Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter


Middle East

Aug 21, 2014

Promoting the grisly terrorism theatre of IS

The grisly murder of James Foley is the continuation of a well-established Islamic extremist tradition of media manipulation. And it works.

User login status :


I say to you: that we are in a battle, and that more than half of this battle is taking place in the battlefield of the media. — Ayman al-Zawahiri, 2005

If it bleeds, it leads. — Informal media industry rule

Beheading videos are hardly new. In fact, al-Qaeda once produced so many of the grisly propaganda artifacts in the 2000s that it realised they were losing their media potency, and curtailed them. What was once regarded as a new low of horrific barbarity became run-of-the-mill media fodder.

Now with the murder of James Foley, they’ve been revived by Islamic State militants, a group that has already proved highly adept at using social media to both terrorise their opponents within Iraq and stoke Western outrage. And they know exactly what buttons to push in the Western media to maximise their coverage. Some of their propaganda looks to be photoshopped, but the murder of Foley is ostentatious savagery, a grisly kind of terrorism theatre designed to enrage. The fact that a British executioner was used is hardly accidental either.

As Fairfax’s Tom Allard explains in an excellent analysis today, the broader IS goal with the video is to build up pressure on Western governments to take stronger military action in Syria and Iraq. It’s plainly working, as angry media commentators and politicians demand action. GOP veteran John McCain — who admittedly never met a war he didn’t like — called the beheading a “turning point”, saying “you’ve got to dramatically increase the airstrikes”. “Destroy the Islamic State,” demanded the UK Telegraph’s defence editor. The local Telegraph — which ran a column by Andrew Bolt channelling Margaret Thatcher’s advice about terrorism, demanding that the government “cut off Clive Palmer’s oxygen”, while putting the Foley murder on its front page — declared it an evil that “must not be allowed to stand”.

In that context, the outrage directed at News Corp tabloids here and elsewhere giving the moment of Foley’s death front-page treatment is misplaced; any publicity for the murder, whether there’s a blade showing or not, does the work of IS.

“The obsessive preoccupation with terrorism is a bizarre case of prioritising a threat that harms far fewer of us than car crashes, crime or easily preventable diseases.”

Whether the militants will be around long enough to reap the rewards of their strategy isn’t clear: they are suffering significant reversals because of US air strikes and attacks by US-backed Kurdish forces. But experience tells us it’s a sound strategy. The Iraq War played out exactly in line with Osama bin Laden’s original goal behind 9/11 — to induce a furious United States to militarily intervene in Muslim countries and thereby anger and radicalise extremists on a mass scale. The US, and docile allies like the UK and Australia, spent $2 trillion creating a whole new generation of terrorists, and IS wants us to repeat the dose. IS and Western neoconservatives (and the military and contracting industries that back them) are thus locked into an unspoken but very real alliance of interests — each needs the other to perpetuate the War on Terror.

The beheading front page also illustrates how race and terrorism work to prevent us, or at least the media that purports to serve us, from thinking rationally. It’s to state a commonplace to note that a white, English-speaking individual’s death carries more weight than that of a non-white, non-Anglophone individual for the media; 2000 Gazans, the bulk of them civilians, can be blown apart by the Israeli military without many in the media seeing anything newsworthy, let alone disturbing; another Islamic extremist group of notable brutality, Boko Haram, has killed over 2000 Nigerians in 2014 but only gets Western attention when a Twitter hashtag goes viral.

What IS has done, however, is skilfully play to Western fears in a way that Boko Haram could never do no matter how many Nigerian schoolchildren it abducted or slaughtered: the white, English-speaking Westerner — and a member of the media — far from home, fallen into the wrong hands, horrifically murdered, with the unsubtle suggestion that the individuals who did it or those who share their views could be on your streets in London, or Sydney, or Chicago. It was “better to fight them in Iraq than here” was one of the neocon justifications for the Iraq War, an updating of the Vietnam-era line that it was was better to fight them in the jungles of Asia than in Pasadena (to which Michael Herr said he felt like replying, “at least we might win if it was in Pasadena”); IS and its vile terrorism theatre seeks to goad us into the same self-defeating argument.

