<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; carbon emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/carbon-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:57:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The real costs of Rudd&#8217;s CPRS are just starting to surface</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/the-real-costs-of-rudds-cprs-are-just-starting-to-surface/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/the-real-costs-of-rudds-cprs-are-just-starting-to-surface/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/the-real-costs-of-rudds-cprs-are-just-starting-to-surface/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government's climate change policy is incoherent and becoming ever more expensive, writes <b>Sinclair Davidson</b>. No amount of name-calling is going to change the fact that this policy is a lemon and needs to be radically reconsidered. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/the-real-costs-of-rudds-cprs-are-just-starting-to-surface/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copenhagen reality check #1: 25% by 2020 isn&#8217;t in the ball park</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/04/copenhagen-reality-check-1-25-by-2020-isnt-in-the-ball-park/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/04/copenhagen-reality-check-1-25-by-2020-isnt-in-the-ball-park/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garnaut Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/04/copenhagen-reality-check-1-25-by-2020-isnt-in-the-ball-park/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can bet your house that Copenhagen will not conclude with a 25% mandatory target for all the developed economies. But is that even what we need to do, or is the whole of the Copenhagen process wrapped in an enormous delusion? asks <b>David Spratt</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/04/copenhagen-reality-check-1-25-by-2020-isnt-in-the-ball-park/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCS Institute comes clean on clean coal</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Otter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In somewhat surprising and welcome candour, the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute's latest report suggests that there is a low likelihood of CCS being economically viable before 2030 to 2040, writes <b>Michael James</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/ccs-institute-comes-clean-on-clean-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At risk of banging on about this, we&#8217;re all going to die</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/22/at-risk-of-banging-on-about-this-were-all-going-to-die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/22/at-risk-of-banging-on-about-this-were-all-going-to-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clive Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/22/at-risk-of-banging-on-about-this-were-all-going-to-die/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It now seems certain that without urgent and more stringent emission cuts are within the next few years, humans will be powerless to stop the shift to a new climate on Earth.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/22/at-risk-of-banging-on-about-this-were-all-going-to-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20-20 vision needed on 2020 vision</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/20-20-vision-needed-on-2020-vision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/20-20-vision-needed-on-2020-vision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/20-20-vision-needed-on-2020-vision/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The climate debate as fostered by <em>Crikey</em> in 2009 has gone off the rails and is no longer a credible force for meaningful debate. It has joined the ranks of the political nutters, says <b>Simon Mansfield</b>.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/20-20-vision-needed-on-2020-vision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloggers beware &#8212; here comes the FTC</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Farmer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-17/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's Federal Trade Commission is cracking down on bloggers taking cash for comment, and how the global recession may have reduced carbon emissions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real cost of climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/02/crikey-says-99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/02/crikey-says-99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/02/crikey-says-99/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the World Bank released a report estimating the costs of battling climate change. It's around $75-100bn per year and doesn't include the costs for developing countries.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/02/crikey-says-99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The high price of carbon aid: a climate sleeper</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-high-price-of-carbon-aid-a-copenhagen-sleeper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-high-price-of-carbon-aid-a-copenhagen-sleeper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developmental aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions targets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-high-price-of-carbon-aid-a-copenhagen-sleeper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s not just carbon emission targets that will vex developed world governments in Copenhagen -- they also need to decide how much assistance to provide to developing countries.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-high-price-of-carbon-aid-a-copenhagen-sleeper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buildings responsible for up to 80% of emissions in our cities</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/11/buildings-responsible-for-up-to-80-of-emissions-in-our-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/11/buildings-responsible-for-up-to-80-of-emissions-in-our-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/10/buildings-responsible-for-up-to-80-of-emissions-in-our-cities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever the outcome of the Senate's vote next week on the CPRS bills, the sector of the economy that is responsible for more than a third of Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions, and up to 80% of emissions in our cities, won’t be affected.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/11/buildings-responsible-for-up-to-80-of-emissions-in-our-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Liberal fable: once upon a time on a small, blue planet &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/21/a-liberal-fable-once-upon-a-time-on-a-small-blue-planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/21/a-liberal-fable-once-upon-a-time-on-a-small-blue-planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/21/a-liberal-fable-once-upon-a-time-on-a-small-blue-planet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A small, relatively insignificant country in the planet’s southern hemisphere, which produces about 2% of the carbon causing the problems, is furiously debating how to move away from a dependence on carbon. Not that it will make a difference.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/21/a-liberal-fable-once-upon-a-time-on-a-small-blue-planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd&#8217;s CPRS is full of gaping holes</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/05/rudds-cprs-is-full-of-gaping-holes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/05/rudds-cprs-is-full-of-gaping-holes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=55506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rudd Government’s tweaking of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) does nothing to improve its environmental credibility, writes <b>Andrew Macintosh</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/05/rudds-cprs-is-full-of-gaping-holes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd Government is gutless on climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/23/rudd-government-is-gutless-on-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/23/rudd-government-is-gutless-on-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=52907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The impacts of climate change will be felt far sooner, and will be far more costly, for Australia than for the UK.