<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Tristan Edis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/author/tristanedis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What if Nick Xenophon decides our carbon future?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/05/23/what-if-nick-xenophon-decides-our-carbon-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/05/23/what-if-nick-xenophon-decides-our-carbon-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 federal election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Xenophon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=372852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Nick Xenophon holds the balance of power in the Senate after the election, climate change policy will get very interesting. Here's one possible scenario -- which sees an ETS return, but in a different form.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/05/23/what-if-nick-xenophon-decides-our-carbon-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A free kick for Abbott? Carbon accounting for Direct Action</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/05/17/a-free-kick-for-abbott-carbon-accounting-for-direct-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/05/17/a-free-kick-for-abbott-carbon-accounting-for-direct-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 23:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct action plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions reductions target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[native vegetation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=371396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A change to the way Australia’s emissions are accounted for could make it a lot easier for us to meet our 2020 emissions reduction target. It may prove to be a big gift to the Coalition.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/05/17/a-free-kick-for-abbott-carbon-accounting-for-direct-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why business wants the carbon price to stay</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/04/26/why-business-wants-the-carbon-price-to-stay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/04/26/why-business-wants-the-carbon-price-to-stay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=366332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With questions hanging over the Coalition's climate policy, it's becoming obvious the business community wants the carbon price to stay. Here's four reasons why ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/04/26/why-business-wants-the-carbon-price-to-stay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hold the panic over the EU carbon price plunge</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/04/18/eu-carbon-trading-and-why-gillard-cant-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/04/18/eu-carbon-trading-and-why-gillard-cant-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 01:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Council of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU carbon trading scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=364366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Claims Australia's carbon price is in terrible trouble due to the price plunge in Europe's carbon scheme need to be seen for what they are. Australia's polluters have a sweet deal from our carbon price, and they know it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/04/18/eu-carbon-trading-and-why-gillard-cant-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Power Index: carbon cutters, Anthea Harris at #2</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/03/20/the-power-index-carbon-cutters-anthea-harris-at-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/03/20/the-power-index-carbon-cutters-anthea-harris-at-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 01:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Cutters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THE POWER INDEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthea Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontier economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsw ggas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=356894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthea Harris has arguably been more involved in pricing carbon pollution than anyone else in Australia. How does the Climate Change Authority chief and veteran carbon adviser get things done in this fraught, controversial field? A background in consulting helped.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/03/20/the-power-index-carbon-cutters-anthea-harris-at-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Power Index: carbon cutters, Michael Fraser at #3</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/03/19/the-power-index-carbon-cutters-michael-fraser-at-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/03/19/the-power-index-carbon-cutters-michael-fraser-at-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 01:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Cutters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THE POWER INDEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael fraser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=356605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Fraser has a dual personality: he heads up a company with a massive carbon footprint that is also heavily involved in renewable energy. So why is he walking both sides of the line -- and how did this quiet company man rise to the top? <a href="http://www.climatespectator.com.au" target="_blank"><em>Climate Spectator</em></a> and <em>Crikey</em> investigate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/03/19/the-power-index-carbon-cutters-michael-fraser-at-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Germany now done with renewable energy?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/25/is-germany-done-with-renewable-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/25/is-germany-done-with-renewable-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=351344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two German politicians are keen to rein in feed-in tariff support for renewable energy in Germany. But that doesn't mean the European powerhouse is done with clean energy altogether.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/25/is-germany-done-with-renewable-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No denying coal&#8217;s developed world decline</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/18/no-denying-coals-developed-world-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/18/no-denying-coals-developed-world-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal fired power stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power generators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=349470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's no hiding from coal's long-term decline in Europe and the United States, irrespective of cherry-picked data floating around cyberspace about a coal revival. Don't believe what you read.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/18/no-denying-coals-developed-world-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abbott&#8217;s adviser hates wind farms, doubts climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/01/29/abbotts-adviser-hates-wind-farms-doubts-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/01/29/abbotts-adviser-hates-wind-farms-doubts-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=345065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony Abbott's latest Coalition policy statement remains short on climate policy detail. More worrying is his selection of a noted anti-wind farm advocate and climate change sceptic as lead business adviser.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/01/29/abbotts-adviser-hates-wind-farms-doubts-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Abbott&#8217;s axe really kill carbon trading in Australia?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/01/24/will-abbotts-axe-really-kill-carbon-trading-in-australia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/01/24/will-abbotts-axe-really-kill-carbon-trading-in-australia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=344435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony Abbott is likely to rescind the current cap-and-trade legislation if he wins the next election, but it's easy to see the potential for a new carbon pricing scheme to develop out of the stump his axe created.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/01/24/will-abbotts-axe-really-kill-carbon-trading-in-australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A year of scare: how the carbon tax played out</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/18/a-year-of-scare-how-the-carbon-tax-played-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/18/a-year-of-scare-how-the-carbon-tax-played-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=338768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The scare campaign around the carbon price has been demonstrated to be a complete hoax. But it took 12 months of painful debate to get there. Here's how the year in emissions reduction played out.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/18/a-year-of-scare-how-the-carbon-tax-played-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Gillard can&#8217;t prevent gold-plating energy infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/03/why-gillard-cant-prevent-gold-plating-energy-infrastructure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/03/why-gillard-cant-prevent-gold-plating-energy-infrastructure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 01:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power privatisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=335397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julia Gillard has launched a media offensive on power prices, but her proposals -- largely plagiarised -- fall well short of her claim of banishing "gold plating". Useful reform appears some way off.