tip off

The 2011 Crikeys: who went boom and bust in business

After another year of remarkable volatility caused by the unpredictable news flow coming out of the European debt crisis, Australian investors have every reason to be sitting on their hands.

Is it any wonder total deposits have soared by almost $200 billion over the past four years as investors and consumers pay down debt, avoid risks and save like they haven’t since Gough Whitlam was in power? Despite constantly being told we’ve got the best performing economy in the developed world, many companies and investors aren’t enjoying the benefits.

The mining investment pipeline may have hit $600 billion, but the vast majority of this is foreign-owned and unless you are a Rio Tinto train driver earning $250,000, times are pretty tough.

Throw in the high Australian dollar, ongoing under-investment in infrastructure and rising union claims and it is hard to find many businesses that are going gangbusters besides those digging up dirt or abusing their market power in the locally-focused services sector.

So who did capitalise, and who lost out? The envelope please …

Best ASX performers of the year

The fastest way to destroy value is overpaying in takeovers, so it is always good to be a shareholder in the company being acquired. Foster’s shareholders this week collected a cool $10 billion from SAB Miller, which was way over the odds. And they have still got Treasury Wines which is worth $2.5 billion. The same goes for Axa Asia Pacific Holdings where minorities exited in March with a tidy $14 billion.

Since then both AMP and AXA’s French parent have seen their shares dive. In business, you’ve got to know when to hold ‘em, and known when to fold ‘em. Shareholders in Foster’s and Axa Asia Pacific Holdings should be thanking their boards for extracting lucrative exits.

Worst ASX performers of the year

Who would have ever thought the once mighty BHP Steel would be reduced to a demerged rump doing emergency capital raisings at 40c after losing $1 billion and getting flogged for overpaying its underperforming executives? While Bluescope Steel was hit by a perfect storm of soaring coal and iron prices, falling local demand and the high dollar, the simple lesson for investors was to avoid Bluescope — a stock which traded above $8 in 2007.

The same goes for surf and street wear darling Billabong, which traded above $16 in 2007 but is now back below $2 after this week’s latest shock profit warning. Once again, the high dollar and slowing retail sales were to blame.

Best-performing CEO of the year

Despite all his long lunches and crazy outbursts, Seven has never dominated the television ratings quite like 2011 — and David Leckie is the man who made it happen. After the merger of Seven with WA News, Leckie over-delivered on the promised profit for 2011-12 and it was the high-performing television business which did most of the heavy lifting.

The great survivor also fended off a messy court battle over James Warburton’s defection to Ten and has now anointed Tim Worner to run the television business. After almost 20 years at the top of Australian television, Leckie deserves to go out on a high with plenty of accolades.

Worst-performing CEO of the year

Lachlan Murdoch somehow managed to annoy everyone while getting overpaid to take an axe to Ten’s news and sports business. The hiring of James Warburton upset both Kerry Stokes and James Packer, and if Ten was really in such a mess you have to wonder why Lachlan paid $1.43 a share late last year to take a 9% parcel.

The stock is now wallowing at 88c after a woeful year. The handover to Warburton on January can’t come soon enough and then Lachlan can go back to comforting his father through the phone-hacking crisis and serving as the only non-executive director of News Corporation from the Murdoch family.

Gutsiest corporate move

Cameron Clyne and the NAB break-up campaign deservedly won plaudits for creativity and audacity. It was also a good corporate move which won truckloads of market share while reducing the risk of thoroughly deserved regulatory and political intervention. After all, Australians continue to suffer the world’s most expensive banking system — to keep the music going, cartel members need to be innovative. The Big Four made a record $32 billion before tax this year, so it pays to invest in some distracting PR.

Greatest acts of corporate bastardary

Unlike NAB, the Coles/Woolworths grocery duopoly appears to have no sense of proportion when it comes to risking regulatory intervention and staying on good terms with their suppliers. Even giants like Coke, Heinz, Goodman Fielder and Foster’s were put on the rack this year and completely done over on supplier terms.

Having the fattest margins of any grocery retailer in the world is clearly not good enough for Woolies, which now has a competitor run by a bunch of overpaid Poms who are trying to be even tougher. The result is supplier red ink all over the place and widespread destruction of brand equity as the duopoly aggressively role out their home brand strategy. New ACCC boss Rod Sims, suppliers and politicians are now mobilising and Bob Katter has even started a political party dedicated to breaking up the world’s most dominant grocery duopoly. When it happens, this friendless duo will have no-one to blame but themselves.

