<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; carbon price package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/carbon-price-package/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Locking in a surplus with the carbon price pea-and-thimble trick</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/09/locking-in-a-surplus-with-the-carbon-price-pea-and-thimble-trick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/09/locking-in-a-surplus-with-the-carbon-price-pea-and-thimble-trick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surplus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Swan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=258082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forgetting cutting emissions - the carbon price package has a shorter term benefit for the government. There's one minister relieved that the carbon pricing package is locked in, and not for anything to do with emissions abatement.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/09/locking-in-a-surplus-with-the-carbon-price-pea-and-thimble-trick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon tax passes but blood pledge remains</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/09/carbon-tax-passes-but-blood-pledge-remains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/09/carbon-tax-passes-but-blood-pledge-remains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber Jamieson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Milne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=257979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Crikey media wrap</b>: It's taken years of debates, discussion papers and fallen leaders, but yesterday the senate passed Australia's first carbon legislation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/09/carbon-tax-passes-but-blood-pledge-remains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abbott&#8217;s gory pledge would be a legal bloodbath</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/13/abbotts-gory-pledge-would-be-a-legal-bloodbath/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/13/abbotts-gory-pledge-would-be-a-legal-bloodbath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=252546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tont Abbott’s hyperbole has certainly attracted the headlines, but it betrays a curious tactic, writes <b>Fergus Green</b>, a lawyer and policy analyst specialising in climate change.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/13/abbotts-gory-pledge-would-be-a-legal-bloodbath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is China showing Australia the way on carbon emissions?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/10/12/is-china-showing-australia-the-way-on-carbon-emissions/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/10/12/is-china-showing-australia-the-way-on-carbon-emissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=252223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon price package naysayers claim that China is doing nothing to limit carbon emissions. It is, but like Australia, has a long way to go, writes <b>Richard Farmer</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/10/12/is-china-showing-australia-the-way-on-carbon-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speak up, Malcolm, we can&#8217;t hear you</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/15/malcolm-turnbull-on-laborcarbon-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/15/malcolm-turnbull-on-laborcarbon-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 03:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=247024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony Abbott had this to say about the government's Clean Energy Future legislation yesterday:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/15/malcolm-turnbull-on-laborcarbon-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons learnt from the solar industry subsidy</title>
		<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/entrepreneur-watch/20110912-solar-industry-s-subsidy-lesson.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/entrepreneur-watch/20110912-solar-industry-s-subsidy-lesson.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar subsidy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=246600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who would have thought that less than a year out from the start of Australia's carbon tax the nation's solar sector would be in disarray? <b>James Thomson</b> reflects on how our solar industry lost its shine. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/entrepreneur-watch/20110912-solar-industry-s-subsidy-lesson.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia&#8217;s green groups fight everything but criticism against them</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/09/07/green-groups-fight-everything-but-criticism-against-them/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/09/07/green-groups-fight-everything-but-criticism-against-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 06:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=245751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throughout 2011, Australia’s best-funded environment organisations have been united in support of the Labor government’s push to establish a carbon price. Not everyone thinks this is a good thing, writes <b>Leigh Ewbank</b>.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/09/07/green-groups-fight-everything-but-criticism-against-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A carbon price to cause house prices to rise by $6000? What crap</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/04/a-carbon-price-to-cause-house-prices-to-rise-by-6000-what-crap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/04/a-carbon-price-to-cause-house-prices-to-rise-by-6000-what-crap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 02:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homebuilding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=239311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The claim that a carbon price will cause house prices to rise by $6000 is crap, writes environmental consultant <b>Ben Rose</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/04/a-carbon-price-to-cause-house-prices-to-rise-by-6000-what-crap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quiggin: the average household will barely notice carbon tax</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/carbon-tax-average-household-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/carbon-tax-average-household-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Conference of Economists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduce carbon emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=235746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It follows that, although the carbon tax will have a significant impact on our aggregate emissions of CO2, mainly through its impact on electricity generation and energy use by business, the average household will barely notice it, writes <b>John Quiggin</b>, an ARC Federation Fellow in Economics and Political Science at the University of Queensland.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/carbon-tax-average-household-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia&#8217;s carbon tax well ahead of Britain</title>
		<link>http://www.economist.com/node/18958387?story_id=18958387&#038;fsrc=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.economist.com/node/18958387?story_id=18958387&#038;fsrc=rss#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=235706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labor's carbon price package is far from perfect but Julia Gillard deserves credit not just for introducing an ETS but by modelling it as a shift in taxation. Britain and other governments ought to take note, says <em>The Economist</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.economist.com/node/18958387?story_id=18958387&#038;fsrc=rss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon price package a blend of concessions and contradictions</title>
		<link>http://inside.org.au/a-clean-energy-future-for-whom/</link>
		<comments>http://inside.org.au/a-clean-energy-future-for-whom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=235449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government's carbon price package will pull the economy in contradictory directions. On one hand it offers plenty of concessions for heavy polluters and on the other a sizeable investment in green energy, writes <b>Fergus Green</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://inside.org.au/a-clean-energy-future-for-whom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s bad, but it&#8217;s going to get worse for Labor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/07/12/its-bad-but-its-going-to-get-worse-for-labor/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/07/12/its-bad-but-its-going-to-get-worse-for-labor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=234853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the carbon tax debate is about something that’s going to happen, Labor is in for a public opinion poll hiding. People are wary of change and they don’t trust politicians — especially politicians who have so recently lied to them and broken a promise not to introduce one, writes <b>Richard Farmer</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/07/12/its-bad-but-its-going-to-get-worse-for-labor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon pricing an important public health advance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/07/11/carbon-pricing-is-an-important-public-health-advance/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/07/11/carbon-pricing-is-an-important-public-health-advance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=234588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the carbon tax debate health takes a back seat while environmental issues take priority. However, action by the government to address environmental issues will also assist in addressing health impacts, writes <b>Michael Moore </b>and <b>Helen Keleher</b>. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/07/11/carbon-pricing-is-an-important-public-health-advance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jericho: The biccies are safe, so let&#8217;s take a look at the carbon tax</title>
		<link>http://grogsgamut.blogspot.com/2011/07/carbon-price-tim-tams-are-safe-not-sure.html</link>
		<comments>http://grogsgamut.blogspot.com/2011/07/carbon-price-tim-tams-are-safe-not-sure.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 23:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=234580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phew! The price of Tim Tams under Labor's new carbon tax will only increase by $0.012. Now that's out of the way, <b>Greg Jericho</b> takes a look at the carbon price package - particularly changes to rates and taxation and what it will do to emissions. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://grogsgamut.blogspot.com/2011/07/carbon-price-tim-tams-are-safe-not-sure.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1160/1299 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2013-05-24 12:54:38 -->