When ‘women are slaves’, and Australia just ignores it

It was a nightmare come true when more than 200 people went missing in mysterious circumstances recently. They have still not been found, and their families are desperate.

But because these people were Nigerian schoolgirls abducted by militants for daring to go to school, rather than well-off people on an airplane, the Australian media and government have paid it scant attention.

Compare the two. On March 8, Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 disappeared with 239 people on board. On April 16, armed militants attacked a school in Nigeria where girls had gathered to take a physics exam. More than 250 girls were taken and remain missing. The Islamic group Boko Haram, which opposes the education of girls, has claimed responsibility. Leader Abubakar Shekau said this in a recent video:

I abducted your girls. I will sell them in the market, by Allah … Women are slaves. I want to reassure my Muslim brothers that Allah says slaves are permitted in Islam … I will marry off a woman at the age of 12. I will marry off a girl at the age of nine.”

There are reports some girls (mostly aged 16-18) have already been sold into “marriage” for $12, some have died, and some have been taken to neighbouring countries. Nigerian troops are massing near where many of the girls are being held captive.

And this is how Australia has reacted. Crikey has tracked how many times the Australian media mentioned MH370 and the Nigerian schoolgirls for the two weeks following each incident. There were 2446 mentions for the plane and 60 for the schoolgirls. There were almost 700 television mentions of MH370, compared to one television mention for the Nigerian schoolgirls.

As to the Australian government’s response, Crikey has not been able to find any reference to the abduction of the schoolgirls from Prime Minister Tony Abbott (who has staged repeated media events to talk about MH370) or Foreign Minister Julie Bishop.

Bishop has issued 13 media releases since the abduction, e.g. “Appointment to the Australia-China Council Board”. None relate to the schoolgirls.

Australia currently sits on the United Nations Security Council and has recently used the role to raise awareness of Anzac Day and comment on the Israel/Palestine situation. It does not appear Australia has raised the issue of the Nigerian captives at the UNSC.

The Australian government has not issued any statements in relation to the kidnappings.

The idea of selling off whole lots of young women should be creating banner headlines; instead of that we’ve got seven pages on James Packer’s fight.”

Some might suggest it’s not the role of the Australian government to intervene, and Africa is not considered to be within Australia’s sphere of influence (which is Asia-Pacific). But Australia has long had a focus within its aid and development program on educating girls in the developing world, as have Australian NGOs. We do have a relationship with the West African nation; there is a Nigerian High Commission in Canberra, and an Australian High Commission in Abuja, Nigeria (i.e., both countries are in the British Commonwealth). Australia imports more than $2 billion in crude petroleum from Nigeria a year. Nigeria is far from a small player; it’s the most populous country in Africa.

And other Western countries that have promoted girls’ education have been active on the issue. United States Secretary of State John Kerry said this last week:

The kidnapping of hundreds of children by Boko Haram is an unconscionable crime … We will do everything possible to support the Nigerian government to return these young women to their homes and hold the perpetrators to justice.”

Page 1 of 2 | Next page

Tags: , , ,

Categories: Federal, MEDIA

19 Responses

Comments page: 1 |
  1. I must be living in a different media landscape but I have seen a huge amount of coverage about this story and even tonnes of facebook posts, etc. To be honest, I was actually quite pleased that this story did get comparatively good coverage in the media here, unlike for example a couple of other recent terrorism bombings in Nigeria. I must admit that I’m somewhat prejudiced here because I’ve worked in Nigeria for a short while and so stories about the place automatically prick up my ears. But still, I’ve been positively surprised by the amount of coverage.

    I’ve been even more surprised by the large amount of stories I’ve seen in the last couple of weeks about the ‘lack of coverage’ which just doesn’t correspond with what I’m seeing.

    But I also think comparing it to the MH370 story is misguided. As horrible as both events are, the MH370 has a massive mystery behind it which will always get more coverage. The sad thing though is that if the abducted girls would have been, say, American or even just “blonde”, then it would have been wall-to-wall saturation coverage here.

    The one area where I agree with you is on the Australian government silence. But then, I don’t know what good a Julie Bishop or Tony Abbott would be in this situation either.

    by Saugoof on May 6, 2014 at 1:29 pm

  2. The US can be useful because it’s a global superpower with airborne satellites and other tools to potentially provide useful info to Nigeria. Beyond money, what can Australia do? Hand wring more publically?

    by Alex on May 6, 2014 at 1:43 pm

  3. Hi Saugoof, where have you been reading the coverage in the Oz media? There’s been quite a bit on the ABC, but not much elsewhere. I actually think there’s been a lot on this issue on social media - lots of interest on FB etc. Interesting.

    by Cathy Alexander on May 6, 2014 at 1:52 pm

  4. My first encounter with this story was way back on 26 April, and as that story itself says ( it was old news then.

    This news is downright stale — the kidnapping occurred over a week ago on April 15th — so if you’re only hearing about it now, turn around and slap your news-provider for ignoring it.

    Yet as far as I can tell, this is the first time Crikey’s mentioned it. Consider yourselves slapped, Crikey.

