Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme


Scare tactics again the order of the day

Tony Abbott has already given a hint of how his Liberal leadership will play out. The conservatives of old have reverted to type; scare tactics will again be the order of the day, writes Norman Abjorensen.

Possum: An ETS-driven voter backlash? Polling says no

The deluge of emails, letters and phone calls into the offices of coalition members against the ETS — so we’re told — signified a revolt! But does polling actually support this? Not exactly. Abbott, you’ve been warned.

Abbott’s leadership: a win for climate change sceptics everywhere

Judging from what we’ve seen so far, Tony Abbott’s election campaign will be a negative affair, with him as chief guard dog. But what will he attack? asks Ben Eltham. Climate change?

When they say Abbott is a ‘conviction’ politician, do they mean ‘unpopular’?

So the least electable Liberal leader has been chosen to lead the party. How is Tony Abbott going to deal with climate change? Will it be an even more extreme return to the Howard era?

Why pass now and change later won’t help the CPRS

The Greens oppose the CPRS not because it is too weak, but because it will point Australia in the wrong direction with little prospect of turning it around in the timeframe within which emissions must peak, says Senator Christine Milne.

Households bail out business on dud CPRS

Australia’s biggest polluters will enjoy vast windfall gains under the compromise offered by the Government to extract support from Malcolm Turnbull for the passage of its CPRS.

Keane: The ETS Chainsaw Massacre

What a difference a few years makes. Ian “Chainsaw” Macfarlane has moved from a climate change denier in the Howard government to a CPRS loving greenie, writes Bernard Keane.

The real costs of Rudd’s CPRS are just starting to surface

The Government’s climate change policy is incoherent and becoming ever more expensive, writes Sinclair Davidson. No amount of name-calling is going to change the fact that this policy is a lemon and needs to be radically reconsidered.

Is Rudd the worst kind of climate skeptic?

Kevin Rudd’s speech to the Lowy Institute last Friday was one of the most extraordinary pieces of rhetorical hypocrisy this country has seen in recent years, says Tim Hollo.

Rudd’s goldfish-in-a-bowl approach: the three-second voter memory

Rather than implementing policy, Rudd is constantly maintaining a political campaign. Stay on message, make the Opposition the issue, win the day. But the big test for this government is if it can actually realise an ETS, says Trevor Cook.

Kohler: How the collapsing US$ will damage Copenhagen

For Australia, an international emissions trading scheme in Copenhagen may prove an economic disaster, thanks to a dropping US dollar a and rising Aussie dollar. It’s happening around the world and it’s making a Copenhagen deal unlikely.

Copenhagen is coming, lower your expectations

With the Copenhagen climate change conference just five weeks away and national leaders and scientists already disagreeing, it looks like a global plan for climate change and emissions targets is unlikely, writes David Spratt.

Reform the food industry — for the sake of the planet

The food industry’s solution of more choice increases profits, but does nothing for obesity. The more on offer, the more we buy, the more we waist and the more we waste, writes Dr Rosemary Stanton.

How much cash will the states get under the CPRS? Zero.

Unfortunately for those of us who ever rely on the public health, education or transport systems, the CPRS is estimated to cost state budgets more than $2.1 billion in 2013, writes executive director of the Australia Institute, Dr Richard Denniss.

Crikey Says: Calm down, no rush on CPRS

Apparently the CPRS isn’t that urgent. Otherwise, why would debate keep getting delayed by both the Coalition and the government?

The $20b CPRS amendments with no budget impact

The Opposition believes its proposed CPRS amendments will have little or no fiscal impact, despite a suggested significant increase in compensation for trade-exposed polluters and the removal of coal emissions from the scheme.

Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback: Climate change, CPRS and politics

Climate change and the ETS were the biggest topics for Crikey readers today, with readers lamenting the politicisation of an global environmental issue.

Joyce fights back: I’m not crazy — the ETS is mad!

After Virginia Trioli made the international sign of crazy at Barnaby Joyce, Joyce has come out swinging, explaining why the ETS is more insane than him. Why? Because it will raise milkshake prices.

Crikey Says: The parallel universe of Canberra

Malcolm Turnbull’s finally got the green light from the Coalition to negotiate on the ETS. Too bad all the party politics means the key issue gets ignored.

Turnbull’s execution was all in the mind

Yesterday’s special coalition party room meeting about whether or not Malcolm Turnbull could get the Coalition to agree to make ETS amendments wasn’t so much a damp squib as sopping wet.

The CPRS: what the Liberals want

So Malcolm Turnbull has convinced the Coalition to push amendments on the Government’s CPRS. But what is it that the Liberals want?

Like a parrot on ritalin: Turnbull’s weird return to Jonestown

When is a tax not a tax? When it’s a rhetorical device for people opposed to emissions trading schemes. Malcolm Turnbull went to battle with Alan Jones over the ETS.

What’s an ETS? That’s when you turn your AC off, right?

Just when you think that all anyone is talking about is climate change, ETS, CPRS or Copenhagen, North Coast Voices reminds us that those are complicated terms.

Not even fear mongering can save the Opposition

Many in the Opposition are pushing an anti-ETS line, but it’s hard to run a scare campaign when you’re not in power. A time will come when voters don’t view Kevin Rudd as Father Christmas, but not for awhile, writes Peter Brent.

Swan’s Frontier moment shows just what Turnbull is up against

Nothing is left to chance with the Rudd government. No detail is too small that it can’t be deployed in the remorseless bombardment of the Opposition. Like Wayne Swan picking holes in their CPRS proposal.