Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

Media

Feb 24, 2016

Is the Tele right? Are dole bludgers really living it up on Bondi Beach?

How easy is it to mooch off the taxpayer and spend all day, every day lounging about on a world-class beach? Crikey intern Zara McDonald investigates.

Share

bondibeach

Yesterday, The Daily Telegraph today published an article entitled “Turn back the bludgers”, claiming dole bludgers were ripping the taxpayer off because they would prefer to play golf than work hard.

The Daily Telegraph went to Bondi Beach looking for bludgers, and saw plenty of candidates lying in the sun on the taxpayer’s dollar,” the article stated.

Of course, everyone who goes to Bondi Beach mid-week is on the Disability Support Pension (DSP) or on Newstart. Right?

But the paper wasn’t able to check with beach-goers if they all were surviving on government payouts, because “not surprisingly they weren’t too keen to talk to us, or have their ­picture taken”.

The Tele needn’t worry, because we dug a little deeper and crunched the numbers to come up with an answer we hope will satisfy all concerned parties.

Is it within the realm of possibility that “dole bludgers” can survive solely on government welfare while not working at all and living in Bondi Beach or surrounding areas?

For those who are independent and between the ages of 18 and 20 years old, the DSP provides $556.70 a fortnight. For a single adult with no children, the Newstart Allowance is set at $489.70 per fortnight

If you do the maths, that is just $278.35 a week for the DSP and $244.85 for Newstart.

Assuming you’d like to live in Bondi, the cheapest rent we can find online at the moment is $185 in a share house.

According to ASIC’s Money Smart, the average individual Australian under the age of 35 spends $104 a week on food and drink and $23 on clothing and footwear. But that’s the average, and we may reasonably assume those on government welfare are living below that standard. We played around with costs at Woolworths online and worked out that for just under $65 for a week, you could comfortably live off a diet of pasta, soup, sandwiches and cereal.

On top of this, public transport costs for a week sit around $17.50 for pensioners and are capped at $2.50 a day on the Opal Card. Those receiving the maximum rate of Newstart are eligible for the concession Opal card, which is capped at $7.50 a day. Assuming they’re travelling every day, that’s a maximum weekly cost of $52.50 just on transport.

In this sense, it’s probably not cost-effective for an adult on Newstart to take public transport. According to Can Star Blue, drivers in NSW spend, on average, $36.50 on driving a car every week.

So how are we faring so far?

For those on DSP, we’ve got $185 worth of rent, $65 for food and $17.50 on transport. For those on Newstart, we’ve got $185 on rent, $65 on food and $36.50 on transport.

Doing the maths, for those on the DSP, we’re spending about $267.50 a week, which leaves you a generous $10.85 to spend on luxuries like electricity and water. And for those on Newstart? We are coming in at $286.50, a whopping $41.65 a week to buy themselves something nice, like maybe medication or car rego.

But maybe these beach-going, dole bludgers do only that. Go to the beach every day and nowhere else, and therefore transport to any other destination in Sydney is irrelevant because they can just walk. Does that help our budget standings?

Well, for those on DSP, we save an extra $17.50 a week, coming in under budget by $28.35. For those on Newstart, even by walking everywhere and using no form of transport, we save the $36.50 on car expenses but still come in over budget by $5.15.

Maybe for those relying on government welfare, Bondi isn’t the smartest place to live. Sure, walking distance to the beach they frequent all day, every day, is great. But it’s unsustainable.

The cheapest rent elsewhere we can find is in a share house in Beecroft, Sydney where rent is just $100 for a week.

Add that to our existing expense of food ($65 weekly) and our spending is sitting at a comfortable $165 a week. That’s $113.35 under budget on the DSP and $79.85 for those on Newstart.

But now they can’t just walk to the beach they love so much. Let’s get our transport costs back in there. Add the $17.50 a week for DSP and their public transport, and $36.50 for Newstart and their car expenses and we’re still coming in under budget by $95.50 and $43.35 respectively.

