<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Eva Cox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/author/evacox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The media release the minister should&#8217;ve written on the NT Intervention</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/19/the-media-release-the-minister-shouldve-written-on-the-nt-intervention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/19/the-media-release-the-minister-shouldve-written-on-the-nt-intervention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=253633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a draft alternative media release for Jenny Macklin -- what she should have said as a response to the current consultation rather than harping on about truancy and grog. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/19/the-media-release-the-minister-shouldve-written-on-the-nt-intervention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: fairness agenda takes a back seat at tax forum</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/06/cox-fairness-agenda-takes-a-back-seat-at-tax-forum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/06/cox-fairness-agenda-takes-a-back-seat-at-tax-forum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=251201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was the tax forum where the fairness agenda was lost, at least from the government side.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/06/cox-fairness-agenda-takes-a-back-seat-at-tax-forum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: social and gender equity way down on the tax forum agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/03/cox-social-and-gender-equity-way-down-on-the-tax-forum-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/03/cox-social-and-gender-equity-way-down-on-the-tax-forum-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=250192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears social and gender equity will be well down the tax forum agenda. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/03/cox-social-and-gender-equity-way-down-on-the-tax-forum-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women lumped with thin end of retirement wedge</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/20/women-lumped-with-thin-end-of-retirement-wedge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/20/women-lumped-with-thin-end-of-retirement-wedge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal superannuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=248018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ABS has again produced data that shows women are lagging badly behind men in one of the pillars of our retirement income. This is because our highly subsidised superannuation system is based on pre-retirement earnings.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/20/women-lumped-with-thin-end-of-retirement-wedge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: broadening the boardroom options</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/09/eva-cox-on-feminism-in-the-workplace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/09/eva-cox-on-feminism-in-the-workplace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolyn Hewson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=246075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the failures of feminism has been our inability to change the culture of most workplaces.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/09/eva-cox-on-feminism-in-the-workplace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignoring evidence may explain why the income management gap doesn’t close</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/26/ignoring-evidence-may-explain-why-the-income-management-gap-doesn%e2%80%99t-close/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/26/ignoring-evidence-may-explain-why-the-income-management-gap-doesn%e2%80%99t-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 03:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centrelink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAHCSIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Income Management Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=243084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Productivity Commission releases its latest report on Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage, which shows only 13 of 45 measures showed any improvement and seven went backwards.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/26/ignoring-evidence-may-explain-why-the-income-management-gap-doesn%e2%80%99t-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: why is equal pay so difficult to achieve?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/22/cox-why-is-equal-pay-so-difficult-to-achieve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/22/cox-why-is-equal-pay-so-difficult-to-achieve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Work laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitlam government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=242386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many women’s groups gear up for the annual unequal payday commiseration, more statistics emerge that suggest the gap may be going backwards, or, at best, is stuck.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/22/cox-why-is-equal-pay-so-difficult-to-achieve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does new evidence from NT women undermine supposed benefits of income management?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/19/does-new-evidence-from-nt-women-undermine-supposed-benefits-of-income-management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/19/does-new-evidence-from-nt-women-undermine-supposed-benefits-of-income-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 04:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basics Card']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Income Management Program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=242066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new research report, which has sought the views of more than 180 women in the NT, raises questions about income management’s level of support or perceptions of benefit.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/19/does-new-evidence-from-nt-women-undermine-supposed-benefits-of-income-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Them and us: why we need a fair society</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/12/london-riots-eva-cox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/12/london-riots-eva-cox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London riots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK riots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=240753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much of the debate over the UK riots has focused on the particulars of today and the recent past. They miss the wider implications of the effect of changes to the public ethos over the past few decades.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/12/london-riots-eva-cox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: new intervention proposals &#8230; same old, same old</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/24/cox-new-intervention-proposals-same-old-same-old/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/24/cox-new-intervention-proposals-same-old-same-old/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote aboriginal communities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=231048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new consultation process on more intervention proposals does not please the many critics of the current version’s costly failures.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/24/cox-new-intervention-proposals-same-old-same-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions Gillard should ask in Alice Springs, but probably won’t</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/07/questions-gillard-should-ask-in-alice-springs-but-probably-won%e2%80%99t/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/07/questions-gillard-should-ask-in-alice-springs-but-probably-won%e2%80%99t/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Springs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Closing the Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Income Management Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=227713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is four years this month since the Mal Brough emergency intervention in the NT and today the PM goes to Alice Springs to see the "progress" supposedly being made.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/07/questions-gillard-should-ask-in-alice-springs-but-probably-won%e2%80%99t/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget breakdown: making a society more fragile</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/20/budget-breakdown-making-a-society-more-fragile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/20/budget-breakdown-making-a-society-more-fragile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 03:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centrelink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newstart allowance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Swan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=224368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal budget uses social stereotyping to show the government as tough.