Lazarus award for corporate comeback

In March this year, Mark McInnes was rescued from purgatory by Solomon Lew after his ignominious 2010 departure from David Jones admitting to conduct of “a manner unbecoming of the high standard expected of a chief executive officer to a female staff member.” The hiring of McInnes as CEO of Premier Investment was a move that only an all-blokes board could do, but at least Solly has recently added a first-ever female director, Sally Herman. While McInnes appears to be behaving himself around female staff, he shows no restraint when it comes to lashing Paul Zahra, his successor at David Jones. He’s extremely lucky to have a top ASX job at all, let alone a licence to critique the performance of others.

CEO most deserving of the sack

After 58 years in the job, appalling governance, a trashed reputation and nearly two decades of share price under-performance, surely it is time for the independent News Corp directors to show Rupert Murdoch the door. After all, he’s turning 81 in March and the phone hacking scandal has revealed his “see no evil, hear no evil” approach to corporate ethics.

Alas, the completely undemocratic News Corp share voting structure allows Rupert to hand-pick loyal and compliant directors who seem completely unable or unwilling to move on a bloke whose family only owns 13% of the company.

14
  • 1
    Steven McKiernan
    Posted Thursday, 22 December 2011 at 2:18 pm | Permalink

    duopoly aggressively role out their home brand strategy” presumably with twenty sided dice

  • 2
    Mike Flanagan
    Posted Thursday, 22 December 2011 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    I think James deserve a mention in final year despatches Stephen.
    He has been left like a shag on an exposed rock by his old man. He has
    successfully implicated himself in possibly the most destardly expose of the press we have
    seen in the past fifty years of the media.
    Combined, the male progeny of Keith and Rupert Murdoch have used their
    empire to distort and lie about economics, science,social policy and
    politics throughout the English speaking world.
    They have overseen the greatest debasement of the profession of
    journalism in Austalian history. And that includes such venerable
    old ducks like “Smith’s Weekly” and “The Argus”.
    The Mrdochs have destroyed much of Fleet St credability and it is
    Rupert Murdoch’s Fox that gives us the maelstrom that is todays
    American polity.
    I worry about what awaites the Indians and Chinese when this media
    mafioso family get their unscupulous and unlawful ethics entrenched.
    in their media .

  • 3
    Frank Campbell
    Posted Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 6:02 pm | Permalink

    And who wins the award for Foie-gras Goose of the Year?

    Stephen Mayne, for swallowing Gunns’ propaganda in two hours of force-feeding.

    Regurgitated next day on Crikey….

  • 4
    Suzanne Blake
    Posted Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    Lets hope the new ACCC head takes on Woolworths and Coles, cause the previous head was weak and incompetent at stopping Woolworths and Coles.

  • 5
    Bobalot
    Posted Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    Lets hope the new ACCC head takes on Woolworths and Coles, cause the previous head was weak and incompetent at stopping Woolworths and Coles.

    While I agree that the duopoly needs to be broken, I don’t think it is fair to blame the old head of the ACCC. It is very difficult to prove that actual collusion or monopolistic practices are taking place. No doubt, Woolworths and Coles have expensive lawyers to double check that every strategic move they make is within the boundaries of the law.

  • 6
    Suzanne Blake
    Posted Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    @ Bobalot

    Thats wrong, Woolworths and Coles were called to account when their shopping centre leases prevented a competitor in the same centre. They lawyers would have looked at that?

    I happen to have some information from people that know at those retailers, who tell me that their strategy is to lower prices, drive out as much smaller players as possible and then raise prices together. They tried to buy the third biggest chain (not buying group) and a fierce bidding war started. The owner, who still owns the chain refused to accept their offers. In one case Woolworths punched a hole in one of their supermarket walls to allow customers direct entry from the Woolworths store into one of his stores to woo him. This happened in a shopping centre owned by a former Woolworth CEO, who was CEO at the time it happened.

