<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Australian Industrial Relations Commission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/australian-industrial-relations-commission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The fairly quiet Fair Work Week</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2791429.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2791429.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Industrial Relations Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Work Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A whole new set of federal laws about industrial relations has slid into being this week with very little fanfare. <b>Anne Junor</b> explains exactly what the changes entail for employees and employers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2791429.htm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Fast Food award deny youth jobs?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/currentaccount/index.php/theaustralian/comments/penalty_strike_on_jobs</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/currentaccount/index.php/theaustralian/comments/penalty_strike_on_jobs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Industrial Relations Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[award wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast food industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=53700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Changes to the Fast Food Industry Award will make it more expensive to hire young workers. <b>Michael Stutchbury</b> claims it's "madness".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/currentaccount/index.php/theaustralian/comments/penalty_strike_on_jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industry super funds in AIRC bonanza</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/07/industry-super-funds-in-airc-bonanza/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/07/industry-super-funds-in-airc-bonanza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Industrial Relations Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Sherry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buried amid the Industrial Relations Commission's awards modernisation program was a curious ruling on superannuation, writes <b>Stephen Bartholomeusz</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/07/industry-super-funds-in-airc-bonanza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WorkChoices v Forward with Fairness: a photo finish</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/workchoices-v-forward-with-fairness-a-photo-finish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/workchoices-v-forward-with-fairness-a-photo-finish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Industrial Relations Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work choices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most observers agree that when the politics is stripped out and policy is analyzed, Forward with Fairness adopts a large percentage of Work Choices, writes <b>Ken Phillips</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/22/workchoices-v-forward-with-fairness-a-photo-finish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The push to weaken director’s liability continues</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/13/the-push-to-weaken-directors-liability-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/13/the-push-to-weaken-directors-liability-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Industrial Relations Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Institute of Company Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institute of company directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsw industrial relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presumption of guilt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The push to weaken director’s liability is continuing, with former high-profile director, John Ralph, telling the AFR that he wouldn’t join company boards if he were retiring today. Ralph stated that "it seems a lot more fun to go into private equity where you can just get on with things."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/13/the-push-to-weaken-directors-liability-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Howard Government&#8217;s record of political appointments</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/29/the-howard-governments-record-of-political-appointments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/29/the-howard-governments-record-of-political-appointments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Industrial Relations Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christopher pearson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal magistrates court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorkChoices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The propensity to make controversial appointments to positions of authority in public agencies was one of the more contentious habits of the Howard government, writes Rebecca Harrison.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/29/the-howard-governments-record-of-political-appointments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey Policy Comparison Pt 11: Industrial Relations</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/19/crikey-policy-comparison-pt-11-industrial-relations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/19/crikey-policy-comparison-pt-11-industrial-relations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian industrial relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Industrial Relations Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian workplace agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gap coalition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you're looking for a major difference between the parties, this is it. As the government continues to defend its controversial WorkChoices policy, and the Fairness Test that it later introduced, the ALP have made the abolition of AWAs a central tenant of their campaign, with a little help from the highly successful Your Rights At Work. This is an issue with cut through, and there's a chasm of difference between the Coalition and ALP. And while there may be a certain jitteryness in business circles about the implications of a new Rudd government, the big bad WorkChoices line from the ALP seems to have hooked Howard's battlers back to their camp. Read on, and mind the gap.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/19/crikey-policy-comparison-pt-11-industrial-relations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 715/801 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 10:08:16 -->