Meanwhile, as always, far greater threats to the lives of Westerners, things that kill far more Australians and Americans and Brits than will ever be killed, no matter how horrifically, by terrorists, are ignored. It takes a particularly dramatic case of domestic violence to even get media coverage, let alone a front page, despite the dozens of women and children killed each year by partners and parents in Australia. The point is not to equate terrorism and intimate partner violence, but to note that for anyone focused entirely on the lives and health of Australians, the obsessive preoccupation with terrorism is a bizarre case of prioritising a threat that harms far fewer of us than car crashes, crime or easily preventable diseases.

Bernard Keane — Politics Editor

Bernard Keane

Politics Editor

Bernard Keane is Crikey’s political editor. Before that he was Crikey’s Canberra press gallery correspondent, covering politics, national security and economics.

Get a free trial to post comments
More from Bernard Keane


We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

15 thoughts on “Promoting the grisly terrorism theatre of IS

  1. GideonPolya

    Excellent article by Bernard Keane. It has been blindingly obvious to informed people – but not Westerners who actually believe the propaganda of their endlessly mendacious governments – that Muslim-origin non-state fighters wittingly or unwittingly serve the interests of US Alliance by regularly providing excuse for war (causus belli; “an act or event that provokes or is used to justify war”) . Indeed the US originally funded Al Qaeda and the Taliban and it has been asserted that the Israeli Shin Bet (Apartheid Israel’s internal security service) originally backed Hamas in order to divide the Palestinians, enable genocidal Israeli intransigence and for “terror hysteria” propaganda purposes in the West.

    Indeed for all the Zionist- and pro-Zionist-promoted Western “terror hysteria”, Muslim-origin non-state terrorists have killed only 2,000 Westerners in the last quarter century (this total excluding 2,000 racist Zionist invaders killed by Palestinians and 3,000 people killed in the 9-11 atrocity that clearly involved the US Government and very likely involved Israeli state terrorists; see “Experts: US did 9-11”: https://sites.google.com/site/expertsusdid911/ and “Racist Zionism and Israeli State Terrorism threats to Australia and Humanity” : https://sites.google.com/site/palestiniangenocide/racist-zionism-and-israeli ).

    While the “annual homicide rate per million of population” is about 2000 /(1,000 million x 25 years) = 0.08 per million per year for Western civilians being killed in the last quarter century by a “Muslim-origin non-state terrorist” (about the same as for deaths from shark attack in Australia) , this parameter is 4.6 million/25 million x 25 years = 7,360 per million per year for Iraqi deaths from US Alliance violence or US war-imposed deprivation over the last 25 years. US Alliance state terrorism indeed.

    Terrorism is as terrorism does. US state terrorism, UK state terrorism, French state terrorism, Israeli state terrorism and Australian state terrorism outdo “Muslim-origin non-state terrorism” against Western civilians in terms of body count over the last 25 years by a factor of 12 million/2,000 = 6,000.

    Australian state terrorism? Yes – Australia has participated in all post-1950 US Asian wars, conflicts associated with 40 million deaths from violence and violently-imposed deprivation (see (Gideon Polya, “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950”, that includes an avoidable mortality-related history of every country since Neolithic times and is now available for free perusal on the web: http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com.au/2012/01/body-count-global-avoidable-mortality_05.html ). White Australia has a major complicity in the generation of over 20 million Muslim refugees in the Zionist-backed US War on Muslims and 12 million Muslim deaths (half of children) from violence and violently-imposed deprivation since 1990 (see Muslim Holocaust Muslim Genocide”: https://sites.google.com/site/muslimholocaustmuslimgenocide/ ) and has confined thousands of children fleeing this ongoing atrocity in concentration camps.

    Peace is the only way but silence kills and silence is complicity. By endless lying and censoring, Mainstream media are complicit in the horrendous crimes of US state terrorism, UK state terrorism, French state terrorism, Israeli state terrorism and Australian state terrorism.

Leave a comment