<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; carbon footprint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/carbon-footprint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Governments back away from nuclear projects after Japan crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/21/japan-crisis-leads-to-us-italy-cancelling-nuclear-projects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/21/japan-crisis-leads-to-us-italy-cancelling-nuclear-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Dyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima Daiichi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power plants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=219197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week two reactors planned for Texas and four in Italy have been shelved or cancelled in what is the most dramatic fallout so far for the industry outside of Japan's Fukushima disaster.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/21/japan-crisis-leads-to-us-italy-cancelling-nuclear-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recycle your plastic, recycle your home</title>
		<link>http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/would-you-like-grass-with-your-junior-mac-20100727-10uem.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/would-you-like-grass-with-your-junior-mac-20100727-10uem.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=158465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People concerned about their carbon footprint can recycle a lot more than paper and plastic. A bold new project from an Australian artist aims to solve sustainability issues by knocking down existing houses and replacing them with eco-friendly alternatives. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/would-you-like-grass-with-your-junior-mac-20100727-10uem.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things my dog says&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/15/things-my-dog-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/15/things-my-dog-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 03:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Firstdog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Dog on the Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[couch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis Ball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vacuum Cleaner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=145744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tennis Balls]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/15/things-my-dog-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you have the “I’ve done my bit” feeling?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/05/18/do-you-have-the-ive-done-my-bit-feeling/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/05/18/do-you-have-the-ive-done-my-bit-feeling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 06:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=139523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So while K-Rudd et al. are busy ensuring that Australia doesn’t act on climate change, what can the average Australian do to reduce their own carbon footprint? asks <b>Matt de Neef</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/05/18/do-you-have-the-ive-done-my-bit-feeling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much energy does it take to produce a pound of food?</title>
		<link>http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/03/energy-required-for-pound-of-food.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/03/energy-required-for-pound-of-food.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph pr0n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegetarianism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=120770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much energy does it take to produce a pound of beef, milk or apples? And what kind of caloric bang do you get for your buck? <em>Treehugger</em> has compiled a handy graph.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/03/energy-required-for-pound-of-food.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green guilt: the new sins of the 21st century</title>
		<link>http://chronicle.com/article/Green-Guilt/63447/</link>
		<comments>http://chronicle.com/article/Green-Guilt/63447/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmentalism is the new Christianity in the West, says <b>Stephen Asma</b>: instead of sloth, greed and lust plaguing our conscience, it's watering the garden, plastic bags and driving a car.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chronicle.com/article/Green-Guilt/63447/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copenhagen&#8217;s climate footprint</title>
		<link>http://www.ngpowereu.com/news/copenhagen-carbon-footprint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ngpowereu.com/news/copenhagen-carbon-footprint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph pr0n]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=104763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Copenhagen climate summit will generate some 41,000 tonnes of "carbon dioxide equivalent". <em>Power &#038; Energy</em> breaks it down into exactly what that looks like and where it's coming from. 200,000 cups of coffee is just the beginning...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ngpowereu.com/news/copenhagen-carbon-footprint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copenhagen will create 41,000 tonnes of C02</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6736517/Copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-private-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6736517/Copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-private-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=103920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[15,000 delegates and officials, 5000 journalists, 98 world leaders, 1200 limos and 140 private jets: the Copenhagen climate summit is going to leave one hell of a carbon footprint.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6736517/Copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-private-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a Hummer-driving vegan greener than a beef-eater in a Prius?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/adam-pasick/2009/10/26/crunching-the-numbers-on-a-vegan-in-a-hummer/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/adam-pasick/2009/10/26/crunching-the-numbers-on-a-vegan-in-a-hummer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbom emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hummer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid vars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veganism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegetarianism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=95880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Food activist Michael Pollan caused quite <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=hummer+prius+pollan">a stir</a> recently by <a href="http://www.poptech.org/blog/michael_pollans_gospel_of_sustainable_food#">claiming</a> that "A vegan in a Hummer has a lighter carbon footprint than a beef eater in a Prius." It's a great little line, says <b>Adam Pasick</b> -- too bad it's total BS. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/adam-pasick/2009/10/26/crunching-the-numbers-on-a-vegan-in-a-hummer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sketchy science of carbon footprints</title>
