tip off

Tips and rumours

A thousand jobs to go at Leighton? … senior cabin staff are walking from Qantas … Sports Party sticking with sexist Facebook gag …

From the Crikey grapevine, the latest tips and rumours …

Axe to fall at Leighton? We received this Spanish-flavoured tip about job losses at construction giant Leighton:

Leighton’s Spanish management about to sack 1000 more workers. A senior manager at Leighton has been moaning — as one would — about this.”

This may well come to pass. There have been rumours about job losses at Leighton (a Sydney-based contracting firm involved in construction, mining and engineering, both here and overseas). The Spanish link is that Marcelino Fernandez Verdes has just taken over as Leighton chief. He was formerly with Hochtief, which is trying to increase its stake in Leighton. And that’s set the hares running, because Hochieff’s bidding statement (consider it as asking someone on a date) said this, two weeks ago:

HOCHTIEF considers Leighton’s employees to be an integral part of Leighton’s operations. However, as a result of the general review by Leighton already underway, some employees may become redundant …”

Verdes has also said he’s overseeing a general review of Leighton that may end in changes to operations, and “changes in the number and functions of employees required in each operating unit and the possible divestment of certain assets or businesses”. And when do reviews ever lead to jobs being created?

Sounds like malas noticias for the folk at Leighton. We’ve put the tip to Leighton, who directed us to previous media statements about possible redundancies.

Have you or someone you know been sacked? Let us know at boss@crikey.com.au with the subject line “Sackwatch”.

Qantas turbulence. Qantas can’t have been an easy place to work of late, what with Alan Joyce reporting a loss and keen to sack lots of people. We’ve heard that some cabin crew are feeling harassed by management and “a number of the senior ones are walking — a management dream as it costs nothing and they will get their KPI bonuses”. Apparently there’s a fair bit of ill-feeling towards Joyce (not exactly surprising). It’s a pity if Qantas’ senior cabin staff are walking; it was a positive point of difference that unlike other airlines we could name, Qantas did not just hire good-looking 23-year-olds who looked like they spent all their time on their hair and wouldn’t be much help in an emergency. Give us an experienced, mature-aged flight attendant any day.

Sports’ jocks under fire. On Friday Tips brought you a Facebook post from the Australian “Sports” Party, which is running in the WA Senate recount this Saturday (and which won a seat in one of the previous recounts). The post features a picture of a topless woman jogging and a joke about men only doing exercise if they get to bonk sexy young women, while being terrified of gay men. Nice.

Since our tip, it’s become clear that not everyone likes the joke. A women’s group has called on the party to apologise, and more than 150 people have have commented on the post, most of them critical. “Sure it’s a joke. But this is a Facebook page for a political party, not your mate Dazza,” said one person. “You’d have to be a real dropulich to vote for the Australian Sports Party. This post reads more like an advertisement for the Playboy Mansion. Pathetic really,” said another.

There’s also a claim posted on the party’s Facebook page that the party has been censoring comments critical of the gag from the main page (we certainly couldn’t see many). The post is still live, and there’s been no apology, so yes, this is what the Australian Sports Party is all about.

Trouble in the Victorian ALP? As Victorian politics heats up — an election is coming in November and Labor are a real chance to unseat the Liberal government — this comes from a mole:

The gay group within the Victorian ALP is plagued by issues, with many members claiming they never received a call for nominations for the recent election of the state executive. The nominations closed well before many members knew it was even open. Then a factional deal was taken to select the executive without the need of a vote.”

Whitewashing Williamson. This comes from a reader about the sentencing of disgraced HSU heavy Michael Williamson on Friday:

The Fairfax media and our ABC are apparently unaware that convicted fraudster Michael Williamson was federal Labor Party president 2009-2010, president of Unions NSW until 2012, and a longstanding board member of  the ACTU. A notable omission, given the blanket coverage of Liberal MP Arthur Sinodinos appearing as a witness before ICAC with the commissioner indicating no adverse finding is likely against him. Fair and balanced coverage?”

