<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; bad science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/bad-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Organic food no healthier&#8221;? Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/todays-huge-flap-about-organics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/todays-huge-flap-about-organics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=77244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Organic food no healthier" <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/wellbeing/organic-food-no-healthier-study-20090730-e27z.html">blared</a> yesterday's headlines. Really? Only if you take a very narrow view of "health". <b>Dr Marion Nestle</b> looks at what the study <em>actually</em> says. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/todays-huge-flap-about-organics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HuffPo&#8216;s unhealthy quackery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/env/vital_signs/2009/07/30/huffington_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/env/vital_signs/2009/07/30/huffington_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arianna Huffington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complementary and alternative medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=77230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pay peanuts... It's one thing for <em>The Huffington Post</em>'s army of unpaid bloggers to pontificate on politics, but when it comes to science and medicine, it's just irresponsible to publish the crackpot theories of unqualified, self-appointed "experts" says doctor <b>Rahul K. Parikh</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/env/vital_signs/2009/07/30/huffington_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real CSI: the shaky science of forensics</title>
		<link>http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/4325774.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/4325774.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=76922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forensic "science" is a misnomer, says <em>Popular Mechanics</em>: it was developed by cops, not scientists, and now some embarrassing forensic failures are fueling calls for a rethink of the entire field.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/4325774.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oprah hits back at Newsweek</title>
		<link>http://www.hollyscoop.com/oprah/oprah-winfrey-fights-back-newsweek-claims_20447.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://www.hollyscoop.com/oprah/oprah-winfrey-fights-back-newsweek-claims_20447.aspx#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=64594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk-show queen Oprah Winfrey has hit back against <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/200025">this <em>Newsweek</em> article</a> that claims she promotes health "cures" that are dangerous and ineffective. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hollyscoop.com/oprah/oprah-winfrey-fights-back-newsweek-claims_20447.aspx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Research&#8221; finds The Simpsons &#8220;may&#8221; encourage smoking</title>
		<link>http://warmingglow.uproxx.com/2009/06/die-you-hippie-a-holes/</link>
		<comments>http://warmingglow.uproxx.com/2009/06/die-you-hippie-a-holes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Simpsons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=64118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh man.  Some jackass eggheads took notes while watching every episode of <em>The Simpsons</em> and they came to the conclusion that the show may cause children to start smoking.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warmingglow.uproxx.com/2009/06/die-you-hippie-a-holes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coffee is good for you (or if you do enough research you can prove anything)</title>
		<link>http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-he-coffee18-2009may18,0,7483815.column</link>
		<comments>http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-he-coffee18-2009may18,0,7483815.column#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=59637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go ahead: That cup of joe won't hurt you, the latest research says. It might even help you. But caveat emptor, it's not as simple as it sounds. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-he-coffee18-2009may18,0,7483815.column/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 678/753 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 03:38:20 -->
