A credit ratings downgrade? Bring it on, we say. What the Senate can do with the budget: a Crikey explainer. And Essential reveals what we like (and don’t). The life and current tumultuous times of Nathan Tinkler. It’s more martial law in Thailand. Telstra’s big investment in wireless and why it makes sense. Plus the rich and poor in theatre circles.
“If these necessary measures don’t pass the Senate our AAA credit rating is at risk, and if we lose our AAA credit rating we pay higher rates of interest on our debt, and that means it’s more than $1 billion a month, every single month, just to pay the interest on the borrowings.”
“… new headlines on the subject are now crossing the wires, indicating that ‘there is no immediate risk to Australia’s AAA rating’, adding that ‘stable aust. rating means less than 1-in-3 odds of change’.”
“The Reserve Bank doesn’t particularly respect Standard & Poor’s and its incorporation of politics into their ratings. If you look at the US, its position has improved immeasurably in the past year, despite S&P’s downgrade. Moody’s and Fitch didn’t change the US rating, and later this year a very chastened S&P will lift the US rating back to AAA — it has changed its US outlook from negative to positive, which says an upgrade is on the way.”
Not to mention (which Keane and Dyer do in making a compelling case) the impact on forcing down the value of the Australian dollar — a godsend for local business.
Too much of Australia’s economic debate is built on mythology. The truth is inconvenient for a government trying to sell the most unnecessary budget levers.