tip off

What we will lose if we destroy the public broadcaster

The ABC is under threat, with the cuts announced in the budget likely to be the tip of the iceberg. ABC journalist and public broadcasting advocate Quentin Dempster warns Coalition MPs to be careful what they wish for: a Murdoch monopoly won’t be all they hoped.

The ABC axe is about to fall.

First up: targeted redundancies within the 108 full-time and part-time staff employed to service the ABC’s now-terminated Australia Network contract. ABC managing director Mark Scott was handed a letter giving 90 days’ notice of the termination of the contract from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade on budget night, May 13.

The mindless destruction for the national interest, with no announced alternative from Foreign Minister Julie Bishop, has indicated to public broadcasters the ideological hostility to public broadcasting from within elements of the Australian Liberal Party.

Bishop gave an insight into her resentment of the ABC’s editorial independence in international broadcasting in a speech she delivered to Chatham House in London on March 4:

My question is whether or not there is an inherent conflict in having the ABC contracted to deliver Australian government messages into the region. We’ve had conflict writ large when it comes to the issue of asylum seekers and the issue of the Snowden allegations. The ABC is a news organisation and perfectly entitled to report how it wishes into the region on those two contentious issues. But under a soft-power diplomacy contract, it’s meant to be delivering a positive image of Australia into the region.”

The BBC has been a beacon in liberal democratic broadcasting, including coverage of highly contentious issues to its worldwide audiences. Audiences everywhere see political dissent within the United Kingdom confronting  and sometimes embarrassing UK authority. Rather than damaging UK foreign policy, it has been a resonating bonus for democratic ideals and separation-of-powers institutional strength within national borders.

That was the ABC’s ambition for international broadcasting in the region, particularly the developing democracy of Indonesia and engagement with China. The ABC is a vital link to the outside world for the peoples of the Pacific, and its English-language educational services are a hit.

With 3.3 billion mobile phone users in Asia, the ABC has the quality and ethical content to wire Australia into Asia as never before. Bishop has delivered a hammer blow to the momentum the taxpayer investment was building. She wants Australian government propaganda; such is the shallowness of her thinking.

Now the ABC board under chairman James Spigelman is having to determine the future of its international broadcasting, including the still-relevant Radio Australia, without the benefit of funds derived through the Australia Network contract.

The board is expected to make a commitment to press on, particularly with the re-broadcast partnerships built up over the last 10 years. But inevitably there will be downsizing, including targeted redundancy from among the 43 skilled production and reporting staff from the Asia-Pacific news centre in Melbourne.

The board is expected to re-shape the entire ABC in the coming weeks under cover of the cuts announced in the budget. Alleged “friend” Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has put the boot in to the ABC in recent speeches about “efficiency”, with the coercive lever that the 1% cut is but a “down payment”. Further targeted and voluntary redundancies of public broadcasters are coming with an expectation that Scott will seize the opportunity to further casualise and nationalise the ABC’s now declining 4600 full-time equivalent workforce. With more than half the ABC staff working in Sydney, the ABC is already Sydney-centric. While lip service will be paid to regionalism and localism, these structures are expensive and therefore dispensable in any reprioritised ABC to reflect Scott’s ambition that its future will be in concentrated digital services — text, audio and video.

And what of SBS? There’s still no chairman of this public broadcaster following the unceremonious  dumping of Joseph Skrzynski at the reported insistence of the Prime Minister in March. It is leaderless and also now faces a downsizing and reshaping. The failure of the Abbott government to find a chairman is further evidence of ideological hostility. An ABC-SBS merger would destroy SBS at a time when its multilingual services are needed more than ever. Removing the five-minutes-per-hour cap on SBS TV advertising will make SBS Australia’s fourth free-to-air fully commercial channel. Wonder what the board of Channel Ten thinks about that?

Memo to Liberal Party MPs: don’t fall for Murdoch press propaganda however much you think it helps you in the adversarial game of Australian politics. The ABC was created by the Lyons Coalition government in 1932, supported by one R. G. Menzies, then a Victorian MP. The ABC is part of the institutional strength and robustness of Australian democracy. Get into bed with Murdoch and you sell your souls.

