<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; carbon capture and sequestration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/carbon-capture-and-sequestration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Testing the outcomes of Rudd&#8217;s clean coal pledge</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/13/testing-the-outcomes-of-rudds-clean-coal-pledge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/13/testing-the-outcomes-of-rudds-clean-coal-pledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clive Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/13/testing-the-outcomes-of-rudds-clean-coal-pledge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on the best case scenarios when it comes to the full implementation of clean coal technology -- let's look at what the G8 leaders are applauding.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/13/testing-the-outcomes-of-rudds-clean-coal-pledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd scores global coup on carbon capture</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/10/rudd-scores-global-coup-on-carbon-capture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/10/rudd-scores-global-coup-on-carbon-capture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/10/rudd-scores-global-coup-on-carbon-capture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the world turned its back on coal because of carbon emissions, Australia would sustain significant economic damage, <b>Bernard Keane</b> explains the significance of carbon capture and storage for our nation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/10/rudd-scores-global-coup-on-carbon-capture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate spending won&#8217;t restore Rudd&#8217;s climate credibility</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/13/climate-spending-wont-restore-rudds-climate-credibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/13/climate-spending-wont-restore-rudds-climate-credibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 09 analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewables Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudd government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=57994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The downside of the Clean Energy Initiative – and the Rudd Government’s climate policy more generally – is the weighting given to coal interests, writes <b>Andrew Macintosh</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/13/climate-spending-wont-restore-rudds-climate-credibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More smoke and mirrors from the coal lobby</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/06/more-smoke-and-mirrors-from-the-coal-lobby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/06/more-smoke-and-mirrors-from-the-coal-lobby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=55895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happened to the analyses by Nicholas Stern and Ross Garnaut who showed that spending big on renewable energy could be a net benefit to the economy? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/06/more-smoke-and-mirrors-from-the-coal-lobby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon capture and storage is an expensive pipe dream</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Tinto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xstrata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=51788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon capture and storage may be possible, but it certainly does not look commercially feasible.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/17/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-an-expensive-pipe-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Coal Association: climate change is happening and fast</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those convinced climate change is some left-wing scam would do well to click over to what our biggest polluting industries are saying, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/12/australian-coal-association-climate-change-is-happening-and-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green is the colour of money</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The announcement of a $100 million research centre to focus on clean coal technology options is a welcome move by the federal government, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/green-is-the-colour-of-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capturing the carbon from coal: Should we? Shouldn&#8217;t we?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crikey spoke to two experts with differing views about the viability, the benefits and the common sense of Australia pursuing a coal with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/22/capturing-the-carbon-from-coal-should-we-shouldnt-we/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
