tip off

Palmer, Greens win the West — now Abbott must play ball

The major parties had an unprecedented 58% of the vote in a clear sign voters are looking for alternatives. The Greens, who outspent Labor and the Coalition, were big winners, as was Palmer United.

Saturday’s unprecedented Western Australian Senate election has finally settled the make-up of the chamber’s crossbench after July 1. But Prime Minister Tony Abbott might have a few more weeks to wait until he can be sure of the strength of his government’s hand.

Despite a collective slump in the major party vote, there is a strong possibility that the general thrust of the September election result will be confirmed, with three Liberals likely to be returned along with an uncertain assortment of Labor and minor party members.

However, it is still far from clear that the third Liberal candidate, Linda Reynolds, will indeed emerge victorious when the final votes are tallied; the alternative possibility being that Labor Senator Louise Pratt will scrape home on the back of an improved trend in postal, pre-poll and absent votes.

On the former scenario, the government would require six out of eight crossbench votes to pass legislation when Labor and the Greens lined up against it, and would be well on its way if it could win over a four-person Palmer United bloc that will include the newly elected Zhenya (or Dio) Wang and Victorian Senator Ricky Muir of the Motoring Enthusiasts Party.

Otherwise, the government will only be able to wear one dissenter out of Nick Xenophon, John Madigan of the DLP, Bob Day of Family First, David Leyonhjelm of the Liberal Democrats, and the PUP bloc (assuming the latter holds together).

A strong hand for the crossbench would seem a fitting outcome for an election that gave neither major party anything to crow about, with the Liberals down 5.5% on the September election to 33.7%, and Labor down 4.8% to a dismal 21.8%.

Worse still for the Liberals was that 2% had been freed up by a drop in support for the Nationals, who were down from a high of 5.1% in September when their candidate was former West Coast Eagles star David Wirrpanda.

Nonetheless, it’s Labor that has suffered the bigger embarrassment, as the swing comes off what was already the party’s worst WA Senate result since federation, and the Liberals at least have the excuse that governments usually do badly at byelections. By any standard, a combined major party vote of 58.1% is a remarkable result, given that the equivalent figure of 70.9% from September was without any precedent since the two-party system first coalesced in 1910.

The beneficiaries this time around were not the micro-parties, although their collective total of 13.3% was only slightly down on the September result of 14.5%, and their failure to yield a contender for a seat was mostly down to looser preference arrangements. Instead, the story of the night was the triumph of the Greens and Palmer United, whose candidates easily won election off respective gains of 6.7% and 7.4%.

Scott Ludlam sealed his reputation as one of the Greens’ star performers with a 16.2% share of the vote, marking the fourth occasion the party has secured a 14.3% quota off its own bat, after Bob Brown’s and Christine Milne’s wins in Tasmania in 2007 and 2010, and Richard di Natale’s in Victoria in 2010.

Ludlam’s clear win was a heartening reversal for the Greens after their recent form, although the real lesson to be drawn is that the ebbs and flows in their support are not to be over-analysed either by their champions or their detractors. The inflation of the Greens vote in 2010 mostly represented a negative response to Labor’s leadership disarray and abandonment of carbon pricing, while its weaker showing last year — interpreted by wishful thinkers on the Right as the first stage of a downward plunge to irrelevance — was merely a reversion to type, with perhaps some assistance from the loss of Brown’s personal vote.

The circumstance of a Senate-only election could hardly have been more favourable for the Greens, who had everything to fight for and were unusually well-placed to influence the agenda of a campaign that lacked the presidential aspect of a conventional federal election. As reported in The Sydney Morning Herald last week, advertising monitoring agency Ebuiqity estimated the party’s advertising spend at roughly equal to the combined total for Liberal and Labor, for whom the precise calibration of Senate numbers is a secondary concern.

No less important to the Greens was an energised base of largely tertiary-educated supporters with a high awareness of the election and its importance to the party. By contrast, Labor’s large constituencies of low-income and non-English speaking voters were presumably over-represented among the voters who failed to show up.

A mirror image of the Greens’ success was provided by Palmer United, who are assured of reaching a quota from their base vote of 12.5% (up from 5% in September) thanks to a 4.5% reserve in preferences from sources including HEMP, Shooters & Fishers and Family First. Even more so than the Greens, Clive Palmer was able to put his own stamp on the campaign agenda in lieu of a high profile by the major parties, in his case by promoting Palmer United as a vehicle for a vote against Canberra.

This is always a popular message in WA, and Palmer found an ideal catalyst for it in the state’s ever-dwindling share of GST revenue — together, of course, with the means to propagate it through a reported $477,000 ad spend that dwarfed that of all other parties combined.