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/23/rudd-government-is-gutless-on-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad news from Copenhagen: climate beyond worst case</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/15/bad-news-from-copenhagen-climate-beyond-worst-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/15/bad-news-from-copenhagen-climate-beyond-worst-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=51313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urgent action is needed now to decarbonise societies.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/15/bad-news-from-copenhagen-climate-beyond-worst-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuel reduction burns not included in Australia&#8217;s C02 accounting</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/fuel-reduction-burns-not-included-in-australias-c02-accounting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/fuel-reduction-burns-not-included-in-australias-c02-accounting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With huge fuel reduction burns planned for this fire season, <b>Crikey naturalist Lionel Elmore</b> asks why the carbon they create is being ignored by foresters and others.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/fuel-reduction-burns-not-included-in-australias-c02-accounting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mungo: Give it a go Garnaut</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/08/mungo-give-it-a-go-garnaut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/08/mungo-give-it-a-go-garnaut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brendan Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garnaut Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kyoto targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Garnaut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are now the worst per capita polluter on the planet, and gold medal winners tend to be noticed, wrties <b>Mungo MacCallum</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/08/mungo-give-it-a-go-garnaut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Garnaut&#8217;s target so low, the sea level will rise above it in a year</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/05/garnauts-target-so-low-the-sea-level-will-rise-above-it-in-a-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/05/garnauts-target-so-low-the-sea-level-will-rise-above-it-in-a-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garnaut Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Garnaut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tackling climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Garnaut's view Australia is too late to avoid “substantial impacts” which will, as he said in his dry economist’s tone, require “major adaptation", writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/05/garnauts-target-so-low-the-sea-level-will-rise-above-it-in-a-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drive your car, buy a new TV, save the planet</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/02/drive-your-car-buy-a-new-tv-save-the-planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/02/drive-your-car-buy-a-new-tv-save-the-planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic slowdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will a momentary break in the consumption of oil and the production of plasma screen TVs aid the fight against climate change, or hinder it? <b>Professor Quentin Grafton</b> tells.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/02/drive-your-car-buy-a-new-tv-save-the-planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to make Australia&#8217;s PNG Forest Partnership work</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/24/how-to-make-australias-png-forest-partnership-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/24/how-to-make-australias-png-forest-partnership-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papua New Guinea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rudd Government is continuing down Howard’s tropical forest protection road with the PNG-Australia Forest Carbon Partnership. But there could be stumbling blocks, writes <b>Paul Winn</b>, Greenpeace Forest and Climate campaigner]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/24/how-to-make-australias-png-forest-partnership-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming clean on &#8216;nice&#8217; coal</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/coming-clean-on-nice-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/coming-clean-on-nice-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CCS is experimental, unproven technology at the scale required, and if it works the majority of CCS deployment will not occur until the second half of this century, writes <b>David Spratt</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/coming-clean-on-nice-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments, corrections, clarifications, and c*ckups</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/07/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/07/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rudd's salute at NATO ... ABC complaints ... Rudd's 2020 Summit ... the AMA ... lobbyists and pork ... carbon caps and gas emissions ... ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/07/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments, corrections, clarifications, and c*ckups</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/04/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/04/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeschooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opes prime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opes Prime - more than meets the eye ... homeschooling ... carbon dioxide sequestration ... Rudd's diplomacy ... the ABC ... ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/04/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ocean acidity: another reason for cutting carbon</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/ocean-acidity-another-reason-for-cutting-carbon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/ocean-acidity-another-reason-for-cutting-carbon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean acidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ocean acidification is a global problem for which Australia clearly has a special responsibility, writes <b>Stephen Luntz</b>.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/ocean-acidity-another-reason-for-cutting-carbon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Farmer&#8217;s political bite-sized meaty chunks</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/22/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/22/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professor ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Garnaut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator mccain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Planning for no climate change agreement ... A sensible market reaction ... Governments suffer from rowdy scenes ... No trade unionists today ... The Daily Reality Check ... The Pick of This Morning's Political Coverage ... ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/22/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kyoto blog wrap: they love us, they really love us</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/04/kyoto-blog-wrap-they-love-us-they-really-love-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/04/kyoto-blog-wrap-they-love-us-they-really-love-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kyoto targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project for a new american century]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd's decision to ratify Kyoto led to applause at the UN and a Mexican wave across world media. Here's what some are saying today. 

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/04/kyoto-blog-wrap-they-love-us-they-really-love-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacCormack: Greens show up Howard on energy subsidies</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/23/maccormack-greens-show-up-howard-on-energy-subsidies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/23/maccormack-greens-show-up-howard-on-energy-subsidies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income earners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[runaway greenhouse effect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite how you encourage people to reduce their carbon emissions when you're subsidising their power usage isn't clear. It's like subsidising a smoker's cigarette costs because of all the taxes you've imposed on tobacco, writes David MacCormack.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/23/maccormack-greens-show-up-howard-on-energy-subsidies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
