<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; chemo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/chemo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Are breast cancer screening benefits being oversold?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/20/are-breast-cancer-screening-benefits-being-oversold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/20/are-breast-cancer-screening-benefits-being-oversold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many leading cancer epidemiologists are now calling for women to be given more complete information about the probabilities, risks and benefits of screening, writes <b>Simon Chapman</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/20/are-breast-cancer-screening-benefits-being-oversold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 8 bad meta-arguments against global warming</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/13/the-8-bad-meta-arguments-against-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/13/the-8-bad-meta-arguments-against-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doomsday scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Diamond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the science fails, anti-global warming irrationalists resort to meta-arguments. And that’s where the thinking gets really bad.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/13/the-8-bad-meta-arguments-against-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
