<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; carbon capture and sequestration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/carbon-capture-and-sequestration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New research brings focus back to forests, vegetation in climate debate</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/new-research-brings-focus-back-to-forests-vegetation-in-climate-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/new-research-brings-focus-back-to-forests-vegetation-in-climate-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Darling Basin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=235781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research released today in an article published in Science has shown that natural forests are far more significant carbon sinks that previously thought, writes Crikey naturalist <b>Lionel Elmore</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/new-research-brings-focus-back-to-forests-vegetation-in-climate-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCS is doomed, yet we’ve pumped millions in to it</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/05/20/ccs-is-doomed-yet-weve-pumped-millions-in-to-it/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/05/20/ccs-is-doomed-yet-weve-pumped-millions-in-to-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Capture and Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=224432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is often seen as coal's redeeming feature and saviour, and governments have spent millions on it. But if it's so effective, why did the last budget cut over $600 million from CCS projects? asks <b>Dan Cass.</b>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/05/20/ccs-is-doomed-yet-weve-pumped-millions-in-to-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Danger in not recognising carbon carrying capacity in wild landscapes</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/22/danger-in-not-recognising-carbon-carrying-capacity-in-wild-landscapes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/22/danger-in-not-recognising-carbon-carrying-capacity-in-wild-landscapes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous communities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=212207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The remote location of Aboriginal communities combined with their local knowledge becomes an economic advantage rather than a liability when controlling feral animals, writes Crikey naturalist <b>Lionel Elmore</b>, who worked on east coast of Cape York in the early 1990s.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/22/danger-in-not-recognising-carbon-carrying-capacity-in-wild-landscapes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon capture: a lost cause?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/20/carbon-capture-a-lost-cause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/20/carbon-capture-a-lost-cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Bligh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=193937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Bligh Government at least temporarily pulling the plug, the question begs: does carbon capture technology have a viable future? <em>Crikey</em> intern Alexandra Patrikios asks the experts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/20/carbon-capture-a-lost-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change &#8230; the business schism grows</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/29/climate-change-the-business-schism-grows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/29/climate-change-the-business-schism-grows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=159143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EU’s future competitive advantage lies in encouraging and enabling its businesses to help drive the transformational change that will occur in the world economy within the next couple of decades, not to hide from it, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b>, from Climate Spectator.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/29/climate-change-the-business-schism-grows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saving forests won&#8217;t save the planet</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/dont-count-your-trees-forests-arent-that-green/story-e6frg6zo-1225826508034</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/dont-count-your-trees-forests-arent-that-green/story-e6frg6zo-1225826508034#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that forests don't store anywhere near as much carbon dioxide as previously thought, poking major holes in both the Government and Coalition's climate change policies. Back to the drawing board, says <b>Gary Johns</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/dont-count-your-trees-forests-arent-that-green/story-e6frg6zo-1225826508034/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No carbon storage under our house, thanks</title>
		<link>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33837127/ns/us_news-environment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33837127/ns/us_news-environment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal dutch shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Netherlands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=98452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dutch government wants to pump 10 million tons of carbon dioxide under the small town of Barendrecht in an effort to fight global warming. Local residents are a bit less enthused about the idea.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33837127/ns/us_news-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testing the outcomes of Rudd&#8217;s clean coal pledge</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/13/testing-the-outcomes-of-rudds-clean-coal-pledge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/13/testing-the-outcomes-of-rudds-clean-coal-pledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clive Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/13/testing-the-outcomes-of-rudds-clean-coal-pledge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on the best case scenarios when it comes to the full implementation of clean coal technology -- let's look at what the G8 leaders are applauding.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/13/testing-the-outcomes-of-rudds-clean-coal-pledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd scores global coup on carbon capture</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/10/rudd-scores-global-coup-on-carbon-capture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/10/rudd-scores-global-coup-on-carbon-capture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/10/rudd-scores-global-coup-on-carbon-capture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the world turned its back on coal because of carbon emissions, Australia would sustain significant economic damage, <b>Bernard Keane</b> explains the significance of carbon capture and storage for our nation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/10/rudd-scores-global-coup-on-carbon-capture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate spending won&#8217;t restore Rudd&#8217;s climate credibility</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/13/climate-spending-wont-restore-rudds-climate-credibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/13/climate-spending-wont-restore-rudds-climate-credibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 09 analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewables Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudd government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=57994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The downside of the Clean Energy Initiative – and the Rudd Government’s climate policy more generally – is the weighting given to coal interests, writes <b>Andrew Macintosh</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/13/climate-spending-wont-restore-rudds-climate-credibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More smoke and mirrors from the coal lobby</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/06/more-smoke-and-mirrors-from-the-coal-lobby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/06/more-smoke-and-mirrors-from-the-coal-lobby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael R James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=55895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happened to the analyses by Nicholas Stern and Ross Garnaut who showed that spending big on renewable energy could be a net benefit to the economy? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/06/more-smoke-and-mirrors-from-the-coal-lobby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon capture and storage is an expensive pipe dream</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael R James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Tinto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xstrata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=51788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon capture and storage may be possible, but it certainly does not look commercially feasible.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Coal Association: climate change is happening and fast</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those convinced climate change is some left-wing scam would do well to click over to what our biggest polluting industries are saying, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon capture: a last minute stab of desperation</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/carbon-capture-a-last-minute-stab-of-desperation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/carbon-capture-a-last-minute-stab-of-desperation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s the climate change holdouts in each country that are pushing carbon capture in the hope they can stave off the switch to renewables, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/carbon-capture-a-last-minute-stab-of-desperation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green is the colour of money</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The announcement of a $100 million research centre to focus on clean coal technology options is a welcome move by the federal government, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capturing the carbon from coal: Should we? Shouldn&#8217;t we?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crikey spoke to two experts with differing views about the viability, the benefits and the common sense of Australia pursuing a coal with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1156/1342 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 14:40:59 -->
