<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/carbon-pollution-reduction-scheme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Parkinson: no easy choices, but strong case for energy action</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/06/parkinson-no-easy-choices-but-strong-case-for-energy-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/06/parkinson-no-easy-choices-but-strong-case-for-energy-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal seam gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grattan Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=272733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report from the Grattan Institute has underlined the failure of current policies to push Australia down the path of a clean energy future <b>Giles Parkinson</b>, editor of <a href="http://reneweconomy.com.au/"><em>RenewEconomy</em></a>, reports.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/06/parkinson-no-easy-choices-but-strong-case-for-energy-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The carbon tax pitch: call it what it is &#8212; a pollution tax</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/28/the-carbon-tax-pitch-call-it-what-it-is-a-pollution-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/28/the-carbon-tax-pitch-call-it-what-it-is-a-pollution-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global carbon emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=238205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The public cry for clarity regarding the so-called carbon tax, and Labor’s problem with communicating clearly continue to threaten its existence, writes <b>Alex Frankel</b>, a communications researcher and strategist.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/28/the-carbon-tax-pitch-call-it-what-it-is-a-pollution-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Look beyond a carbon price and examine whether your cuts will count</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/16/look-beyond-a-carbon-price-and-examine-whether-your-cuts-will-count/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/16/look-beyond-a-carbon-price-and-examine-whether-your-cuts-will-count/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and slicec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=229663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way in which the CPRS set both a cap above which emissions could not rise and a floor below which emissions could not fall was widely debated, if not widely understood, during 2009 and 2010. But those lessons need to be learnt again, writes <b>Dr Richard Denniss</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/16/look-beyond-a-carbon-price-and-examine-whether-your-cuts-will-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polluting power &#8230; Australia in the top 10</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/21/polluting-power-australia-in-the-top-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/21/polluting-power-australia-in-the-top-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Climate Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=219251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia’s power sector ranks among the 10 most polluting power sectors on the planet, alongside Botswana, Cambodia and Estonia, writes <b>John Connor</b>, CEO of The Climate Institute.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/21/polluting-power-australia-in-the-top-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clean energy moves ahead amid climate policy carnage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/09/23/clean-energy-moves-ahead-amid-climate-policy-carnage/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/09/23/clean-energy-moves-ahead-amid-climate-policy-carnage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=174100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Passage of the enhanced 20% renewable energy target is one hard fought victory for climate change policy amongst the wreckage littering the corridors of parliament house in Canberra, says <b>Rob Grant</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/09/23/clean-energy-moves-ahead-amid-climate-policy-carnage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The potential for renewables in regional Oz</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/08/the-potential-for-renewables-in-regional-oz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/08/the-potential-for-renewables-in-regional-oz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Climate Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=170422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday Australia took one step out of the quagmire of pollution politics, where scare campaigns and excessive claims for assistance from many of the big polluters influenced both the politics and the outcomes, writes <b>John Connor</b>, CEO of The Climate Institute.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/08/the-potential-for-renewables-in-regional-oz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early leadership surprises in pollution, climate change race</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/16/early-leadership-surprises-in-pollution-climate-change-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/16/early-leadership-surprises-in-pollution-climate-change-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emission Reduction Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garrett's roofing insulation scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=153972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the political parties look to the race up the mountain to the election, the person wearing the yellow jersey for pollution reduction may come as a surprise to some: it’s Tony Abbott, writes <b>John Connor</b>, CEO of The Climate Institute.