<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; aged care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/aged-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Aged care investors brace for impact</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/19/aged-care-investors-brace-for-impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/19/aged-care-investors-brace-for-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aged care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[village life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investors in a group of retirement village schemes face an exceedingly difficult choice this week with potentially devastating implications, writes <b>Michael Feller</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/19/aged-care-investors-brace-for-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is HRT good or bad? Who do we trust?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/04/is-hrt-good-or-bad-who-do-we-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/04/is-hrt-good-or-bad-who-do-we-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aged care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only a fortnight ago, newspaper headlines were telling us that “world experts declare HRT safe for women in early menopause”. This week, it’s been headlines sounding the alarm about the possible links between HRT and breast cancer. What's right? asks <b>Melissa Sweet</b>.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/04/is-hrt-good-or-bad-who-do-we-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geriatric health assessments are a waste of health money</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/geriatric-health-assessments-are-a-waste-of-health-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/geriatric-health-assessments-are-a-waste-of-health-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aged care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current scheme for funding GP assessments of the elderly was deemed ineffective, and has blown out its budget by $93.7 million, But the government's thrown more cash at it in the new budget.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/geriatric-health-assessments-are-a-waste-of-health-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The next Budget leak should be good news for the aged</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/02/the-next-budget-leak-should-be-good-news-for-the-aged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/02/the-next-budget-leak-should-be-good-news-for-the-aged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aged care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aged-care funding needs a more realistic basis, argues <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/02/the-next-budget-leak-should-be-good-news-for-the-aged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia Divided: Old v Young</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/09/australia-divided-old-v-young/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/09/australia-divided-old-v-young/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aged care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ageing population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia divided]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old v young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our continuing series examining the things that divide Australians, today we look at the gap between old and young. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/09/australia-divided-old-v-young/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walt Secord puts a bit of mate into aged care</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/26/walt-secord-puts-a-bit-of-mate-into-aged-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/26/walt-secord-puts-a-bit-of-mate-into-aged-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aged care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Secord]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given that aged care is such an important and sensitive issue you'd think the federal minister would want advisers with expertise in aged care issues. Apparently not, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/26/walt-secord-puts-a-bit-of-mate-into-aged-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