    The trading terms that Woolworths and Coles force on suppliers is the most favourable in the World. They demand between 38% - 55% gross margins and then 15-20% rebates and allowances on top, the manufacturer funds specials 100% and then Woolworths and Coles claim settlement / payment discount if the suppliers wants to be paid in 45 days as apposed to the regular 72 days. There are some exceptions, ie bread, where the supplier is paid in 7 days.

  • 7
    sickofitall
    Posted Friday, 30 December 2011 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Hi Suzanne: I’d like some more information, but I suspect you can’t give it to me - I don’t want you sued…

  • 8
    Suzanne Blake
    Posted Friday, 30 December 2011 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    @ Sickofitall

    More information. It was a liquor chain.

    On the shopping centre lease issue, that was well reported in the media several years ago

    On the trading terms: ask any supplier. The Fairfax media has been running features on the trading terms in the last 3 months.

    Nothing to sue, its public domain, in any case I am under no confidentiality agreement.

  • 9
    sickofitall
    Posted Friday, 30 December 2011 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    Suzanne thanks. Will chase up

  • 10
    Suzanne Blake
    Posted Friday, 30 December 2011 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    @ sickofitall.

    chase up with who?

  • 11
    Peter Ormonde
    Posted Saturday, 31 December 2011 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    Suzanne…

    I don’t know what’s happening down there on the NSW Central Coast… one minute you’re campaigning for the release of a masked druggie in Bali next minute you’re getting all frothing bolshevik about grocers.

    I thought you liked capitalism. This is what it gets you… monopolies, oligopolies, concentration of power, cross subsidisation, market rigging … it’s the history of the thing. They are just better at it according to your lot.

    And now we have you bleeding hearts running off to the nanny state demanding inquiries and new red tape and inspectors - with silly uniforms and clipboards… all to restrict Coles and Woolies from behaving like robber barons. Oh you capitalist lackeys are fickle things.

    I would have thought you’d have little shrines to Coles and Woolworths in the lounge room and pray regularly as a family. Oh yes we already do …. thanks Channels 9, 7 and 10.

    See you at the next Occupy Wyong protest, Sooz.

  • 12
    Lord Barry Bonkton
    Posted Saturday, 31 December 2011 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    S.B , stop slagging off at my Wesfarmers ( coles ) company , they are making money for me. If you don’t like them , start your own company and take us on ? More red (Commie ) tape from you Nannies whingers. Market knows best ?

  • 13
    Suzanne Blake
    Posted Sunday, 1 January 2012 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    @ Peter Ormonde

    The 14 year old boy should not have been locked up, he was setup and has such a small amount. They ignore / support the people smugglers, yet lock up someone who was stupid / naive and setup.

    The grocers have exploited capitalism, there are bounds.

    I don’t intend on going to any political protect meetings, don’t need to the electorate is eyes wide open on the lot in Canberra and our local member, who has gone into hiding since the news hit. Great Labor local representation.

  • 14
    Peter Ormonde
    Posted Sunday, 1 January 2012 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    Happy New Sooz…

    Although how I ask you can anyone be even remotely content under the iron stiletto heel of the Red Queen and her Green protectors/protestors.

    Couple of minor issues: How old do you think the kids we are locking up in our adult prisons for crewing boats full of asylum seekers? Unlike your little “victim” in the mask - a good number of them didn’t even know they were doing anything out of the ordinary - let alone supposedly illegal. Talk about getting set up!

    Still we gotta send those messages to people smugglers yes - and smash their business model of course. And these kids just get snagged up in our semaphore.

    How about a festive seasonal outbreak of peace, charity and hope around the place. That would stop the boats.

    Now as to the meat and spuds of your recent denunciation of Coles and Woolies for “exploiting capitalism”…. What else should one do with it Suzanne???

    Since when has being successful a crime? The whole idea is competition innit? To compete and to win. And there was a competition - remember the corner store - and these guys have won. And now you and your nanny-stately, bleeding-heartedly, fiscally- failed entrepreneurs want to drag them down to the level of your feeble and coddled corner shops? I find myself coming over all hot and sweaty like Andrew Bolt in full fury flagrante.

    Pleading for hooded masked druggies, now attacking the very notion of free enterprise…. Next you’ll be telling us that Tony Abbot will take off the gloves with the grocery sector and restore the rule of Adam Smith! Just after he legalises the conduct of masked teen druggies who get set up in foreign swarthy countries.

    Foil Sooz. More foil and this time cover the ears.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...