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/16/early-leadership-surprises-in-pollution-climate-change-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No carbon price? You&#8217;re being conned</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/12/on-climate-change-politicians-think-youre-stupid-and-youre-paying-for-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/12/on-climate-change-politicians-think-youre-stupid-and-youre-paying-for-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 03:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=152210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you can put aside the high and rising costs of failing to commence Australia's transition from one of the world's biggest carbon addicts to a low-carbon economy aside, our handling of climate policy has been the stuff of priceless comedy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/12/on-climate-change-politicians-think-youre-stupid-and-youre-paying-for-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>168</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why economists need to engage in the CPRS debate</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/29/why-economists-need-to-engage-in-the-cprs-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/29/why-economists-need-to-engage-in-the-cprs-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=149170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How should climate change be dealt with by economists? asks <b>Dr Martin Parkinson</b>, secretary of the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/29/why-economists-need-to-engage-in-the-cprs-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colless: The cost of jobs at any price</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/jobs-at-any-price-is-phony-policy/story-e6frg6zo-1225876665582</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/jobs-at-any-price-is-phony-policy/story-e6frg6zo-1225876665582#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building the Education Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garrett's roofing insulation scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=144491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jobs, jobs, jobs: it's been Rudd's mantra ever since the GFC hit and it explains the insulation debacle and the BER scheme. Except its an unrealistic and phoney concept, writes <b>Malcolm Colless</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/jobs-at-any-price-is-phony-policy/story-e6frg6zo-1225876665582/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why it&#8217;s great that the ETS got the chop</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/05/27/when-something-is-clearly-not-better-than-nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/05/27/when-something-is-clearly-not-better-than-nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 23:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=142052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most frustrating argument in support of the CPRS was this notion that, even though it was acknowledged as appalling policy, “something is better than nothing”. Sounds nice, but it’s a logical fallacy, writes <b>Tim Hollo</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/05/27/when-something-is-clearly-not-better-than-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The smoking gun: Labor always planned to shut the Greens out of the ETS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/05/17/the-smoking-gun-labor-always-planned-to-shut-the-greens-out-of-the-ets/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/05/17/the-smoking-gun-labor-always-planned-to-shut-the-greens-out-of-the-ets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Tanner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was always Kevin Rudd’s political strategy to do a deal on an ETS with the Opposition, and to shut the Greens out of any negotiations. And now there's proof, says the Greens' <b>Tim Hollo</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/05/17/the-smoking-gun-labor-always-planned-to-shut-the-greens-out-of-the-ets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China likely to introduce carbon price before Australia</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/14/china-likely-to-introduce-carbon-price-before-australia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/14/china-likely-to-introduce-carbon-price-before-australia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 03:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Garnaut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian policy to not reintroduce CPRS legislation until 2013 leaves the country in danger of being left behind, with China being far more progressive on climate action, writes <b>Peter Wood</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/14/china-likely-to-introduce-carbon-price-before-australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uhlmann: Meltdown, schmeltdown, Rudd&#8217;s a climate wimp</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/14/2899102.htm?site=thedrum</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/14/2899102.htm?site=thedrum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 23:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rudd's just bowling a nude ball when it comes to his handling of the ETS. What happened to "delay equals denial" and "too much time wasting"? asks <b>Chris Uhlmann</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/14/2899102.htm?site=thedrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate and environment: not much in the way of policy direction</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/12/climate-and-environment-not-much-in-the-way-of-policy-direction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/12/climate-and-environment-not-much-in-the-way-of-policy-direction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 03:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=137770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The climate and environment Budget for 2010-11 is a dull affair marked by program cuts, clean-ups and a marked lack of policy direction, writes <b>Andrew Macintosh</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/12/climate-and-environment-not-much-in-the-way-of-policy-direction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd&#8217;s greatest challenge: surviving his ETS somersault</title>
		<link>http://inside.org.au/lost-in-the-spin-cycle/</link>
