Crikey readers talk asylum seekers on Manus Island, the reality for Australian farmers, the gender pay gap and why Wills and Kate might be doing our air force a favour.
Up in the air with the royals
Tom Torday, a former flight lieutenant, writes: Re. “Royal rates: what you’ll pay for Will and Kate’s Aussie adventure” (Friday). I am as republican as the next leftie, but it should be remarked that RAAF units, such as the VIP Flight, must do a minimum hours per month in the air. The royal flights will count towards this and are therefore not quite as extravagant as they are made out!
The point that should be made is not that “women choose lower paid fields to work in”. The point is that these fields are lower paid because they were traditionally women’s work. Traditional “female” jobs have always been valued less than those dominated by men.
Job for job, there may be some consistency in pay, but until we start to value the different but critical skills that women bring into the workforce, we will have a very real gender pay gap.
The majority of trains of prisoners to Belsen were late in the war and were treated as the lowest priority on the German railway network, being parked whenever it was not convenient for the train to use the rail lines, sometimes for days without food or water. That will have made their arrival at Belsen quite unpredictable. “As predictable as … the arrival of the trains at Belsen” is pretty unpredictable. Linking these atrocities to the cruelty on Manus Island grossly underplays the immense Nazi evil.
In 1941-42 about 3 million Soviet prisoners of war were taken in eight months; 2.8 million of them died in German custody in that period. At Belsen, 20,000 Soviet prisoners of war and 50,000 other people died. Some 14,000 of them died after being liberated, out of the about 53,000 alive at liberation.
For farmers, playing field is never level
Shirley Colless writes: Re. “For farmers, drought not the most dangerous predator on the horizon” (Friday). It does not seem to matter whether Australian farmers are trying to deal with a Labor or a Coalition government, they keep being told there are level playing fields out there, no matter whether they are growing/manufacturing food for consumption in Australia or for export overseas. This attitude of successive governments is led by their respective noses by the Milton Friedman-obsessed Productivity Commission.
Australian farmers have know for decades that the US subsidises its farmers — yet ours refuses to do so. That fresh produce and manufactured food items can be brought into Australia, regardless of the cost of transport, to undercut the price of local produce and manufactured items says to me that there has to be a subsidy somewhere. If this keeps going, aided and abetted by the economic mantra of successive governments, do we risk a future where our food producers, of meat, fruit, vegetables, whether fresh or manufactured, go under and we are left at the mercy, political and economic, of transnational food controllers and other governments who are quite happy not to provide level playing fields on which our food producers can compete?