tip off

Crikey says: Muir and Palmer put democracy to the test

Abbott’s new Coalition of the Unwilling. Fairfax hits back at News trashing. Lawyers at 20 paces in Vic Parliament stoush. NSW shooters bring out big guns. Van Badham looking for lefty love? Canada’s mining bragging rights. Why bike shares are tanking. And a DFAT dinner spat?

To watch senator-elect Ricky Muir being interviewed by the Seven Network on Sunday night was to experience a rare moment of raw, unwatchable embarrassment as he struggled to answer even the simplest questions about the federal political arena he will enter in three weeks’ time.

Muir has no experience as a media performer, and no political background. He has entered the Senate by fluking his way in via a voting process that is best described as something between a lottery and a democratic rort. He is, moreover, in every way the antithesis of the polished, professional politicians we see every day, who speak constantly but rarely say anything of substance.

Muir, in contrast, had little to say but his performance spoke volumes — about his unpreparedness. This performance from a man who will shortly be one of the most important people in the country in terms of implementing the government’s legislative agenda was deeply concerning. Once in the Senate, the pressure on Muir will be far greater than that applied by a TV interviewer asking about common-or-garden political terminology.

There’s a segment of the electorate that traditionally likes anti-politicians, that prefers inarticulate authenticity over the bland on-message non-communication of professional politicians who have been working on their image since their time in student politics. We’re supposed to like the idea of ordinary people disrupting the ritualised and stultifying political games of Canberra. But with the responsibility of power comes an obligation to communicate how one intends to use it. And so far, it’s unclear what senator-elect Muir will do with his power other than implement the will of Clive Palmer.

7
  • 1
    AR
    Posted Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    I am looking forward to this unique situation and wish the man well.
    He could become a conduit for an authentic voice - he seems a nice enough person which is more than can be said of the rest on offer.

  • 2
    max steinman
    Posted Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    You could have at least quoted something he said.

  • 3
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Ever watched a feather in a breeze ….. or a puppet show?
    Clive Geppetto’s Pinocchio?

    I reckon he took it on as a laugh - like throwing around kangaroo poop - not expecting to win - now he’s has, he’s looking more like the kangaroo caught in headlights with his pants down?

    Remember Mal Meninga’s try?

  • 4
    Bill Hilliger
    Posted Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    …was to experience a rare moment of raw, unwatchable embarrassment as he struggled to answer even the simplest questions about the federal political arena. That’s what most coalition front benchers manage to do every day.

  • 5
    JMNO
    Posted Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 9:59 am | Permalink

    He may be a disaster but he may grow in the job. We just have to wait and see. I haven’t seen the interview but wouldn’t it have been kinder, more productive and less ‘gotcha’ to have asked him about himself and what he wants to achieve in parliament, rather than try to show him up as a fool?

  • 6
    klewso
    Posted Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Like Steve Fielding?
    Did Willesee set out to make him look a fool?

  • 7
    Rena Zurawel
    Posted Monday, 23 June 2014 at 7:30 pm | Permalink

    Who may be more embarassing than Tony Abbot?
    Is he really a polished politician????

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...