		<comments>http://inside.org.au/lost-in-the-spin-cycle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 01:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=136888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather than selling the ETS to the Australian public, Rudd was busy playing wedge politics with Malcolm Turnbull. Now his decision to dump it will cost him dearly in both electoral and larger political terms, writes <b>Rodney Tiffen</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://inside.org.au/lost-in-the-spin-cycle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The climate change bombardment &#8212; it pays to co-ordinate your fire</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/07/the-climate-change-bombardment-it-pays-to-co-ordinate-your-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/07/the-climate-change-bombardment-it-pays-to-co-ordinate-your-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 03:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[getup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=136502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have read during the week of a micro-revolt by Labor MPs over the Government's abandonment of the CPRS. Except there was more to the bombardment by outraged younger voters than met the eye...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/07/the-climate-change-bombardment-it-pays-to-co-ordinate-your-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antony Green: The little ETS that couldn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2010/05/is-the-rudd-governments-ets-legislation-a-double-dissolution-trigger.html</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2010/05/is-the-rudd-governments-ets-legislation-a-double-dissolution-trigger.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 02:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=135477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically, the ETS legislation was a double dissolution trigger. So why didn't Kevin Rudd pull the trigger? Because only the original ETS -- not the amended version -- could be used and that wasn't helpful to anyone, explains <b>Antony Green</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2010/05/is-the-rudd-governments-ets-legislation-a-double-dissolution-trigger.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Henderson: Julia is Kevin&#8217;s one saving grace</title>
		<link>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/admirers-suffer-a-rudd-awakening-20100503-u3of.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/admirers-suffer-a-rudd-awakening-20100503-u3of.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 22:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My School]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=135333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd is a major disappointment for supporters, from his ETS failure to wimping out on Henry Review recommendations. Only Julia Gillard has achieved reform with her My School initiative, writes <b>Gerard Henderson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/admirers-suffer-a-rudd-awakening-20100503-u3of.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Essential: Rudd trashed after taking out the garbage</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/03/essential-rudd-cops-a-hit-after-taking-out-the-garbage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/03/essential-rudd-cops-a-hit-after-taking-out-the-garbage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 03:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approval ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essential Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=135082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government deck-clearing and controversy over its decision to shelve its CPRS has taken a bite out of Kevin Rudd's personal approval rating, according to polling in today's Essential Report.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/03/essential-rudd-cops-a-hit-after-taking-out-the-garbage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coorey: Malcolm the martyr</title>
		<link>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/martyr-turnbull-comes-in-from-cold-20100502-u1bs.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/martyr-turnbull-comes-in-from-cold-20100502-u1bs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If John Howard was re-elected in 2007, we'd already have an ETS up and running. Instead, Kevin Rudd wimped out and now Malcolm Turnbull remains the only one with any guts in politics, writes <b>Phillip Coorey</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/martyr-turnbull-comes-in-from-cold-20100502-u1bs.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ETS is dead, where to now?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/04/30/ets-is-dead-where-to-now/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/04/30/ets-is-dead-where-to-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the ETS being consigned to the dustbins of history, the pressing question climate campaigners are asking themselves is: where do we go now that politics have failed us miserably? <b>Patrick Tombola</b> offers one idea.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/04/30/ets-is-dead-where-to-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Rudd going to copy Abbott&#8217;s climate policy?</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2010/04/29/labor-to-adopt-abbott-climate-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2010/04/29/labor-to-adopt-abbott-climate-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Swan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dumping of the ETS leaves a large gaping wound where the government once had a climate policy. Now Wayne Swan's suggestions sound distinctly similar to Abbott's controversial plan, writes <b>Robert Merkel</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2010/04/29/labor-to-adopt-abbott-climate-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fran Kelly: Political satire is no longer a joke</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/29/2886198.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/29/2886198.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollowmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Rudd ditching his grand ETS plan to Tony Abbott criticising him for it and the Greens dropping the ball on climate policy, this week in politics could have been an episode of <em>Hollowmen, writes <b>Fran Kelly</b>.</em>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/29/2886198.htm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shanahan: Why the ETS was doomed to fail</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/poor-political-skills-doomed-rudds-climate-policy/story-e6frg6zo-1225860365181</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/poor-political-skills-doomed-rudds-climate-policy/story-e6frg6zo-1225860365181#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd's climate policy was never going to work because it was all about show, not effective and practical policy, says <b>Dennis Shanahan</b>. Simplifying climate change into a "moral challenge" just created a series of errors.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/poor-political-skills-doomed-rudds-climate-policy/story-e6frg6zo-1225860365181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1682/1923 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 14:44:43 -->
