tip off

Chris Kenny, barista? How The Australian can become profitable

A business that’s losing money should cut costs, cut wages, make hard choices and let the market decide, right? Let’s see The Australian practise what it preaches, writes a senior economics commentator.

The Australian newspaper, including its online version, is vocal when it comes to the economic debate about labour market flexibility, the need to end penalty wage payments, boosting productivity and skills development.  It is a champion of market forces and limitless flexibility for employees so that firms can remain profitable and can continue to hire workers and keep the overall unemployment rate down.

It is with this in mind that a recent case study popped into the news.

A business is losing money, and lots of it. This is because of competition and technology at one level, but also because it seems to have a high wage base. The average wage per employee is, staggeringly, two-and-a-half times the national average. The firm only keeps going because of a huge cross-subsidy from the profitable arms of the overall company.

The brand is valuable — a 50-year-old icon in its field, which means it just might be possible to turn it around if some tough decisions are taken by management in terms of its staff and productivity efforts.

No, the firm in not the Australian car industry. No, not the building industry. No, sorry, not Qantas or the suburban cafe, allegedly struggling with exorbitant penalty rates for workers on a Sunday morning when diners pop in for a $21 big breakfast, which includes eggs of your choice, bacon, sausage, a hash brown, baked beans, mushroom and sourdough toast.

It is The Australian.

If I were to ask the opinion of writers and journalists of The Australian how management should react to the challenge it is confronting, I am sure the answers would revolve around lowering costs, greater productivity, wage cuts and getting rid of all the cross-subsidies to let the business sink or swim.

The end game, of course, is that The Australian is not practising what it preaches. Writers don’t seem to write all that much, so the cost per square centimetre of copy (productivity, in other words) is dismally low.”

The likes of The Australian’s Judith Sloan, Henry Ergas, Chris Kenny and Adam Creighton have been writing about how labour market flexibility, in its optimal form, should result in wages cut when firms are doing it tough and losing money. They advocate that in addition to a pay cut, workers should become more productive — that is, doing more for a given level of pay. These gurus of free-market labour markets would, when aiming to boost productivity, suggest an extra column per week from the insightful Christian Kerr or yet another two made-up exclusives each day from Hedley Thomas or another look at the Rudd/Gillard tensions from Troy Bramston. Maybe for Troy, they can print the same column every other Tuesday, just above the fee-free ad for the Car and Gadgets column in The Weekend Australian.

Wow!  How many pages could be filled each day if this came to pass?

It is more for less. This is a model to return the once great newspaper to profitability.

The fact that this loss machine at The Australian pays an average yearly salary of $178,000 is fantastic. There is so much fat that can be cut. It is not like the paper has been run as a lean, mean machine where savings options are exhausted, or that there has been an effort to boost productivity in the past.

A reduction in the average salary to, say, one-and-a-half times the average weekly earnings (still well over $100,000 a year) would be a great step, no, a necessary step, to allow this once great newspaper to become profitable.

If, however, The Australian fails to implement what is preaches to every other economic manager and policymaker and the business does go bust, it will be a sad day. It is always a tragedy when jobs are lost.

When jobs are lost in the real world, The Australian triumphs a need for employee flexibility. Take a job in a different city, pick fruit, whatever comes along — and don’t be a job snob!

If the worst happens and everyone at The Australian were to lose their jobs, the current writers could try their hand in the high-wage, high-labour-cost food and catering industry. Sloan, Ergas, Creighton and Kenny have all bemoaned, at one time or another, the crippling nature of weekend penalty rates in the food sector and how cafes and restaurants have to shut on Sundays because of these wages and employment conditions.

Well, if conditions are so wonderfully good in a cafe, we can look forward to stumping up to the funky local breakfast place one Sunday morning and see Henry Ergas raking in an excessive salary as he makes eggs florentine. Of course, Chris Kenny would be thrilled to be a barista making a carbon-free decaf soy latte while Judith Sloan beavers away on the home-made baked beans, poached eggs and cous cous infused with a hint of Atlantic salmon. Adam Creighton would be on the juicing machine — trying to get the market to determine the right mix of raspberries, strawberries and blueberries in the ideal smoothie.

The end game, of course, is that The Australian is not practising what it preaches. It is bleeding money, and the wage rates appear ridiculous. Writers don’t seem to write all that much, so the cost per square centimetre of copy (productivity, in other words) is dismally low.

The Australian needs to turn things around turn. If it is to follow its mantra to government and other industries, it must deliver massive cuts to the wages of its staff, getting them to write more.

It needs to show flexibility so Henry Ergas could be the culinary writer and Adam Creighton can prepare the crosswords and Judith Sloan on cartoons. Dennis Shanahan could have a satirical column on the Newspoll results each fortnight.

To the team at The Australian  — you know what to do. It makes sense, so go to it. Flexibility, flexibility, flexibility.

26
  • 1
    rhwombat
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Ah News Corpse: It’s a bit like Slim Pickens riding the bomb at the end of Strangelove.

  • 2
    Lachlan Duncan
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps The Australian should be monitoring toilet breaks more closely (aka call center work)? Exactly how much time per day do Chris and Judith waste on toilet breaks? I’m sure they would see this sort of monitoring as a positive step in increasing the companies’ efficiency.

  • 3
    klewso
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    Don’t be silly - rules applied by Murdoch don’t apply TO Murdoch.

  • 4
    jmendelssohn
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    There is of course a problem with the idea that Chris Kenny could retrain as a barista. People value their coffee, and if he made the caffeine equivalent of the tosh the Australian is currently publishing then he would be out on his ear. Unlike News Ltd, the average high quality cafe does not value slops.

