tip off

Razer’s Class Warfare: you call that a protest?

Students are taking to the streets with home-made signs and jostling former politicians at uni like it’s 1969. Someone has to let these kids know that the old forms of protest have been kaput for some time.

Writer Annabel Crabb has enjoyed freedom from misunderstanding for too long, and so her bollocking by social media this week was as long-overdue as it was (more or less) undeserved. The former press gallery wunderkind dared venture Sunday in her Fairfax column that “the last few decades have turned our world upside down” and that protest had not turned with it.

She was subject to the form and the volume of critique familiar to any writer imprudent enough to suggest the Left is not doing a bang-up job of efficient social change and might want to try something different. She is old, they said; she is irrelevant; she thinks she knows everything; how dare she be so negative; and why doesn’t she just marry Marine Le Pen if she loves hating freedom so much.

After a storm of tweets doused her in enough scorn to wash all the Rosie the Riveter do-rags from The Guardian’s comment pages clean, Crabb was a good enough sport to say she had been wrong. She linked to a blog post Senator Scott Ludlum had already tweeted with all the reasonable humility for which he has become lately known. “PLEASE RETURN TO YOUR DESIGNATED PROTEST ZONES” he offered in majuscule, the official case of easy snark.

The blog post by Alex McKinnon itself is quite funny, and the writer does make the very decent point that protest was never meant to look anything but, as Crabb has it, “dreadful”. I can think of no significant battle that was won by good manners, and thank goodness for Annabel that her foremothers were dreadful enough to throw themselves in front of horses.

I imagine those young, and now quite legitimately angry, people have lately had a gutful from an old media that thrives on easy censure. It must seem that when their protests are wholesome and internet-based, they’re slacktivists. When they’re unseemly and physically present, they’re missing all the marvelous strategic opportunities an online awareness ribbon presents.

It’s easy to understand this frustration, and in recent days John Birmingham has been so eager not to feed it he’s blown a little smoke both ways. On his Fairfax blog, Birmo affirms the might of street protest. On his personal blog, he affirms the might of informal social media protest. It’s all good, apparently, and so say a number of other commentators who are giddy with hope for the future that has not, after all, been headed these past 40 years down a Too Big Too Fail late-capitalist lavatory direct to a feudal sewer. No. Things are on the up-and-up and the Left in buoying its old traditions of street protest, and its new tradition of publishing emotional things online is doing all it can. RETWEET IF U CRY.

I can take or leave online “protest”, myself. What Birmo sees as a gloriously compact J’Accuse, I see as a delusion of power and enlightenment. But I did love seeing the little blighters going politicians and revved up on ABC1’s Q&A.  Frankly, those two minutes of screaming were the best I’ve seen amid a tedious hour of anti-intellectual ping pong in some time. Probably since Zizek talked about the death of the real with half a sandwich in his beard.

The re-emergence of Cold War-era tactics such as we saw deployed toward Julie Bishop make me feel young again. But they don’t make me feel particularly hopeful. I know participation in them feels good, but I am pretty sure that they achieve little beyond that. This is not for a minute to diminish the students’ motivations, which are noble and worthy and right. It is, however, to join Crabb is suggesting that a new era may demand a new form of protest.

It’s unfashionable to agree with Crabb this week; she’s even denounced herself. So I shan’t agree with her mild assertion that digital media channels will free us all, nor will I join her in denying students the same undergraduate pleasures I took in politician-jostling.

But I will say that the Left’s repertoire of contention could do with a little freshening.

And no. I really have no clear idea of how that might look but a solution has never been requisite to the identification of its need. Perhaps Crabb erred in suggesting that her solution would look more sober than recent protest scenes. She did not err, however, in identifying a problem.

And as much as the Micawbers of the new and sunny Left might see revolutionary riches ahead, there is a problem.

Someone has to let these kids know that the old forms of protest have been kaput for some time. The techniques my friends and I used to protest HECS produced fuck-all but an ALP that knew it could get away with neoliberal economic policies as long as it made the right emotional noises to its broader base. Someone needs to let these kids know that there is very little hope.

