tip off

Crikey says: still paying the price for Bush’s folly

Meet the real Tony — just like real Julia, with added ideology. A paranoid Oz turns on the Press Council. Attack of the bean-counters at Art Gallery of NSW. Conservatives go all civil disobedience on 18C. Poll Bludger on the social liberalisation of Australia. Banning stuff: the real answer to climate change. Jokowi’s murderous new right-hand man. Chris Kenny’s super high-tech echo chamber. And Bob Marley didn’t really shoot the sheriff, judge rules.

The decision of the Obama administration to intervene militarily in Iraq in defence of Yazidi refugees and what is, for all intents and purposes, the new independent Kurdish state against Islamic State forces is the correct one. But it also demonstrates the extent to which Iraq has been left as an unviable state in the wake of the attack on Saddam Hussein. The most powerful symbol of this was when US airstrikes destroyed the Humvees of Islamic State forces. These US-supplied vehicles were captured from fleeing Iraqi army forces in June.

All of this is the product of the vast historical tragedy of the Iraq War. It is a war that has so far cost nearly US$2 trillion and, according to American estimates, will eventually cost up to US$4 trillion by the time the last veteran of the conflict dies and the ongoing medical bill associated with treating veterans is finalised. That cost does not include the over 5000 allied lives lost in Iraq, nor the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives.

The only demonstrable result of the Iraq War is that the West was made less safe. That is the conclusion of British and American intelligence agencies and the Australian Federal Police: that the attack on Iraq made Western countries less safe from terrorism. Now governments are insisting once again that we are threatened by terrorism from Iraq, and that this threat justifies further draconian changes to our anti-terror laws.

The price we are paying for the folly of men like George W. Bush, Tony Blair and John Howard is now greater than ever.

6
  • 1
    Bill Hilliger
    Posted Monday, 11 August 2014 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    And now for war criminal charges for Bush Blair Howard the three warriors.

  • 2
    klewso
    Posted Monday, 11 August 2014 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    Bush had help - Howard, Blair and “Comical Ally” Murdoch, “embedded”, to handle PR.

  • 3
    Posted Monday, 11 August 2014 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Well, unlikely the *only* demonstrable result of the Iraq War… sure, the Sunnis are back… but I think this quote sums it up:

    See, this is why I keep thinking Cheney’s got to be an Iranian mole. How could he not see that a war in Iraq benefits noncombatant neighboring states? He had to know. He can’t be that stup — Wait, I withdraw the comment.” - The War Nerd

  • 4
    AR
    Posted Monday, 11 August 2014 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    The point surely, as WarNerd groked, is that they cannot have been so stupid therefore the only question is what were the real motives? It can’t have been oil as it turned out to be orders of magnitude dearer to steal it than buy it. Plus the concomitant damage on the societies of the belligerents, our loss of security, general freedoms and further encroachments to come.
    Looks as if that was the original purpose all along, the Security State unquestioned my Mr & Mrs Pooter who actually demand that they be protected from whatever hobgoblin the authorities post.

  • 5
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 12 August 2014 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    Bush’s folly”, “Howard legacy” - “monkeys in silk ….”?

  • 6
    Posted Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 7:32 am | Permalink

    Great editorial, thanx. I still wish they were signed.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...