A superficial reading of the result might be that Palmer United drew votes from the Coalition parties while the Greens did so from Labor. However, Labor’s research suggests the picture was more complicated, with Palmer United poaching votes in almost equal measure from each side of the major party fence.

In spite of the parlous Labor vote, it follows that some of the 7.5% lost to the Coalition parties resulted from a modest shift of votes from government to opposition, such as byelections typically produce.

Had WA been witness on Saturday to a mere House of Representatives byelection, in which minor parties would have had very little to play for, chances are the result wouldn’t have given electoral prognosticators much to discuss.

19
  • 1
    Raaraa
    Posted Monday, 7 April 2014 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    The focus too often has been Lib vs Lab or Lab + Greens vs Coalition or even Lab + Greens vs Coalition + PUP.

    Realistically, it looks more like it’s Lib + Lab vs the others and there has been a significant downward trend for totals votes going for the Big 2 parties.

    To those who say that minor parties are irrelevant were dismissing the fact that most governments in the past have had to negotiate with crossbenches to get bills through.

  • 2
    peterh_oz
    Posted Monday, 7 April 2014 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Multiple and strong second-tier parties is good for our democracy, although the vested interest and bankrolling of PUP worries me. But any reduction in the dupoply is a bonus. If only the House of Reps had the same/similar system as in the Senate (ie proportional representation, such as in NZ), we might see some actual democracy and real debate there too.

  • 3
    John Anderson
    Posted Monday, 7 April 2014 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    The Senate preference voting ticket for HEMP shows Labor being preferenced before PUP. Then the Greens. HEMP’s 1% will therefore flow to Labor’s Pratt, not PUP. One small hope for Labor is that if PUP’s primary vote falls from 12.49% to say under 12% once pre-polls et al are counted, then the PUP will have to swallow up even more micro party preferences to get a quota. It means fewer right-of-centre micro party preferences would flow to the LIBs who will need every preference it can get to gain three quotas.

  • 4
    Posted Monday, 7 April 2014 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    You are quite correct, John. Apologies - scratch HEMP from my list of PUP preference feeders.

  • 5
    zut alors
    Posted Monday, 7 April 2014 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    …the PUP bloc (assuming the latter holds together).’

    That’s a big assumption.

    I imagine Palmer’s finger puppets will behave themselves initially but, once they breathe the air in Canberra, we should not be surprised by any fallouts. Can’t wait to see Clive’s face when he eventually realises he can’t simply sack anyone who refuses to toe the line.

  • 6
    John Ryan
    Posted Monday, 7 April 2014 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    West Australians are going to find out what voting for a Carpetbagger really means,Palmer is the ultimate Carpetbagger
    and the mugs fell for it hook line and sinker.
    WA voters will live to regret this

  • 7
    The Pav
    Posted Monday, 7 April 2014 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    It will be interesting to see how honest the PUP is using the defintion that an honest politician is one who when bought stays bought because Abbott will be totally reckless in the political bribes that he offers to obtain PUP votes.

    His problem is that Palmer will out negotiate Abbott by the length of the straight and the cost will be horrendous

  • 8
    Elvis
    Posted Monday, 7 April 2014 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    An extraordinary result for PUP senator-elect Wang. An engineer born and educated in China, he arrived in Australia in 2003 and became an Australian citizen in 2009. I wish him all the very best, and hope Clive treats him decently.
    Wang has some sensible views on the environment (e.g. renewable energy) but how can Wang possibly express an equal opinion in the party room when Clive had him elected off his own money and personality?

  • 9
    Tyger Tyger
    Posted Monday, 7 April 2014 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    It’s been entertaining reading LNP and ALP supporters go after each other on various blogs following this result:
    “You’re the loser!”
    “No, you’re the loser!”
    I agree!
    And the report in The Age today of union and faction heavyweight Bill Shorten saying Labor had to reform to be relevant. Reform what exactly, Bill? The disproportionate influence of union and faction heavyweights?

  • 10
    CML
    Posted Tuesday, 8 April 2014 at 1:29 am | Permalink

    Who cares about the morons in WA? This was a Senate byelection ONLY, and even if the low Labor vote is repeated at the next federal election, it will make virtually no difference to the final outcome. Federal elections are won and lost largely in NSW and Vic.
    The voters in WA were li+d to by Palmer, about the GST, and they lapped it up like the fools they are. Palmer cannot and never will influence the GST state split, and WA has to learn to live with the fact that they have more than their fair share of mining riches. What they conveniently forget over there, is that the other states topped up their finances in WA for over 100 years, until the mineral deposits were discovered. And today, they want more, more, more - just like the selfish bast+rds they are.
    So - when you have dug up all the riches over there, and squandered the profits, you will be back for more of other states money. Change your ways, or it may not happen!

