<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; carbon emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/carbon-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A nasty set of numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/05/crikey-says-a-nasty-set-of-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/05/crikey-says-a-nasty-set-of-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 01:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global carbon project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=263219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A collection of sobering take home points from a consortium of climate scientists and economists from around the world -- the Global Carbon Project -- and their findings for 2010, published today in the journal Nature Climate Change.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/05/crikey-says-a-nasty-set-of-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why companies that worm their way into a carbon tax are winners</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/11/why-companies-that-worm-their-way-into-a-carbon-tax-are-winners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/11/why-companies-that-worm-their-way-into-a-carbon-tax-are-winners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no carbon tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=252053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The concept of irony just doesn't do justice to the twists, turns, deceit and rank hypocrisy that has accompanied the long, slow road to the introduction of a price on carbon in Australia, writes <b>Dr Richard Denniss</b>, executive director of Canberra-based think tank The Australia Institute.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/11/why-companies-that-worm-their-way-into-a-carbon-tax-are-winners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fear and greed &#8230; the real energy challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/17/clean-technology-china-solar-city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/17/clean-technology-china-solar-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 03:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jimmy carter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=241622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s curious to see how left-wing and right-wing politics have fallen on either side of the clean tech divide, particularly in the US and Australia, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/17/clean-technology-china-solar-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Come in Spinner: common and uncommon sense &#8212; who&#8217;d believe the latter?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/19/zara-retailer-everything-is-obvious-when-you-know-the-answe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/19/zara-retailer-everything-is-obvious-when-you-know-the-answe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 03:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel Turnbull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Come in Spinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tony abbot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=235718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Millions of Australians have been listening to, and reading, the predictions of political pundits, economic forecasters, broking firm analysts, experts and others about what might happen in politics and the world.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/19/zara-retailer-everything-is-obvious-when-you-know-the-answe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Look beyond a carbon price and examine whether your cuts will count</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/16/look-beyond-a-carbon-price-and-examine-whether-your-cuts-will-count/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/16/look-beyond-a-carbon-price-and-examine-whether-your-cuts-will-count/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and slicec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=229663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way in which the CPRS set both a cap above which emissions could not rise and a floor below which emissions could not fall was widely debated, if not widely understood, during 2009 and 2010. But those lessons need to be learnt again, writes <b>Dr Richard Denniss</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/16/look-beyond-a-carbon-price-and-examine-whether-your-cuts-will-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warming above 2° so far mitigated by accidental geo-engineering</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/06/global-warming-above-2%c2%b0-so-far-mitigated-by-accidental-geo-engineering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/06/global-warming-above-2%c2%b0-so-far-mitigated-by-accidental-geo-engineering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 03:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arctic sea ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melting glaciers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=226538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Science climate reports, global warming is already committed to a rise above two degrees, writes <b>Dr Andrew Glikson</b>, Earth and paleoclimate science, Australian National University]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/06/global-warming-above-2%c2%b0-so-far-mitigated-by-accidental-geo-engineering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you halve emissions by 2025? Look to the UK&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/05/19/uk-to-cut-emissions-by-50-by-2025/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/05/19/uk-to-cut-emissions-by-50-by-2025/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 03:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber Jamieson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European emissions trading scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK carbon emission cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=224223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United Kingdom is set to become a world leader on clean energy and climate policy, after announcing an ambitious plan to halve carbon emissions by 2025, reports <b>Amber Jamieson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/05/19/uk-to-cut-emissions-by-50-by-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Queensland: the carbon kings</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/19/queenslanders-kings-of-carbon-as-australian-co2-emissions-increase/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/19/queenslanders-kings-of-carbon-as-australian-co2-emissions-increase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=218617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New greenhouse data shows that even with the GFC and some one-off factors holding down emissions, Australia will miss its 5% carbon reduction target by 2020.