<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; best case scenario</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/best-case-scenario/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chasing the 16 seats – the story so far</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/12/chasing-the-16-seats-the-story-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/12/chasing-the-16-seats-the-story-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best case scenario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worse case scenario]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, two thirds of the way through this campaign, what can we say? The commentariat appears to have been stung by its calls in 2001 and 2004, writes Christian Kerr.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/12/chasing-the-16-seats-the-story-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One election, one paper, so many opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/05/one-election-one-paper-so-many-opinions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/05/one-election-one-paper-so-many-opinions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best case scenario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marginal seats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moreso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Australia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's always a variety of opinion in <i>The Australian</i> and never more so than on Saturday morning when there were two very different interpretations of some Newspoll research into voting intentions in marginal seats, writes Richard Farmer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/05/one-election-one-paper-so-many-opinions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richardson: Labor turns its attention to the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/29/richardson-labor-turns-its-attention-to-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/29/richardson-labor-turns-its-attention-to-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best case scenario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on the contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate majority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labor has been trying hard to avoid the impression of overconfidence, but news at the weekend suggests that it too now regards the government's fate as a foregone conclusion, writes Charles Richardson.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/29/richardson-labor-turns-its-attention-to-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Family First can&#8217;t help Labor in the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/27/why-family-first-cant-help-labor-in-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/27/why-family-first-cant-help-labor-in-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best case scenario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's a story that won't go away: the idea that the ALP might again do a preference deal with the Assemblies of God party, Family First, despite the angst that it brought them in 2004. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/27/why-family-first-cant-help-labor-in-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 588/641 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 04:23:25 -->