  • 11
    AR
    Posted Tuesday, 8 April 2014 at 6:01 am | Permalink

    A small hope is that Bullock stands down “for personal reasons” and the next person on the ticket, ie Pratt, assumes the place.
    As others have pointed out, the real story is “a plague on both your houses” to the ‘majors’ - not just the Greens almost at parity with Labor but the overall spurning of the usual suspects by the electorate.
    Labor has been dead for a decade, the only movement is due to the necrotic worms - looking you Shorten and all your ilk, vat extruded apparatchiks without any sign of original, let alone independent, thought.

  • 12
    MJPC
    Posted Tuesday, 8 April 2014 at 7:59 am | Permalink

    @John Ryan, wholly agreed. Citizen Abbott, fresh back with his Asian circus, will be looking forward to happy times in the Senate with fellow traveling PUP’s come July.
    Right, Palmer may be anti Carbon and Mining taxes but he will only get rid of them after some serious horse trading by the Government.
    Abetz might be all touchy feely for the new comers, lets see what he says past July when Palmer starts calling in some favours and the LNP have to eat humble pie.
    On another matter, Go Greens!

  • 13
    Malcolm Street
    Posted Tuesday, 8 April 2014 at 8:41 am | Permalink

    CML - Palmer has been too clever by half with his GST push. In any forthcoming state or federal election campaign they can now be painted as WA stooges and/or liars.

  • 14
    Malcolm Street
    Posted Tuesday, 8 April 2014 at 8:42 am | Permalink

    Oh and also, PUP gets a WA rep, GST isn’t changed, what happens to PUP in WA at the next senate election? One-trick pony?

  • 15
    Bill Parker
    Posted Tuesday, 8 April 2014 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    Come on CML we are not all morons. And I do not take too kindly to being identified as such. The fact that Palmer the CB achieved what he did was largely due to the ad spend.

    The man I feel sorry for is Wang and the heavy hand above him. Let’s hope he has the courage of his convictions and stands up for his ideals.

    And as a matter of record, the “morons” as you insultingly call is CML (the anonymous) voted for sensible man at least. I refer to Scott Ludlam.

  • 16
    Liamj
    Posted Tuesday, 8 April 2014 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Given the declining vote of Lab, it is time the media stopped referring to only Labor as ‘the opposition’.

    Donning my tinfoil hat, i seem to recall that Clives future fortunes are dependant on Chinese investors, so perhaps Clive is the sockpuppet, not Dio Wang. If Wang doesn’t start filing in the nearly-blank background and his-masters-voice foreground, then the theories will only get wilder.

  • 17
    Steve777
    Posted Tuesday, 8 April 2014 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    It won’t be easy for Tony Abbott. He doesn’t do negotiation.

  • 18
    Tyger Tyger
    Posted Wednesday, 9 April 2014 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    CML @10, ever been to WA? I have. I lived and worked over there for seven years. There’s quite a few people there, more and more by the day and many of those from NSW and Victoria. I can assure you, while it contains its fair share of morons, you’ll find your usual mix, most neither more nor less self-interested than the rest of us as regards issues like the GST.
    The fact Labor has struggled to pick up more than a few seats there has been a factor in recent Federal elections, while Queensland’s wild swings have been as important as those in NSW and moreso than the relatively stable numbers in Vic. It’s a pretty dated picture of this country you’ve got in your head.

  • 19
    CML
    Posted Wednesday, 9 April 2014 at 6:14 pm | Permalink

    Tyger - have only just read your comment. Anyone who votes for Palmer or the Greens is still a moron in my book. And I will thank you to stop your insulting comments of my ‘pretty dated picture’ crap.
    I have been a student of Labor politics all my life - over 70 years. I have lived the events that you younger people read about in history books. My uncle was a Labor member of parliament in a state government for some years, so I also have some inside knowledge.
    What is happening inside Labor at present, has been going on to a greater or lesser degree for as long as I can remember. It is NOT the Labor party which has gone off the rails so much, but the Union movement. Those drunk with power in the latter need to be excised, and we need to get back to union officials working for their members, NOT themselves.
    If this doesn’t happen over the next couple of years, then there will be a second (1955 type) split, IMHO. The media and the conservative forces in this country, love these union Judas types (think K Jackson et al), most of whom should be in prison.
    Just remember that the MSM, especially the Murdoch variety, will do ANYTHING (look at the UK experience) to destroy Labor. That is their main mission in life. It has been going on for as long as I have been alive. And people believe all the crap that is fed to them.
    Why do you think you have to work so hard to convince a couple of deniers that climate change is real? Because you have the MSM of the same brand dishing up total rubbish on this issue, day in, day out. All for their own grubby, greedy reasons, of course.
    Now, just substitute Climate Debate for Labor Party, and you begin to get the picture!!!!!

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...