tip off

Crikey says: governments bet on Packer — every time

We compiled the hit list of government asset sales — now the experts weigh in. How Chris Christie’s downfall was a shining moment for journalism. The Aboriginal activist who made friends with his spies. Three years on from the Arab Spring, where are we? Some advice to Tony Abbott from an old school pal. And the Golden Globes: Hollywood’s biggest con.

The Victorian government wasn’t about to make James Packer pay without talking to him first. When Treasurer Michael O’Brien announced a pokies levy to prop up government coffers in December, as the Herald Sun reports today, the government said it was “subject to the satisfactory conclusion of negotiations and mutual agreement between the Victorian government and Crown to establish an outcome that delivers real value for both parties”.

Now the government reportedly knows what Packer wants in return: tax breaks for its high-roller tables and an extension of its gaming licence for 99 years.

Talk about an ambit claim. But don’t for a moment think the government will laugh it away like you might expect.

Packer has state governments wrapped around his finger. The New South Wales government just awarded him a prime harbour-side spot and a second Sydney gaming licence to move in. The Queensland government is wooing him for more casinos up and down the coast. And the Victorian government is more than happy to sit down and nut out a deal in Crown’s favour. As the Hun reports:

The Herald Sun has learnt that the qualification had to be inserted at the last minute, and that the negotiation over the levy was added to broader discussions about Crown’s operations.

It is understood Crown was satisfied with the last-minute inclusion of the clause, and is adamant the levy will not go ahead unless both parties come to an arrangement.”

Reckon the government, as addicted to gaming tax revenue as problem gamblers are to the pokies, would be as conciliatory to any other business or industry sector? Don’t bet on it.

4
  • 1
    AR
    Posted Tuesday, 14 January 2014 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Salutary to recall the knots in which the Gillard gov tied itself when it rejected, out of hand, Wilkies’ initial, simple, stroke of the pen/flick of the screwdriver solution for pokie addiction - MAXIMUM $1 bet - so that the deluded & addicted could spend hours but, relatively, little money at the chosen ‘fun’.
    The shameful unorstaylun ad attacks and the ever more complex & unworkable & idiotic attempts to square the circle - stop players pissing their money away & maintain club coffers - were doomed from the outset.
    As are any attempts to wean state governments from the financial fix casinos provide.
    It’s one thing to say that gambling is a tax on the stupid but unfortunately the stupid too often have children and other dependents.

  • 2
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 14 January 2014 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    It’s all about “The Law of Avarices”?

  • 3
    Zeke
    Posted Tuesday, 14 January 2014 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    I’m sure criminals wishing to launder their money at Packer’s gambling tables will be very happy.

  • 4
    zut alors
    Posted Tuesday, 14 January 2014 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    Packer must find this amusing: he simply asks and governments promptly bend over.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...