  • 5
    morebento
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Clearly the Oz is only kept going because of its use as a power leveraging tool by Murdoch. Would Murdoch’s successors be as interested in running the Oz or will there be a Packer style situation where other business areas are more lucrative?

  • 6
    Bo Gainsbourg
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    I think multi tasking is the answer. Let’s up the productivity rate of the individual employee there. Plus it would have the added bonus of sacking, sorry Liberating, some lower paid employees. And Henry E doesn’t seem to write that much, he could surely do some toilet cleaning to save the company as well. Yes its an outstanding opportunity for the Janet’s and co to show the world how a personally savage wage cut its what’s needed to save the “business”.

  • 7
    paddy
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Ah Crikey, the schadenfreude is sweet and deep on this one.
    Gold!

  • 8
    fractious
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    This is because of competition and technology at one level, but also because it seems to have a high wage base

    Agreed, but these are not the only problems this business has. One significant one not addressed is that, like car manufacturers a decade ago or the British motorcycle industry 40 years ago, it produces an outdated product that fewer and fewer want. Yes, drastically reducing wages may help, but there’s no point churning out more when the product itself is a wheezing, unreliable, over-priced thing that won’t steer straight, takes up far too much space and has an enormous blind spot. The only thing it’s economical with is the truth.

    The more discerning parts of the market have abandoned these old dinosaurs and are adopting the newer, nippier and much less toxic local and imported products; while some of these new makes might not have the cache this brand does, at least you don’t have to disable your critical faculties to use them.

  • 9
    Brian Williams
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    I can only assume that your anonymous writer lives in Sydney, because the aforementioned big breakfast can be easily obtained for $16.95 in the trendy cafes of SE Melbourne on any given sunday, and their freshly squeezed OJ is superb.

  • 10
    Irfan Yusuf
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    It’s so much fun watching free market fanatics not practise what they preach.

  • 11
    zut alors
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    While it’s feeding an old man’s ego & while he can still afford that luxury the fatted Oz is safe.

  • 12
    The Pedanticist
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    If they need somewhere to start they could go for my new pet hate at the Oz - Adam Creighton. What a horrible, vile and ignorant young thing he is… If you want to know why, iView his performance on last Wednesday night’s Drum…. *shudder*

  • 13
    The Pav
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    Re The Australian Wage rates….A real business does not pay over the odds to lose money which is evidence that The Oz is not a real paper anymore but an intentional propganda sheet to give Murdoch undue influence to promote his other business interests.

    The other thing the pay rates show is just how much it costs for journalists to sacrifice their ethics

  • 14
    Graeme
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    Fair fares.

    Paying talented journalists (and the Oz has some) a high wage, with good support staff, is something crikey.com might be jealous of, but applaud.

    Surely, however, the Oz doesn’t guarantee those opinionistas $3500pw (plus holidays etc) to regurgitate a few columns of tired ideology? There’s an easy market of talented free-lance writers, willing to work for a going rate of about $500 for an opinion piece.

  • 15
    DiddyWrote
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Would it be wise to let Kenny handle food and beverages. The chances of patrons catching distemper would be very high.

  • 16
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    Yes - all those op-ed writers. They endlessly preach in their columns that high wages hinder employment growth and also cause businesses to fail. They should practise what they preach and demand lower wages to “save” Rupert Murdoch’s business from going under!

  • 17
    Neutral
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    The embroided running battles between Mark Latham and Chris Kenny/assorted tea party string jigglers is worth a subscription to the weekend versions of The Australian and the AFR. Oh? … well there’s always The Biggest Loser…

  • 18
    rhwombat
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    Bravo DW & EL!

  • 19
    Northy
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Oooh, I’d be careful photoshopping Chris Kenny!

  • 20
    Bill Hilliger
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    The Australian must follow its own mantra to government and other industries: deliver massive pay cuts to staff. Clearly obvious, they just get paid too much for their limited talent and they must write more even if its the truth than their usual BS. Additionally publish more smut; tits on page three; it might work and will not degrade the paper’s quality from what it already is.

  • 21
    Kevin Herbert
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 5:56 pm | Permalink

    If his news analysis is any guide, clearly C D F Kenny lacks the judgement to become a successful barista.

  • 22
    Electric Lardyland
    Posted Friday, 22 August 2014 at 7:25 pm | Permalink

    And bravo to you rh, for the excellent Dr Strangelove analogy.
    Of course, a cafe conversation that I’d love to overhear in the future: “So Chris, who do you fancy in race five at Dapto?”

  • 23
    Liamj
    Posted Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 9:07 pm | Permalink

    Optimising staff numbers at The UStralian has to be done without compromising its core functions.

    Half a dozen expenses accountants will keep the LibNat back-benchers frightened into line, & squawk-radio can afford their own churnalists to stick local names on Tea Party talking points. As for general pollution of the public discourse, they could just buy a few thousand bots to retweet the many volunteer dyspeptics. Oh they did that already? Ok good, but theres still the toughest job of all: who’s going to suck the Murdochs toes?

  • 24
    Alex
    Posted Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Thank you, Ms/Mr Anonymous (and Ms/Mr Crikey, too). This article made me smile!

    I’m guessing you’ve chosen to remain anon, because of the retribution that News usually viciously dishes out to its critics.

    BTW, if you want to cite an even bigger example of News’ hypocrisy, take a look at their reporting standards (available on their websites). It’s almost as if they don’t know it exists, or their illiterate. Given the crap they write, I reckon it could be the latter. You will need to maintain the anonymity, though.

  • 25
    AR
    Posted Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    Is it overly suspicious of me to think that this might have been written by one of mudorc’s minions, disgusted at what he (sic!) has done with his talent & life?

  • 26
    Dez Paul
    Posted Monday, 25 August 2014 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    Great job, Anon.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...