    And Eva Cox might have the best intentions but “…questions why Australia has spent so much money looking for MH370 but does not appear to have even offered to help Nigeria rescue the girls” is embarrassing overegging. Um, geography?

    by Mark Duffett on May 6, 2014 at 2:14 pm

  5. I know it’s been said but the point seems to have been lost: 250 schoolgirls studying science, abducted, some killed, some raped, some sold into slavery. Can you imagine the response of the Australian government and the commercial media if they were white?

    by Ingle Knight on May 6, 2014 at 2:27 pm

  6. You’re absolutely right Cathy. A mere 60 mentions in the media and none in Crikey.

    Slap yourselves over the wrist with a wet bus ticket!

    by David Hand on May 6, 2014 at 3:20 pm

  7. I have heard and read plenty about the “missing” schoolgirls so not sure what the author is on about. Also to compare with MH370 is ridiculous. MH370 is a long-time mystery whereas everyone knows what happened to the poor girls - including the Nigerian Government. They should be doing something about it but I suspect they have vested interests. As an aside - I really really hope that Muslim leaders have condemned the actions and in particular those comments by Abubakar Shekau (may he rot in ….). I suspect they probably have but if so more prominance should be given to them.

    by mikeb on May 6, 2014 at 3:29 pm

  8. Julie Bishop must read Crikey.
    She’s just tweeted this.
    Australia condemns abduction of 200 girls and offers support to Nigeria

    by paddy on May 6, 2014 at 4:57 pm

  9. As the bien pissant get the vapours over their lattes (the cost of one of which would buy one these students a school uniform) they should realise that one reason why these young women are not being sought overly energetically is that they are already ‘damaged goods’.
    Even had they been kept in a seraglio with a dozen over muscled Nubian eunuchs and several fearsome den mothers, the suspicion would forever reduce their value (not the same as “worth”).
    Before any xenophobes just up & down, i suggest that they check Gen. 24:67 and out the Talmudic obfuscation that has mumbled on for millennia as to whether Rachel was intacto purely by virtue of her having been escorted by Abe’s servant, sworn on the oath of his patriarchal testes.

    by AR on May 6, 2014 at 6:05 pm

  10. When the country is run by the white bread tribe of middle aged to elderly, wealthy, narrow-minded, conservative males, and one woman, it is not surprising that the abduction of a bunch of female darkies receives little attention.
    The Christian standards these guys espouse do not extend to worrying too much about the dark continent, certainly not as far as commenting or offering any assistance. It is plain, unexpurgated racism, with a dollop of misogyny.

    by Pedantic, Balwyn on May 6, 2014 at 6:24 pm

  11. Cathy #3
    There were several stories about this in The Guardian, a couple in The Age as well although they’ve only recently ramped up their coverage on this somewhat. I read a lot of European media as well though, one of the benefits of speaking more than one language. It may well be that I’ve mixed up coverage from media there with Australian coverage, so maybe it’s just my impression that I’m seeing this story everywhere.

    by Saugoof on May 6, 2014 at 6:46 pm

  12. The real reason it’s got no high profile coverage in Australia is the absence of pictures. TV news is addicted to visuals and so far there are none.

    If someone got an iPhone recording of these young women going on a slave auction block in Central Africa, it would be wall to wall blanket coverage and the tabloid TV shows would have crews parachuting into Niger or Chad with loaded chequebooks within 24 hours.

    It’s oh so trendy to blame old white men for this. And so shallow, tiresome and abusive.

    by David Hand on May 6, 2014 at 7:20 pm

  13. Damn you Hand, this is the 2nd or 3rd time I have agreed with you.
    Stop it! Go back to your usual schtik.

    by AR on May 6, 2014 at 7:23 pm

  14. David Hand #12
    That’s not really true. Sure the news is addicted to pictures and if there were any dramatic ones there would be wall-to-wall coverage of it. But if those girls were blonde then we’d get the same saturation coverage whether there’s pictures or not.

    by Saugoof on May 6, 2014 at 9:17 pm

  15. Saugoof,
    You actually agree that pictures would lift the profile of the story and give it more coverage.

    Your blonde comment is a fact free act of stereotyping.

    by David Hand on May 6, 2014 at 9:27 pm

  16. The piece was entitled “When ‘women are slaves’, and Australia just ignores it” however goes on to cite media and government correspondence as justification. Last I checked neither was doing a great job of representing Australia, at least the one I live in. Even more tragic is the notion that FB may offer the granularity that appears missing from the conventional media. A first world issue uncovered by a third world tragedy.

    by Fin Robertson on May 6, 2014 at 11:08 pm

  17. WTF is Australia supposed to do when some looney black Islamists start doing a Taliban in Nigeria??

    We could wring hands and knash teeth, but short of sending in the Army, nothing but express outrage can be done.

    Goodluck’s government seems too scared of harming the girls or themselves to take action so far.

    What can be said is that a society where a gang can comtemplate selling their fellow beings for $12 each is one from which we have thankfully evolved some time ago.

    by Ken Lambert on May 6, 2014 at 11:36 pm

  18. Saufgood, yes, especially in the first two weeks after the abduction, there was more on the story in the overseas media, especially Europe. And here, the ABC has been the outlet covering the situation, with the Guardian ramping up its coverage over time, and The Age now doing the same.

    I’ve noticed that people who consume a fair amount of international media are tending to say ‘but this story has been reported on,’ which is a good reason to consume more international media!

    by Cathy Alexander on May 7, 2014 at 8:55 am

  19. Look, the Liberal government has a budget emergency to deal with and boats to turn back. You can’t really expect them to sweat the small stuff.

    by Graeski on May 7, 2014 at 10:38 am

« | »