		<link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125322734427521091.html</link>
		<comments>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125322734427521091.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenwashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=87852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Measuring the carbon footprint of your business/travel/lifestyle is So Hot Right Now, but the maths and methodologies involved are so imprecise and subjective, a "low carbon" label may soon be as meaningless as a "low fat" one. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125322734427521091.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How green is your milk?</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/aug/07/milk-environmental-impact</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/aug/07/milk-environmental-impact#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dairy industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=79831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With more public awareness of the vast carbon emissions produced by cows, the dairy industry doesn't quite enjoy the family-friendly image it once did. So is it time to start pouring water on our Weetbix, or can we have our milk and drink it too?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/aug/07/milk-environmental-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The environmental impact of everyday purchases</title>
		<link>http://www.newsweek.com/id/207780?from=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsweek.com/id/207780?from=rss#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=77864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything you buy -- yes, everything -- has an environmental footprint, and according to psychologist Daniel Goleman, knowing the environmental costs of our purchases can have a huge impact on consumer behaviour. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsweek.com/id/207780?from=rss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letting consumers in on the carbon footprint of hiking boots</title>
		<link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/ken-musgrave/thinkdesign/why-we-need-globally-recognized-unit-green?partner=homepage_newsletter</link>
		<comments>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/ken-musgrave/thinkdesign/why-we-need-globally-recognized-unit-green?partner=homepage_newsletter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timberland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=73768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Owner footwear brand Timberland, <b>Jeff Swartz</b>, explains why the company added a label to all their shoes, detailing the CO2 emissions, chemicals and percentage of renewable materials used in its manufacturing. It's like a nutrition label for consumer goods, he says.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/ken-musgrave/thinkdesign/why-we-need-globally-recognized-unit-green?partner=homepage_newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U2&#8242;s massive carbon footprint</title>
		<link>http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/entertainment/music/news/have-u2-created-a-monster-with-massive-carbon-footprint-of-360-tour-14388326.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/entertainment/music/news/have-u2-created-a-monster-with-massive-carbon-footprint-of-360-tour-14388326.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=72103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U2's "360" World Tour this year will generate 64.42 tonnes of CO2, with the band clocking up 70,000 air miles in their private jet, while other planes haul three 390-tonne stages and 200 crew members around the world. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/entertainment/music/news/have-u2-created-a-monster-with-massive-carbon-footprint-of-360-tour-14388326.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How green is your porridge?</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/dietandfitness/5292984/New-label-to-show-how-environmentally-friendly-your-porridge-is.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/dietandfitness/5292984/New-label-to-show-how-environmentally-friendly-your-porridge-is.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon abatement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=59246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new eco-label in the UK will show consumers the carbon footprint of cooking a product.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/dietandfitness/5292984/New-label-to-show-how-environmentally-friendly-your-porridge-is.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limiting the Internet&#8217;s carbon footprint</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/may/03/internet-carbon-footprint</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/may/03/internet-carbon-footprint#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 03:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=55221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists estimate that the energy footprint of the Internetis growing by more than 10% every year, and it could get out of control.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/may/03/internet-carbon-footprint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of the Planet</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/04/state-of-the-planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/04/state-of-the-planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangered mountain gorillas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new scientist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Putting the s-x back into climate change ... Conservationists fear Congo gorilla massacre ... Fred’s footprint ... Climate change comes with some positives for agriculture ... How green is your beer? ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/04/state-of-the-planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How are you going to make millions from climate change?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/19/how-are-you-going-to-make-millions-from-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/19/how-are-you-going-to-make-millions-from-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative technology association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public transport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With climate change rewiring everything from global politics to our choice of light globes, there is an emerging market for energy efficient, eco-friendly, green-tinged good and services. Here, Crikey identifies gaps in the marketplace.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/19/how-are-you-going-to-make-millions-from-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Mitchell: That greenie Rupert won&#8217;t change our coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/28/chris-mitchell-that-greenie-rupert-wont-change-our-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/28/chris-mitchell-that-greenie-rupert-wont-change-our-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A memo to all staff from Chris Mitchell, editor-in-chief of <i>The Australian</i>, landed in our inbox yesterday. We think he doth protest too much ... ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/28/chris-mitchell-that-greenie-rupert-wont-change-our-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1271/1277 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 00:58:21 -->
