Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

Crikey Says

Jul 29, 2014

Crikey says: danger for AFP in Ukraine, armed or unarmed

Abbott’s culture war hits the road. Is air travel getting less safe? Ben Sandilands looks at the odds of a crash. Julia and the party faithful at Combet book launch. The Business Council's new-found love of socialism. Palmer’s wrangling in Queensland could help Newman. The mystery of the lost dictaphone: ethical questions for journalists in Vic. Don’t mention the war at Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce. Lewski class action. And media is fukt: the view from NPR’s Bob Garfield.

User login status :

Share

A group of unarmed Australian police officers has entered a war zone to secure the crash site of MH17. The contingent, which is part of a joint Dutch-Australian mission, was forced to turn back from the site this morning due to fighting between pro-Russian rebels and Ukrainian troops, according to the ABC’s Stephen McDonell.

Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Julie Bishop is in Kiev, holding talks with the Ukraine President to allow the officers to carry guns. “Part of that is to have the right, should it ever be necessary, to bring arms into the country for self-defence,” Bishop said this morning, stressing that Australia’s presence in the country remained a “humanitarian mission”.

As in the aftermath of the 2002 Bali bombings, which killed 88 Australians, it is right that Australia provide expertise in the form of Australian Federal Police officers to assist with identifying the perpetrators of a violent act that killed dozens of Australians. But sending unarmed police officers into an active war zone is a reckless act that could lead to more Australian deaths. Going in with guns, even if they are used for self-defence, is arguably even more so.

Such neutral visitors, attending at the behest of their governments, may make tempting human shields or kidnap targets, particularly for irregular forces of the kind opposing the Ukrainian government, to say nothing of the possibility for further tragic accidents, which are all too common in war zones.

Get a free trial to post comments
More from Crikey

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

9 comments

Leave a comment

9 thoughts on “Crikey says: danger for AFP in Ukraine, armed or unarmed

  1. Iskandar

    Abbott is of course engaging in the compulsory grandstanding required of a PM when something awful like this happens, but Julie Bishop just keeps showing that she’s brain-dead. Sending armed personel into a war zone means they join in the war. Who will they shoot at in the course of defending themselves, the Kiev junta forces or the defenders of the DPR? And imagine the flak should some almost inevitably get killed.

    Bishop doesn’t seem to grasp that the crash site was secured by DPR forces, who already did much of the gruesome work of collecting the dead, putting them in refrigerated rail cars, and expediting their transport to Amsterdam. Malaysian authorities had the good sense to negotiate with DPR authorities for transfer of the black boxes, but our Julie works with the collapsing government of a failing state that not only does not control the crash site, but is ramping up military activities in the area, preventing investigators from going in. Really, the woman should resign from politics and open a hair-dressing shop in Claremont.

    David Hand, I agree there is a geopolitical struggle going on, but Mr Putin is not the instigator. He is taking careful necessary steps to defend his nation from the encroachment from the West of the US/NATO alliance who are following a long-standing script of “containing” Russia that dates back to 1945 at least by infiltrating and exploiting ethnic, cultural and political faultlines in countries along Russia’s borders. It’s Mr Putin’s restraint under extreme provocation that I find amazing. But overall, the pattern is very like the one that led to the Vietnam War. Let’s see if any lessons are remembered from that debacle.

Leave a comment