<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; bureaucracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/bureaucracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bureaucracy: the real pollutant</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/cap-and-trade-our-way-out-of-red-tape-pollution/story-e6frg6zo-1225868389302</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/cap-and-trade-our-way-out-of-red-tape-pollution/story-e6frg6zo-1225868389302#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour market deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red tape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=139531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our government is a mess of red tape and regulations. If we applied a cap and trade scheme to bureaucracy, perhaps we could actually get policies put into action, says <b>Oliver Marc Hartwich</b><b>.</b>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/cap-and-trade-our-way-out-of-red-tape-pollution/story-e6frg6zo-1225868389302/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kevin the bureaucrat and the petitions committee</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/kevin-the-bureaucrat-and-the-petitions-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/kevin-the-bureaucrat-and-the-petitions-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[getup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House of Representatives petitions committee, which could be used by the Opposition as a sort of mini-Estimates process if they had their wits about them, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/kevin-the-bureaucrat-and-the-petitions-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The boring, bureaucratic reality of COAG</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/26/the-boring-bureaucratic-reality-of-coag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/26/the-boring-bureaucratic-reality-of-coag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal state relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ministerial meetings sound like the pointy end of Commonwealth-State relations, but in reality, ministerial meetings are highly formal affairs, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/26/the-boring-bureaucratic-reality-of-coag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd&#8217;s new Ministry sticks to the Howard mould</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/30/rudds-new-ministry-sticks-to-the-howard-mould/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/30/rudds-new-ministry-sticks-to-the-howard-mould/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commonwealth health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health and ageing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Garrett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd's new Ministry has a familiar feel to it. As promised, it hasn't shaken up the Canberra bureaucracy too much, so that the pencil pushers can hit the ground running – well, sauntering – with the ALP agenda, writes David MacCormack.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/30/rudds-new-ministry-sticks-to-the-howard-mould/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where now for Liberal staffers? The mining boom?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/29/where-now-for-liberal-staffers-the-mining-boom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/29/where-now-for-liberal-staffers-the-mining-boom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keating government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional demeanor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vilified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ministerial advisers are well compensated with a respectable termination payment if they have served for a few years or more. And most are generally happy for a decent break after the rigorous pace of government. But it soon dawns on most that their skills are tough to transfer when they wear a Labor or conservative badge. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/29/where-now-for-liberal-staffers-the-mining-boom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it farmers being subsidised &#8211; or the water quota system?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/28/is-it-farmers-being-subsidised-or-the-water-quota-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/28/is-it-farmers-being-subsidised-or-the-water-quota-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family farmers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land title deeds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The drought assistance announced by the Federal Government this week is more than just bundles of cash aimed at helping out ruralists in need. It’s a reform package by another name, writes Lionel Elmore.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/28/is-it-farmers-being-subsidised-or-the-water-quota-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 669/743 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 02:09:21 -->