There is a good case to be made for pessimism and an even better one for devising new tactics for its public expression. There is, of course, a popular view that a positive outlook leads to positive change. But perhaps what we need now most of all is not the tenets of Personal Development but a dose of “This Isn’t Working” administered much more forcefully than Crabb could ever dare.

Birmingham and others are currently happy to give the Left its self-esteem. “You go!” they say. Good job and don’t go changing. You’re perfect as you are. Except, of course, that the world has turned without pause to shit for several decades and an eight-hour day and an early retirement is a dream as distant to the nation’s younger boomers as affordable housing and education are to its younger adults.

And I know this realisation fuels the anger that Crabb found so unseemly. It is not as though younger Australians are unaware that they’ve got a shitty deal. They’re certainly not stupid, but they are new here. For the sake of goodness, let them know that protest must evolve.

22
  • 1
    Vince
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Helen, I think you’re confusing strategy with tactics. The tactic of street protest is a good one! As social creatures, it’s important that us humans actually gather with other humans, interact, discuss, debate, get angry, have fun - it’s how we work - and physical action in the real world ultimately is how change is effected.

    The street protest, of course, needs to be supplemented with all other available forms of protest, online offering us a bunch of options.

    But if the political strategy of the campaign is crap, then that’s where we have a problem.

    All this pessimistic whining about the need to ‘evolve’ beyond street protest completely misses the point that it’s not the ‘old’ forms of protest that are kaput - it’s the idea that market mechanisms are in any way an ‘efficient’ way to organise the allocation of social resources, let alone an entire society.

  • 2
    klewso
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    That degeneration of journalism seems to happen a lot, as they get older and take themselves and their omnipotency of opinions too seriously?

  • 3
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Bring back interpretive dance! More mime! More street theatre!

  • 4
    Helen Razer
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Vince. Hey. Totally. I think you probably know I agree that the campaigning will never be right if the branding is stuffed. But, the brand failure, the refusal to see the market mechanism, is not only a discussion for another time but I think something that legitimately angry students can’t be charged with. And in this case, I think Crabb makes a half-decent point which is: guys this protest stuff is maybe not working as well as once it did.
    Of course, one would never wish to halt the spontaneous expression of anger and I really love seeing those mad-as-hell kids. And I do take your point that physical meeting buoys a movement. It makes people feel good and that is in itself good.
    But, as an effective spectacle, the street protest is as useful as the awareness ribbon and I really do think new times call for new forms of protest. There is no jolt to the footage which recalls Olden Times and signifies to many viewers a memory of the Big Chill soundtrack. Our electronic unconscious is full of such banner-holding brave images and we have seen them so many times, they look nostalgic at best and hackneyed at worst. And while I totally endorse the students’ anger, I have to say that this age of the spectacle demands something new from them.
    I am not for a minute saying that all campaigns are doomed to failure. (Although I am a bit of an Eeyore. Or maybe a Blackboard from Mr Squiggle.) I am just saying that this stuff is not working as a means of jolting public expression. As you say, though. It works for the participants. And that is not nothing.
    Totally agree about the poor strategy. But wanted to talk in the terms everyone else has been this week which is largely “CAMPAIGNS ARE ALWAYS GREAT!” It’s a bit Chose Life for my taste.

  • 5
    Helen Razer
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Yes. Roger. And more cow-bells.

  • 6
    puddleduck
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Nice work, Helen.
    Love reading your stuff.
    Keep up the great work.
    THIS IS NOT A PROTEST
    oLE!

  • 7
    Carlene Colahan
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    Let’s not forget women on stilts & tie dyed t-shirts. Changed a generation they did!

    It was heartening to see the young angry however fruitless. I feel the difference between then & now is that in my day protest had the general public asking what it was about & now they appear to be worried about the manners of the young

  • 8
    Helen Razer
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    Also, Carlene, I think, as indicated previously, that protest as a spectacle (and that is its primary function) has been used in marketing since at least the time of the Virginia Slims campaign. “You’ve Come a Long Way Baby” showed women dressed like Gloria Steinhem and Toni Cade Bambara celebrating their liberation and smoking cigarettes. And I remember seeing QANTAS ads that showed young hip-nikk travelling the world with their anger. This stuff has now become a spectacle so predictable, through no fault of anyone but Madison Avenue, that it needs to change.

