tip off

A lot of moolah for a mogul melee … will it pay off for News Corp?

What you do when you don’t own the photos to the mogul punch-up of the decade. And what you do when you do. Will News Corp’s expensive scoop pay off?

What do you do when you can’t show the photos? You get the cartoonists on it. That was how Fairfax tackled the millionaire mogul punch-up of the decade …

It’s News Corporation rivals, meanwhile, splashed big on the story. It got more coverage in most of the company’s tabloids than the Commission of Audit did last week — a full nine pages in The Daily Telegraph, seven in the Herald Sun, six in The Courier-Mail, four in The Advertiser and two in the NT News. Editors are trying to justify the investment of the company — reportedly between $210,000 and $250,000 for 50 snaps and a short video of the fight.

Commercially, they’re selling more papers because of it, according to the newsagents Crikey rung this morning. “It’s everywhere and all in good fun,” one inner-Sydney newsagent told us. “There’s certainly been plenty of interest.” Commuters into Sydney noticed far more Daily Telegraphs being read than normal.

Far fewer than 50 photographs have been revealed so far, which means we could see more of this story unfolding through the tabloids over the next few days. It’s a story News Corp will own — a leading copyright lawyer told us that while fair use exemptions to images do apply for reporting the news, they’d doubt a media organisation would risk the wrath of News Corp by republishing them.

News Corp could argue that the photos themselves are not necessary to reporting on the fight. “I suspect publication by another outlet wouldn’t fly under fair use,” the lawyer said. “It’d be brave of another publisher to take them on.”

Indeed, other publishers have tread carefully. Fairfax went with drawings. A video of the fight has been replayed by both Sky and the ABC this morning, but the networks made no attempt to remove the News Corp logos emblazoned across it. Online, plenty of social media users posted the photos to their own networks, but intriguingly, most publishers have embedded these tweets rather than republishing the photos themselves in their online news reports.

It might be harder to protect copyright than ever, but on this type of story, Australia’s media is playing it safe. News Corp may yet get its money’s worth out of its expensive scoop.

9
  • 1
    prodigy
    Posted Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Who gives a rats ….

  • 2
    MJPC
    Posted Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Prodigy,
    Two capitalist schoolboy “friends” going the biff…I am with you.
    Just goes to show that money does not beget civility.

  • 3
    Raaraa
    Posted Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    7 pages of massive photos in the local Hun. It’s as if they’re trying to drown out some other news….

  • 4
    mikeb
    Posted Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    I found this wallowing in tabloid muck strangely satisfying.

  • 5
    JacetheAce
    Posted Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    This is not about News Corp making money; this is about Lachlan helping out Jamie and turning the whole thinkg into a big, harmless joke. The Tele and Herald Sun, who have dedicated endless front pages to ‘senseless street violence’ and ‘drunken, yobbo hoodlums’ now decides that that violence, when perpeatrated by rich and influential men is, really, nothing more than a bit of good old biff. As if this had been Joe and Tim Blow coming to loggerheads, and no-one’s the worse for wear. All good, Australian fun.

    Next week, when this is all forgotten and police action ceased (because what kind of wowser would take this seriously!), we’ll have a story about some up and coming 18 year old footballer king hit in the Cross and the hoodlum who bashed him held up to scorn and ridicule with some pithy headline.

  • 6
    AR
    Posted Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    If anti theist such as I am inclined to offer a libation at the altar of Nemesis.
    Hubris’ fishnet tights are now torn & stained.

  • 7
    Matt Hardin
    Posted Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    When are they going to be charged? There seems to be enough evidence that assault has taken place.

  • 8
    AR
    Posted Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Shoutjock Hately going nuts about public violence on Wed. morning but this wasn’t it. This was just two mates doing wot mates do.
    No, the public were involved, hence the name of the charge, “public affray”.
    It is our sense of civis that has been affronted, violated and they should be charged, just like in Mt Druitt & Moree, every night & day.

  • 9
    klewso
    Posted Friday, 9 May 2014 at 8:25 am | Permalink

    Just more dispensing of indulgences by our media.
    Against their otherwise high profile condemnation of public assault, what does their treatment of this incident - with Limited News’s “paw prints” all over it - say of their real attitude for the general public?

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...