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/19/queenslanders-kings-of-carbon-as-australian-co2-emissions-increase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The climate change disconnect</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/19/crikey-says-the-climate-change-disconnect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/19/crikey-says-the-climate-change-disconnect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=218578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a bizarre disconnection between the climate change debate in Australia and reality, with Australia's emissions continuing to grow.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/19/crikey-says-the-climate-change-disconnect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A hot pink climate no laughing matter</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/13/hot-pink-climate-no-laughing-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/13/hot-pink-climate-no-laughing-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arctic sea ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frozen sea ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melting glaciers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=217366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do climate scientists have a sense of humour, asks author <b>David Spratt</b>?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/13/hot-pink-climate-no-laughing-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleaner energy: the global power shift</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/12/parkinson-the-global-power-shift/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/12/parkinson-the-global-power-shift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rising oil prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=217095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our politicians have been labouring under beliefs born under a credo of Western pre-eminence, and cheap oil and cheap debt, that has helped fashion our policies towards climate change, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b> of <a href="http://www.climatespectator.com.au" target="_blank"><em>Climate Spectator</em></a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/12/parkinson-the-global-power-shift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parkinson: Garnaut&#8217;s inconvenient truths</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/15/parkinson-garnauts-inconvenient-truths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/15/parkinson-garnauts-inconvenient-truths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 02:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garnaut Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Combet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=203711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first three instalments of Professor Ross Garnaut’s update to his Climate Change Review have been a welcome boost to the government’s ability to press its case for a carbon price, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b>, of Climate Spectator.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/15/parkinson-garnauts-inconvenient-truths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for Aussie pride in carbon reduction</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/11/30/cmon-aussie-cmon-seriously-cmon/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/11/30/cmon-aussie-cmon-seriously-cmon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancun UN climate change conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=189861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As day three of the UN climate talks in Cancun, Mexico kicks off, <b>Anna Rose</b> takes a stroll through a community garden in Syria, looking at local initiatives for global problems. Yet Australia lags behind with the false "the world isn’t acting, Australia shouldn’t lead" climate change line.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/11/30/cmon-aussie-cmon-seriously-cmon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FOI lifts veil on our ignorance of international pollution action</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/30/foi-lifts-veil-on-our-ignorance-of-international-pollution-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/30/foi-lifts-veil-on-our-ignorance-of-international-pollution-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancun UN climate change conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=189580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lead veil is shielding commentators from the extent of international action on pollution and climate change, writes  <b>John Connor</b>, CEO The Climate Institute.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/30/foi-lifts-veil-on-our-ignorance-of-international-pollution-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Combet: opposition to a carbon price will force up electricity prices</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/12/combet-opposition-to-a-carbon-price-will-force-up-electricity-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/12/combet-opposition-to-a-carbon-price-will-force-up-electricity-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=177775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Combet, the federal Minister for Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, today  delivered the keynote address to Carbon Expo Australasia 2010 in Melbourne.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/12/combet-opposition-to-a-carbon-price-will-force-up-electricity-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In smoggy Tianjin, &#8216;structural imbalance&#8217; is the hot topic</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/06/in-smoggy-tianjin-structural-imbalance-is-the-hot-topic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/06/in-smoggy-tianjin-structural-imbalance-is-the-hot-topic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 02:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china environment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=176588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Day two of UN climate talks in heavily-polluted Tianjin fittingly started with a side event on coal use in China. Burning coal and the "structural imbalance" of energy use is the hot topic, writes <b>Owen Pascoe</b>, who is at the talks for the Australian Conservation Foundation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/06/in-smoggy-tianjin-structural-imbalance-is-the-hot-topic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon-free reporting? Not when it&#8217;s about old king coal&#8217;s new palace</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/17/carbon-free-reporting-not-when-its-about-old-king-coals-new-palace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/17/carbon-free-reporting-not-when-its-about-old-king-coals-new-palace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal fired power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queensland government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=165157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers of media reports on the Queensland government's go-ahead late last week for the Caval Ridge coal mine in Queensland could be forgiven for thinking that the BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA) project will be carbon free, writes Bob Burton, a Hobart-based freelance journalist.