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/03/why-gillard-cant-prevent-gold-plating-energy-infrastructure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewable energy hit by an irrelevant debate</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/26/renewable-energy-hit-by-an-irrelevant-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/26/renewable-energy-hit-by-an-irrelevant-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 01:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Origin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=333616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should the renewable energy target be reduced? Origin Energy is calling it for it to be a "real" 20% share of the market, but just how does one classify "real"?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/26/renewable-energy-hit-by-an-irrelevant-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why 4 degrees will end the world as we know it: World Bank</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/20/why-4-degrees-will-end-the-world-as-we-know-it-world-bank-warning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/20/why-4-degrees-will-end-the-world-as-we-know-it-world-bank-warning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLITICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=332161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The World Bank has produced an alarming report that puts in context the risks of inaction on emissions reduction and climate change. It doesn't make for pleasant reading.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/20/why-4-degrees-will-end-the-world-as-we-know-it-world-bank-warning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Ferguson in a parallel universe or just the real world?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/16/martin-ferguson-in-a-parallel-universe-or-just-the-real-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/16/martin-ferguson-in-a-parallel-universe-or-just-the-real-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=331500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The present path is that China and India will be gobbling up all the growth in coal, and nearly all the growth in oil. Will we fight to combat climate change or make stacks of cash selling coal to Asia?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/16/martin-ferguson-in-a-parallel-universe-or-just-the-real-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In a global energy glut, what next for emissions?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/14/in-a-global-energy-glut-what-next-for-emissions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/14/in-a-global-energy-glut-what-next-for-emissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global environment outlook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=330835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to a boom in oil and gas from shale by around 2020, the United States is projected to become the largest global oil producer. That's concerning for the environment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/14/in-a-global-energy-glut-what-next-for-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Little hope in Obama for climate action in this economy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/08/little-hope-in-obama-for-climate-action-in-this-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/08/little-hope-in-obama-for-climate-action-in-this-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 US Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After winning four more years, Barack Obama again represents hope for a global carbon pricing scheme. Just don't count on it until the economy is much healthier.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/08/little-hope-in-obama-for-climate-action-in-this-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to take the heat out of electricity prices</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/02/how-to-take-the-heat-out-of-electricity-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/02/how-to-take-the-heat-out-of-electricity-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=327876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the talk about power bills there is unique opportunity for reform. But if governments overreact it could make things worse]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/02/how-to-take-the-heat-out-of-electricity-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did climate change create the &#8216;Frankenstorm&#8217;? It didn&#8217;t help</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/31/did-climate-change-create-the-frankenstorm-it-didnt-help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/31/did-climate-change-create-the-frankenstorm-it-didnt-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change activities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipcc scenarios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=327257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global warming may not have caused the Frankenstorm but it is loading the dice so the devastating flooding just witnessed becomes a lot more likely in future.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/31/did-climate-change-create-the-frankenstorm-it-didnt-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How heavy industry actually profits from the RET</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/10/how-heavy-industry-actually-profits-from-the-ret/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/10/how-heavy-industry-actually-profits-from-the-ret/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 23:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power generators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=321643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government's sweetener offsets to ease the pain the renewable energy target for energy-intensive industries may actually overshoot the predicted rise in electricity costs.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/10/how-heavy-industry-actually-profits-from-the-ret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emissions trading hangs by a chad in Obama&#8217;s fight</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/09/emissions-trading-hangs-by-a-chad-in-obamas-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/09/emissions-trading-hangs-by-a-chad-in-obamas-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=321316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The environmental future isn't a major debate topic during US presidential elections. But perhaps it should be.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/09/emissions-trading-hangs-by-a-chad-in-obamas-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Generators gamed in the power price fight</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/26/generators-gamed-in-the-power-price-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/26/generators-gamed-in-the-power-price-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Domanski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=318462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incumbent power suppliers have so much at stake with electricity regulation they can buy more and better muscle to define the house rules. They tend to ultimately prevail.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/26/generators-gamed-in-the-power-price-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why power generators suddenly care about consumers</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/21/why-power-generators-suddenly-care-about-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/21/why-power-generators-suddenly-care-about-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricty demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Origin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy and science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRUenergy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=317407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dominant incumbent power generators (with the exception of AGL) are all gunning for the Renewable Energy Target to be slashed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/21/why-power-generators-suddenly-care-about-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How crippling the RET could cost you</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/18/how-crippling-the-ret-could-cost-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/18/how-crippling-the-ret-could-cost-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 03:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agl energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRUenergy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=316615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slashing the RET could actually increase overall costs to consumers. And it appears TRUenergy -- which is now pushing for RET dilution -- agreed just a few months ago.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/18/how-crippling-the-ret-could-cost-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor called generators&#8217; bluff, so how hollow is its policy?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/07/labor-called-generators-bluff-so-how-hollow-is-its-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/07/labor-called-generators-bluff-so-how-hollow-is-its-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 01:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Edis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal fired power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts for closure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazelwood power station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy & science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yallourn generator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=314699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contracts for closure dealt with a (empty) threat by coal generators that the lights would go out. Now questions need to be asked whether Labor's policy is empty.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/07/labor-called-generators-bluff-so-how-hollow-is-its-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1744/2013 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2013-05-25 23:09:53 -->