  • 9
    Liamj
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Protests are great, speed-dating for those too inhibited, oops socially concious, to admit they want to get laid (cite- personal experience). But considering the LNPs many fronts of attack, uncoordinated push-back on particular issues is trivial, particularly when all the pushback seems to say is ‘make it like before’.

    Wake up and smell the fracking fluids people, we’re past the peak of resource supply and no amount of screaming will bring back the sort of socialist largess that the boomers enjoyed. Realise that the corporate feudalists will always afford the better liars promising more ‘jam tomorrow’. Fine, let them, they will never be able to deliver.

    The backward-facing Left and the mostly dreamy Greens must openly discuss our grim prospects, which are increasingly seeping into the lives of those living outside zone 1, and propose coherent policies to minimise the pain. Only then will they have any sort of significant and durable constituency.

  • 10
    Draco Houston
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    I dismissed Crabb’s article shortly after reading it, because she seemed to have missed the whole twibbon sign my change.org petition stuff

    My pet theory is we have allowed ourselves to be weakened by an insistence that protest must be polite and non violent. Even relatively tame protests are seen as violent, the goal posts constantly moving.

    The anti-CSG blockades are doing well, probably because they are willing to impose their will and force a crisis for the miners and government. And they don’t sit around worrying what people who go on the panel shows think about it. They have diverse support.

  • 11
    Carlene Colahan
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    I agree whole-heartedly. The protest was the attention grabber. 200,000+ people marching against the Vietnam War on one day was a spectacle that made the people at home start thinking & asking questions. The follow up marches & concurrent images of the war on their TVs in their lounge rooms got them joining the dots. The war became unpalatable politically & economically & it still took another two years to withdraw. 40 years later we certainly do need to evolve!

  • 12
    Helen Razer
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    One of the many reasons I love Mad Men so is the way it explores ownership of dissent by marketeers. There was a great pitch by Peggy in the last episode where she is basically talking Marcuse to sell burgers. Even the Frankfurt School (who had some pretty good ideas about ways toward revolution) are used for sale.
    I’m not saying it’s hopeless. I’m just saying there’s too much hope.

  • 13
    Helen Razer
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    Yes, Draco. But I do wonder if naked aggression is not only (or not at all) ineffective because It’s Rude. But because an aggressive unanimity is not what may be needed for more effective protest. There are those believers in radical democracy who stack polls toward conservative ends in the hope of erasing the appearance of democracy. A sort of ultra-Colbert style of agreeing with the ruling class until they look ridiculous. This is one of many techniques that could be tried. I did always love me some Yes Men.

  • 14
    DiddyWrote
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    This is how you protest;

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/the-northerner/2014/may/16/freedom-rides-south-yorkshire-victory

    Coppers don’t like beating the elderly.

  • 15
    CML
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    Aside from the fact that I have no idea exactly what you are trying to say - why use complicated words/sentences when you don’t have to - every man and his dog are discussing this on ALL forms of media. I think the students are making their point very successfully. And I’m a female senior citizen.
    As for Ms ‘Everywhere’ Crabb - her neocon slip is showing!! And, if you are not very careful, you will join her ‘anti-protest’ of one!!

  • 16
    Sue Drain
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    I thought Crabb missed the mark primarily because she conflated “Socialist Alternative” with the protesters as a whole, unfortunately sending a lecture when it should have been a warning regarding the ubiquitous presence of the Trots.

  • 17
    Helen Razer
    Posted Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    Haha, Sue! I think five minutes into one’s first protest, the shiny eyes of the Trots are in themselves warning enough. But even they’ve gone all soft these days. They campaign for marriage. Engels would have been aghast.

  • 18
    Dogs breakfast
    Posted Friday, 30 May 2014 at 12:44 pm | Permalink

    Someone needs to let these kids know that there is very little hope.”

    So true. Perhaps we should tell their parents as well.

    I work at a university and was pleased to see them actually get upset about something. The previous 15 years has seen virtually nothing in terms of uni protests. This is the role of the university student, it’s a pity that the only thing that gets them moving these days came down to self-interest (which will soon be gone when they get their degree).