Yes, Williamson was national president of the ALP in 2009-10 and held other roles within the ALP and the ACTU (he seems to have been vice-president of Unions NSW, for the record) — so he was more than just a HSU chief. And yes, he was national ALP president for some of the time he was receiving fraudulent payments. So yes, that probably should be mentioned. This ABC story from Friday mentions the ALP links, as does this story from The Australian (of course). This SMH story does not. We’re not sure it’s a pro-Labor conspiracy, but if you didn’t know about Williamson’s role at the ALP, you do now.

Autumn sounds. Ah, autumn — the leaves turning golden, the smoke in the air, the chill in the dawn, and the annoying roar of leaf blowers destroying the serenity. Some of our most-respected reporters at Canberra’s Parliament House indulged in leaf blower rage this morning — this is The Australian’s David Crowe and Fairfax’s James Massola:

Is it really so hard for council workers to use a broom, or, as plan B, let the leaves stay on the ground? We’re interested in what our readers think about leaf blowers — post your view in our comments thread online. If there’s sufficient rage we’ll consider a petition up on change.org. Take that, world!

*Heard anything that might interest Crikey? Send your tips to boss@crikey.com.au or use our guaranteed anonymous form

8
  • 1
    Posted Monday, 31 March 2014 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    The Sports Party’s really stood in some kangaroo poo now hasn’t it?

  • 2
    Deipnosoph
    Posted Monday, 31 March 2014 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    I detest leaf blowers. I’d even support a hike in petrol prices to make their use uneconomic. It’s going to happen someday anyway. (But then I guess there will be renewable energy-powered battery leaf blowers by then, and my main opposition will be the noise).

    I think that, at least in Hyde Park Sydney, the many leaves plus rain equals slippery pathways, and hence large potential public liability. I still think that sweeping is in order.

  • 3
    stuart richardson
    Posted Monday, 31 March 2014 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    Re: Leaf blowers. In the cold light of day, is there even ONE logical reason to use one of these abominations? Petition! a great idea, we could be the first developed nation to show that we are smarter than the marketing geniuses, post the “Great Hoodwinking”.
    Reasons not to use a leaf blower: They don’t actually accomplish the task they are designed for? They just move a perceived problem from one location to another, a couple of meters away.
    The investment of time and energy (when not combined with collection of said leaves, as is most often the case) compared to outcome, read: leaf free real estate, is disproportionate
    in the extreme.
    They are robbing the user of health giving exercise.
    They are burning fossil fuels.
    They are antisocial.
    I spoke to a council worker who started to blow by my morning coffee shop, he saw reason and took up the ancient art of broom pushing. Win Win.

  • 4
    Dylan
    Posted Monday, 31 March 2014 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Leafblowers are a wonderful example of the intersection between technology and annoyance that has a compelling economic benefit.

    Perhaps the reporter from The Australian could take issue with his local council and have them banned? Unfortunately this would seem a little too much like nanny state interventionism though, and I agree it’s better to leave technology free to do what it needs to, rather than let some pesky “government” do something to improve the quality of life for its voters.

  • 5
    Michael Hutchison
    Posted Monday, 31 March 2014 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    Leaf blowers – aka dust raisers – are, incredibly, taking on the broom; but at what cost? Environmentally they must be on top of the bad list and socially seem to – anti-socially – move one’s problem to one’s neighbour’s problem. Please bring back the leaf burn with its lovely autumn ambience and mildly intoxicating aromas.

  • 6
    Matt Hardin
    Posted Monday, 31 March 2014 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    I’m against the leaf blowers in principle and would sign the petition but I did use one once and it was kinda fun.

  • 7
    Chris Hartwell
    Posted Monday, 31 March 2014 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    … Couldn’t they just use a leaf-vacuum instead?

  • 8
    Peter McArdle
    Posted Monday, 31 March 2014 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

    Leaf-blowers - “how’s the serenity?”.
    So a couple of journos don’t like leaf blowers disturbing their contemplation of serious matters. Would they prefer teams of serfs with (very quiet) brooms or the leaf blower at another time when they are not around (how is 2am fellas?).
    I don’t like noisy traffic or jet aircraft overhead but they are part of the modern world in which we live, as are leaf blowers. Suck it up fellas, it is the 21st century.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...