<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Jane Caro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/author/janecarocrikey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is the media coverage of Jill Meagher over the top?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/03/14/jane-caro-is-the-media-coverage-of-jill-meagher-appropriate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/03/14/jane-caro-is-the-media-coverage-of-jill-meagher-appropriate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Caro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assaults on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jill Meagher murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reeva Steenkamp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=355644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a beautiful young woman is murdered, it reminds of us the dark side of being human. But is the media's salacious coverage of such tragic events justified?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/03/14/jane-caro-is-the-media-coverage-of-jill-meagher-appropriate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After shaky start, 2012 a triumph for feminism</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/20/caro-after-shaky-start-2012-a-triumph-for-feminism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/20/caro-after-shaky-start-2012-a-triumph-for-feminism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Caro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=339461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite all the claims that feminism is dead, 2012 proved a landmark year for women around the world -- from Julia Gillard's misogyny speech to Hillary Clinton. Is social media facilitating a new wave of feminism?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/20/caro-after-shaky-start-2012-a-triumph-for-feminism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the term &#8216;mummy bloggers&#8217; should be banished</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/13/caro-why-the-term-mummy-bloggers-should-be-banished/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/13/caro-why-the-term-mummy-bloggers-should-be-banished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Caro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors' wives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mummy bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s-xism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=337733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The term "mummy bloggers" -- much in the news of late -- is patronising and sexist, and should be consigned to the rubbish bin.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/13/caro-why-the-term-mummy-bloggers-should-be-banished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How women voters became the kingmakers</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/08/caro-how-women-voters-became-the-kingmakers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/08/caro-how-women-voters-became-the-kingmakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 01:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Caro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 US Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama won 55% of the female vote, meaning it was women who decided this year's presidential election. Politicians who refuse to take women's concerns and freedoms seriously are now on notice.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/08/caro-how-women-voters-became-the-kingmakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An atheist in church: in propaganda, you can&#8217;t beat God</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/31/an-atheist-in-church-in-propaganda-you-cant-beat-god/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/31/an-atheist-in-church-in-propaganda-you-cant-beat-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 02:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Caro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funerals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=325586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it egotistical to want top billing at one's own funeral? Faced with the onslaught of propaganda in stained glass and frescos -- not to mention the sermon -- consider it lucky if you get mentioned at all.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/31/an-atheist-in-church-in-propaganda-you-cant-beat-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jane Caro: why Margie Abbott is bloody revolutionary</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/08/jane-caro-why-margie-abbott-is-bloody-revolutionary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/08/jane-caro-why-margie-abbott-is-bloody-revolutionary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 02:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Caro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margie Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=320940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Margie and Tony Abbott are more than welcome to join the ranks of the feminists. And the fact that they want to do so speaks volumes for the comeback of a movement written off by John Howard.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/10/08/jane-caro-why-margie-abbott-is-bloody-revolutionary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 739/820 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2013-05-25 01:06:46 -->