    Get off your bums kids, active dissent actually is the way it always has been, and always will be. Media people, ironically, would be the last people to turn to for advice on how to get the anger out. They will always send you down their channels of broadcasting, self interest wins again, and tweeting up a storm was going to have no impact whatsoever. Blimey, calling the kids unimaginative, and then recommending social media!!!! That’s just sad.

    But I have to suggest that women walking around with T-shirts emblazoned with “F — - Tony Abbott” just didn’t send the right message, in my humble opinion.

    Cheers Helen, your article was a worthwhile contribution, even though I don’t agree with all of it. Annabel was fresh and new, and as with us all, now looks more establishment. But boy does she do social media. Wow, what a revolutionary.

  • 19
    64magpies
    Posted Friday, 30 May 2014 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    …been headed these past 40 years down a Too Big Too Fail late-capitalist lavatory direct to a feudal sewer.”
    Beautiful.

  • 20
    Connor Drum
    Posted Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    Hi Helen - I am an irregular Crikey reader, and I usually don’t comment on comments sections because no good can ever come of it. However, I’m also one of the ANU students who organised and ran a couple of protests over the last week and a half, in total pulling more than a thousand students - not counting the staff and wider community involvement which was, dare I say, significant.

    I suppose one point I’d make about the effectiveness of otherwise of the protest march as one tool amongst others, is that it’s best targeted locally. Yes, there is certainly scope for protests to scare the shit out of politicians, executives and mandarins alike when they manifest in the tens or hundreds of thousands in city streets - but that’s clearly not what (at least we) were hoping to achieve. As students at a university nominally lead by the chief of the Group of 8, our goal is the removal of VC Ian Young, and the institution of a democratic system of Chancelry appointment. The first goal, at least, is possible - mainly because the man is an idiot who has all on his own undermined almost all support he has from general staff and academics/PhD candidates. Undergraduates are starting to come around as well (although a three year span from entry to graduation punctuated with Fun obviously makes it hard to maintain the rage in a corporate sense).

    Before anyone replies “but he’s not in the government, you twerp” - I know, and thank you for your contribution. He is, however, one of the most powerful lobbyist voices for the university sector in Australia, and the only Vice-Chancellor who has been comfortable coming out on national television and publicly saying that he has no idea how fee deregulation is going to work, but fuck, he’ll do it anyway. His role in legitimating fee deregulation should not be underestimated, both for government and for wider public discussion. After all, if the person who is supposed to know most about this says it’s a good idea, you might be persuaded to think he’s telling the truth, and that it is one.

    I’d also point out that street protest is but one thing happening around campus in terms of trying galvanise opposition to fee deregulation broadly, and Ian Young personally. I won’t go into too much detail because you’ve already read this far (and because it turns out that the ANU has a whole bureau devoted to monitoring whatever we do on Facebook etc.) but you might;ve seen mention of the Read-In happening at the ANU - Annabel Crabbe at least deigned to give it her tick of approval. What it has become is a space where information around deregulation and university policy is being discussed on a regular basis, and where that information is freely available and centrally located for anyone interested. All kinds of people are coming along, from rosy-cheeked and shirted trots to Young Labor hopefuls wrapped in chinos and cheap blazers, which means that we have both broad support AND lots of different kinds of campaigning expertise, outside of banner painting and wearing sturdy boots.

    I’d just make one final point as well - there really is not, and never will be any substitute for foot leather. The internet might be great for organising, but if you want to convince someone you’ll have to actually talk to them like they’re a real person with actual concerns, especially if you want them to join you in doing or arguing for something specific. This is what we’re doing everyday, and this is one of the important functions of street protest.

  • 21
    Ian
    Posted Monday, 2 June 2014 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    When in the minority as the active progressive left is in this country then you have to do whatever you can to get your views across. This includes protest rallies, letters to the editor, petitioning, submissions and on and on.

    We have a problem that the major parties, big business and the corporate media are all on the same side in this conflict and they have the money and power to ignore, demonize or put down any sort of dissent if they see it as threatening the status quo.

  • 22
    Elbow Patches
    Posted Tuesday, 3 June 2014 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    Some pretty inspirational photographs of the recent Bentley Blockade.

    http://www.rjpoole.com/galleries/the-battle-for-bentley

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...