<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; also noted that</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/also-noted-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Morning Market Report</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/05/morning-market-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/05/morning-market-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[also noted that]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BHP Billiton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coca-Cola Amatil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kagara zinc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suncorp metway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The highlights and lowlights of this morning's sharemarket activity. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/05/morning-market-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reviewing history: Whose interpretation do we go by?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/27/reviewing-history-whose-interpretation-do-we-go-by/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/27/reviewing-history-whose-interpretation-do-we-go-by/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic historian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[also noted that]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appointment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curriculum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Traditional views of the teaching of history have been superseded. One of the strengths of history as a discipline is that it is contestable – you have to weigh evidence to find out “what really happened”, not merely read a textbook interpretation of it, writes Nick Ewbank. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/27/reviewing-history-whose-interpretation-do-we-go-by/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