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/20/budget-breakdown-making-a-society-more-fragile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: PM&#8217;s macho social agenda has balls but no heart</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/13/cox-pms-macho-social-agenda-has-balls-but-no-heart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/13/cox-pms-macho-social-agenda-has-balls-but-no-heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 03:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=223066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The whole Women's Budget statement is a paean of praise for the virtues of hard work and economic participation, like so much of the rest of the budget]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/13/cox-pms-macho-social-agenda-has-balls-but-no-heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welfare: government fails its social democracy obligations</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/11/welfare-government-fails-its-social-democracy-obligations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/11/welfare-government-fails-its-social-democracy-obligations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 03:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centrelink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=222511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not a Labor government budget in any serious sense. It does not take from the rich, except in very minor ways, and its redistributive tendencies are almost reversed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/11/welfare-government-fails-its-social-democracy-obligations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smarter budget cuts? Government to target the usual suspects</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/06/smarter-budget-cuts-government-to-target-the-usual-suspects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/06/smarter-budget-cuts-government-to-target-the-usual-suspects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 03:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 federal budget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=221243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the federal budget in the next week, there is the usual jockeying for headlines by various groups. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/06/smarter-budget-cuts-government-to-target-the-usual-suspects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NT Intervention: the divide between opinion and evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/29/nt-intervention-the-divide-between-opinion-and-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/29/nt-intervention-the-divide-between-opinion-and-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bess Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larissa Behrendt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=220104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The over-publicised tweet by Larissa Behrendt needs to be seen as part of a wider issue.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/29/nt-intervention-the-divide-between-opinion-and-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: Gillard&#8217;s preaching doesn&#8217;t offer salvation for unemployed</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/15/cox-gillards-preaching-doesnt-offer-salvation-for-unemployed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/15/cox-gillards-preaching-doesnt-offer-salvation-for-unemployed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC unemployment data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment figures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=218003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Labor by name and Labour by nature' may be a catchy title but it does little for those society excludes and then rejects. Julia Gillard ignores the evidence the problem with unemployment is as much a demand side problem as the fault of the unemployed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/15/cox-gillards-preaching-doesnt-offer-salvation-for-unemployed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When tax sends a powerful message of official values</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/13/when-tax-sends-a-powerful-message-of-official-values/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/13/when-tax-sends-a-powerful-message-of-official-values/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 03:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communist parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy hawkes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=217455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taxation is an essential part of our support for the public sphere.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/13/when-tax-sends-a-powerful-message-of-official-values/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problems with pushing new coercive employment policies</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/01/problems-with-pushing-new-coercive-employment-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/01/problems-with-pushing-new-coercive-employment-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobless data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobless figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare recipients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=215066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beware the welfare policy areas when we get bi-partisanship.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/01/problems-with-pushing-new-coercive-employment-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Push for higher super contributions using women as stalking horse</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/30/push-for-higher-super-contributions-using-women-as-stalking-horse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/30/push-for-higher-super-contributions-using-women-as-stalking-horse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low income earners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=214351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look carefully at who is pushing for the rise in super contributions to 12%. The clear beneficiaries will be the finance industry, union funds and high income males.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/30/push-for-higher-super-contributions-using-women-as-stalking-horse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: a centenary of continuous struggle for women</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/08/cox-a-centenary-of-continuous-struggle-for-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/08/cox-a-centenary-of-continuous-struggle-for-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=208706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women still have a long way to go for equality and we need to get moving because there are serious issues that cannot be solved by economic modelling of independent self-interested masculinity equations. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/08/cox-a-centenary-of-continuous-struggle-for-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: major parties show their limits on women&#8217;s issues</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/04/cox-major-parties-show-their-limits-on-womens-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/04/cox-major-parties-show-their-limits-on-womens-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Electoral Lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=207836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems neither major party leader put a sufficient priority on the WEL NSW event to give them something new to announce.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/04/cox-major-parties-show-their-limits-on-womens-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NT intervention &#8230; why it just didn&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/02/nt-intervention-why-it-just-didnt-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/02/nt-intervention-why-it-just-didnt-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Springs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Income Management Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=207243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The intervention has failed because of what was done and the way it was done, and it did not consult or engage with local people or, in many cases, address their problems.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/02/nt-intervention-why-it-just-didnt-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever happened to evidence-based policy making?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/10/whatever-happened-to-evidence-based-policy-making/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/10/whatever-happened-to-evidence-based-policy-making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alp government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goverment policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Income Management Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Territory intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=202192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government is adding another serious question to its social and financial policy competence by informing the public that it is proceeding with the promised evaluation of the New Income Management Program. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/10/whatever-happened-to-evidence-based-policy-making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: it&#8217;s possible to make every post (office) a winner</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/01/24/cox-its-possible-to-make-every-post-office-a-winner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/01/24/cox-its-possible-to-make-every-post-office-a-winner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=198610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australia Post decision-making process for closing offices is primarily commercial so I am suggesting an option for reform. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/01/24/cox-its-possible-to-make-every-post-office-a-winner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1496/1754 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 22:36:52 -->
