tip off

No, chef! Rise up against restaurant tyranny

When did the tables turn in fine dining? And how can you get a decent meal at a decent time with a decent number of courses without ingesting “fish milk”?

A few months ago, I organised with some friends to go to a successful Sydney restaurant. Like most of its ilk, it required a booking at either 6.30pm or 8.30pm — we chose the early time. As he sat down, one of my friends calmly signalled the waitress: “I’ll have a Negroni, thanks, and that 8.30 deadline? We won’t be leaving.”

I sat, stunned, waiting for the roof to fall in. This could get us thrown out — was he crazy? The waitress smiled sweetly — “That’s not a problem, sir” — and went off to get drinks. We had a lovely, leisurely meal during which I felt like Rosa Parks. We had taken on an unjust system and won.

I’m not sure when the balance of power in a Sydney restaurant swung from the paying customer to the chef, but it feels like it’s been that way forever. Once upon a time you booked a convenient time to eat, ordered from a menu, then paid your bill at the end. In Sydney, in what I can only assume are end times for fine dining, that seems as quaint as a game of croquet.

I recently searched the websites of several upmarket Sydney restaurants to book for a special occasion. For one of them, you emailed through a request and they told you when they could seat you. Almost all of them had degustation menus, which I think is a bit like eating at your mother’s — “eat what you are given and no complaining”. And one of them required a deposit of half the cost of the meal upon booking. I’m not sure what the consumer watchdog would say about being charged for a meal before you’ve eaten it, but it left a bad taste in my mouth.

I blame Ferran Adria and Noma’s Rene Redzepi, who took the French concept of degustation — a series of set, small courses — and injected it with steroids. Restaurants love set menus because it keeps food costs down, not that you’d know that from the bill — at the top end, food with matching wines is nudging $400 a head. Some Sydney eateries now serve up nine or 10 courses, which is an impossible amount of food — after the fourth course, it’s simply culinary torture. One of them suggests allowing two hours for 11 courses, which is one plate of food every 11 minutes; if you can eat that without feeling ill, your digestion is better than mine. The end result of this is the final scene of La Grande Bouffe, where the patrons literally explode.

And what if you don’t like something? Searching the online menus, I found tripe (disgusting), “chlorophyllic broccoli puree”, “goat tartare” (I’m assuming it’s raw) and, god help us, “fish milk”.

The final straw is that waitstaff have copied Noma and insist on describing each course at great length. This becomes really intrusive — if I’d wanted to spend all night interacting with the waiter, we’d be out on a date. And by the way, we can all read.

Restaurants, of course, are a low-margin business, and chefs are entitled to do all they can to stay afloat. And complaining about fine-dining eateries is obviously a first-world problem. But our tiny victory over the departure time has encouraged me to think that if you fight back, you can actually beat the system — Sydneysiders, stand your ground!

As usual, the French have got it right. In an interview with the Financial Times, famous Parisian chef Alain Passard was asked if the customer was always right.

“Yes, always. I am there to serve others’ commands, and I always do what I am asked to do. I put aside my own concerns when faced with a client who orders a dish cooked a certain way or asks for a certain seasoning.”

Bon appetit.

13
  • 1
    Paracleet
    Posted Friday, 25 July 2014 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Get off my lawn!

  • 2
    Lubo Gregor
    Posted Friday, 25 July 2014 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    Well said Margot. However, if I ever told my grandmother that I had spent $400 on a dinner, she would probably brake a broomstick on me :)

  • 3
    mikeb
    Posted Friday, 25 July 2014 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    Thankfully “pub” meals are 1000% better than they used to be, and still present food as food - not as a scientific experiment in content and description. That’s what gets my money these days.

  • 4
    Margot Saville
    Posted Friday, 25 July 2014 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

    mikeb, completely agree. Good food, decent wine and no-frills service. I like them too.

  • 5
    geoff kendall
    Posted Friday, 25 July 2014 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    Not to mention the arrogant waiter in some of these places who somehow thinks s/he is responsible for the entire meal and deserves to be praised for it

  • 6
    AR
    Posted Saturday, 26 July 2014 at 8:27 am | Permalink

    Mine heart breaketh not.

  • 7
    fractious
    Posted Saturday, 26 July 2014 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    Restaurants, of course, are a low-margin business, and chefs are entitled to do all they can to stay afloat.”

    Not *all* restaurants are on low margins, and IMO part of the problem you complain about is wholsesale acceptance of the second part of that sentence. No, chefs are *not* entitled to do anything it takes.

    I’m not having a go at you Margot - if you’ve got the cash to splash on $400 a head eateries, good luck to you. But you can solve the whole thing just by ignoring all the hype and the circuses by trying out just about any of the places in Cheap Eats, Time Out &c, most of which serve great food in (mostly) convivial places and have staff that treat you like a sentient being. The more punters stay away from these “successful” places (perhaps ‘high-profile’ is a better adjective) the faster their proprietors will realise they’re doing it wrong.

  • 8
    kriscolour
    Posted Saturday, 26 July 2014 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Wow, feeling like Rosa Parks for standing up to a snooty restaurant? Even in jest, that’s pretty poor taste. And much as I hate the expression “First World Problems” it would have to be invented for this North Shore whinge of an article if it didn’t already exist.

  • 9
    Mark Kennedy
    Posted Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    Gawd I can’t think of anything to add; except why do I have to read this at all?

  • 10
    Darcy E
    Posted Monday, 28 July 2014 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Goodness me, what a pompous rant. Your Negroni drinking friend sounds like an obnoxious thug.

  • 11
    Darcy E
    Posted Monday, 28 July 2014 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Also I’m not sure which cut of La Grande Bouffe you’ve seen, but I don’t remember anyone “literally” exploding.

  • 12
    cyberfysh
    Posted Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 12:31 am | Permalink

    Totally agree with Darcy E - arrogance is never attractive.

  • 13
    Itsarort
    Posted Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 6:55 am | Permalink

    I love tripe! However, I do prefer it with white sauce rather than having it served in written form…

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...