So it’s possible — right?

Well, that’s assuming cars never need to be serviced, bills never need to be paid, wi-fi doesn’t need to be used or, you know, some don’t need a haircut from time to time or need to make a phone call.

Of course, all of these are rough estimates. But from whatever angle you look at it, it looks like a stretch for those relying on government welfare payments to live comfortably just, as The Daily Telegraph would say, “dole bludging” at Bondi Beach.

And we didn’t even factor in buying a beach towel.

Get a free trial to post comments
More from Crikey Intern

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

13 comments

Leave a comment

13 thoughts on “Is the Tele right? Are dole bludgers really living it up on Bondi Beach?

  1. Norman Hanscombe

    Both the actual Charles Dickens and Charlie Chaplin understood there were deserving and undeserving poor, but they were both intelligent men. They also understood that although there might not be sufficient jobs for everyone who wants one, there are plenty of vacancies unfilled because people would rather be supported by taxpayers and or they want better jobs than they can do adequately and or they enjoy the lazy lifestyle etc.
    If only the faux progressives would get around to serious thinking, but that’s a bridge too far for them.

  2. Charlie Chaplin

    It’s like we’ve time warped back to Dickensian London with ideas of deserving and undeserving poor. And it seems much easier for people to believe in bludgers (undeserving poor) than acknowledge that there aren’t enough jobs for everybody and that this was a choice made by 30 odd years of government.

  3. Norman Hanscombe

    Steve777, I trust you’re aware that neither ANY of the Political Parties nor ANY of the major capitalist media entities, including Crikey, have done what you ask?

  4. Steve777

    The Right should just come out and say what they believe should happen: that unemployment benefits and disability pensions, probably also aged pensions, should be replaced by private charity, extended family networks and low-paid work, way below the current minimum wage.

    I don’t know where these sick, disabled, elderly and/or unlucky people earning $200 per week (or $100 or $50) will live – maybe in aparthied-style shanty towns on the edges of our cities, maybe in favelas in former national parks (which the Right also don’t believe in). That’s what used to happen, that’s what still happens in many countries. Leave them at the mercy of the rich and unscrupulous. Sure, that’ll work.

  5. Steve777

    Let’s go after the real bludgers – wealthy individuals who hide their income and assets from the tax man in complex trust and corporate structures and tax havens.

  6. Norman Hanscombe

    Aethelstan, I didn’t say they were alone, did I.

  7. Norman Hanscombe

    drsmithy, you really should try to recognise that in terms of assembling a logical argument, the two non-related assertions in your first sentence are worthless.
    As for referring to “the best of (your) knowledge” in light of tis Post we shouldn’t put much store in that should we.

  8. drsmithy

    The political right just can’t let go of original sin. They always go looking for widespread systemic welfare abuse.

    To the best of my knowledge they’ve never found it.

    Try explaining to them that in a generation or two half of the population or more will be literally incapable of working because there’s nothing they can do a robot or computer can’t do better, and their eyes just sort of glaze over (possibly in no small part because of the other implications of this).

  9. Aethelstan

    Norman … the Telegraph and its journalists are definitely not alone … Hadley, Jones and Bolt are continually spitting out the same propaganda ….

  10. Norman Hanscombe

    Sadly anonymous Aethelstan you demonstrate that when it comes to the “blind prejudice and hate” you mention they’re certainly not alone, are they.

  11. Aethelstan

    The extreme fringe right Telegraph is often running these hysterical stories on bludgers ‘living it up’ but they are very short on facts and very high on blind prejudice and hate …

  12. klewso

    How do you ascertain a “bludger candidate”?
    “Research”?
    Tattoo?
    Undertake a Limited News course and lobotomy?

  13. Norman Hanscombe

    It’s absurd to claim dole bludgers [and other assorted spongers] are “living it up on Bondi Beach” when clearly they’re doing so in a far wider and larger spread of havens all over this and other Continents.

Leave a comment