12
  • 1
    Alastair Nicholson
    Posted Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    Great article shows how stupid the ant-ABC clique is

  • 2
    Steve777
    Posted Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    The Liberals have already sold their souls. The ABC and SBS won’t survive a second Abbott term, should he get one. As for a Government propaganda network, while the Liberals are in power Newscorp looks after that

  • 3
    Pedantic, Balwyn
    Posted Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    Ms Bishop demonstrates that the Right is only concerned with how it is perceived by the rest of the world. Their perception has nothing to do with truth or factual representation. Any hint of criticism draws a strong rebuke or where possible punitive measures to give example to any one or organisation that deviates from the Right’s viewpoint of the world. Hopefully the harsh, and inequitable policies measures proclaimed in the recent budget will open the general publics eyes to this appalling bunch of ideologues.

  • 4
    zut alors
    Posted Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    The Coalition forgets that Murdoch occasionally abandons them to give the ALP a shot at government.

    The Abbott government would be ill-advised & short-sighted (their standard modus operandi) to undermine independent media… for which the Coalition may be grateful again one day.

  • 5
    Alex
    Posted Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 5:56 pm | Permalink

    Well said, Quentin!!

  • 6
    Scott
    Posted Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 5:56 pm | Permalink

    The ABC was created by the Lyons Coalition government in 1932”

    It was actually nationalised in 1932 (ABC was called the Australian Broadcasting Company) before that.

    In 1932, you could argue that the Government needed a national broadcaster to promote the Government’s agenda.
    I’m not sure the argument is still valid in today’s media diverse world.

    And this idea that its Murdoch vs the ABC for media domination in Australia is rubbish. With the amount of websites/newspapers/radio/tv available in Australia, there is no shortage of divergent views available for the astute viewer/reader.

    No one will notice the loss of the ABC or SBS (other than freeing up around 1 billion dollars in funding a year). There is still Fairfax media, Ten, Nine, Seven, Msn, Guardian, Crikey, Macquarie radio etc available.

  • 7
    cartoonmick
    Posted Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    Nice article, Quentin.
    Odd really, how some people let power go to their heads and use it to suppress anything they perceive as a danger to their grip on that power.
    Mind you, normal adults wouldn’t do that. Normal adults with power would perform as expected by the people who gave them that power.
    But I guess that’s what happens in the world of smoke and mirrors.
    In the meantime, the ABC must fight (with our help) for survival.

    A couple of cartoons on the ABC (enemies and future)

    http://cartoonmick.wordpress.com/editorial-political/#jp-carousel-828

    http://cartoonmick.wordpress.com/editorial-political/#jp-carousel-801

    http://cartoonmick.wordpress.com/editorial-political/#jp-carousel-826

    Cheers
    Mick

  • 8
    CML
    Posted Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 7:10 pm | Permalink

    Scott - you are an idiot. Enough said!

  • 9
    babs007
    Posted Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    We have a surfeit of TV news programs and most of our “news” is crime, accidents and similar garbage. No need for the ABC to be presenting this stuff several times a day. The problem with the ABC apparently is a disinterested/complacent board. Mark Scott has come off as pompous and a law unto himself so he needs to get the axe.

  • 10
    klewso
    Posted Thursday, 5 June 2014 at 12:51 am | Permalink

    Murdoch and his apologists :- “You can never have too much diversity of opinion - it confuses the punters”.

  • 11
    AR
    Posted Thursday, 5 June 2014 at 7:19 am | Permalink

    Scrott - “this idea that its Murdoch vs the ABC for media domination in Australia is rubbish” - James “dead fish eyes” Mudorc would disagree with that as he (& young Lauchinvar) have made clear when referring to BBC.

  • 12
    noddy smith
    Posted Thursday, 5 June 2014 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    i wish that the ABC wasn’t so obviously political and agenda-driven so that i could agree with the premise of this article.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...