment

The coverage of BHP’s profits fails to make this connection and fails to ask a very basic question: if climate change is such a threat, then why is it good that BHP continues to mine and export even more coal and other climate-changing products?