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/17/carbon-free-reporting-not-when-its-about-old-king-coals-new-palace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Farmer&#8217;s chunky bits: Gillard singing Swannie&#8217;s praises</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/27/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-gillard-singing-swannies-praises/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/27/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-gillard-singing-swannies-praises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Farmer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Swan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=157897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Losing the economic debate but keeping Wayne. Treasurer Wayne Swan can be forgiven for thinking that there is no justice in politics. Here he is, the man who acted so promptly and correctly to keep Australia free from the ravages of the international financial crisis, finding himself in the position where the mob are judging [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/27/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-gillard-singing-swannies-praises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mandatory CO2 emissions &#8212; will Gillard do enough?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/27/mandatory-co2-emissions-will-gillard-do-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/27/mandatory-co2-emissions-will-gillard-do-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=157750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government’s take on mandatory emissions is far from perfect. In fact it verges on feeble, writes <b>Alan Davies</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/27/mandatory-co2-emissions-will-gillard-do-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The battle for a greener California &#8212; what can Australia learn?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/14/the-battle-for-a-greener-california-what-can-australia-learn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/14/the-battle-for-a-greener-california-what-can-australia-learn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions reductions target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=152911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The war between high-emitting industries and low and zero-emitting sectors over climate change policies has been largely waged by proxy. Now, in the US, they are preparing for pitched battle, writes <em>Climate Spectator's</em> <b>Giles Parkinson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/14/the-battle-for-a-greener-california-what-can-australia-learn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How air-conditioning changed the world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/books/nonfiction/index.html?story=/books/feature/2010/07/05/losing_our_cool_air_conditioning_ext2010</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/books/nonfiction/index.html?story=/books/feature/2010/07/05/losing_our_cool_air_conditioning_ext2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air conditioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=150926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Air-conditioning is one powerful invention. Its use feeds its future use, thanks to the emissions it produces. And air-conditioning is to blame for the rise of conservative politics in the US. Seriously.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/books/nonfiction/index.html?story=/books/feature/2010/07/05/losing_our_cool_air_conditioning_ext2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to drive green</title>
		<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2010-05-21-ask-umbras-pearls-of-wisdom-on-green-driving-habits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grist.org/article/2010-05-21-ask-umbras-pearls-of-wisdom-on-green-driving-habits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 07:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Living without a car is not always a viable option, but there are still ways of driving and being green. Like, turn off your car rather than leaving it idle when you drop the DVDs off. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grist.org/article/2010-05-21-ask-umbras-pearls-of-wisdom-on-green-driving-habits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Travel is too cheap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/back-in-a-bit/2010/05/21/the-inside-travel-should-be-even-more-expensive/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/back-in-a-bit/2010/05/21/the-inside-travel-should-be-even-more-expensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 06:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food & Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luggage allowance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=140512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Airlines should charge for <em>every</em> kilo of luggage we take with us, including carry-on, says <b>Darrell Wade</b>, CEO of Intrepid Travel. Why? Because less luggage, less fuel.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/back-in-a-bit/2010/05/21/the-inside-travel-should-be-even-more-expensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bureaucracy: the real pollutant</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/cap-and-trade-our-way-out-of-red-tape-pollution/story-e6frg6zo-1225868389302</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/cap-and-trade-our-way-out-of-red-tape-pollution/story-e6frg6zo-1225868389302#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour market deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red tape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=139531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our government is a mess of red tape and regulations. If we applied a cap and trade scheme to bureaucracy, perhaps we could actually get policies put into action, says <b>Oliver Marc Hartwich</b><b>.</b>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/cap-and-trade-our-way-out-of-red-tape-pollution/story-e6frg6zo-1225868389302/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why trains are superior to planes</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2010/apr/20/train-rail-st-moritz-switzerland?page=all</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2010/apr/20/train-rail-st-moritz-switzerland?page=all#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food & Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eyjafjallajokull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to the Eyjafjallajökull shambles, other travellers are starting to learn what <b>Ed Gillespie</b> has known for years: travelling overland is not just good for your eco-geek credentials. It's also a lovely way to recapture the romance of travel.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2010/apr/20/train-rail-st-moritz-switzerland?page=all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1618/1638 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 06:58:56 -->
