tip off

Pyne’s culture warriors: curriculum reviewers ‘lack credibility’

Christopher Pyne has charged Kevin Donnelly and Ken Wiltshire — harsh critics of the national curriculum — to ferret out “bias” in classrooms. Their appointments have come under close scrutiny.

As the Abbott government launches a sweeping review into the new national curriculum, the country’s curriculum chief has rejected claims that a partisan progressive agenda is being foisted on students.

And the lead writer of the national history curriculum has blasted Education Minister Christopher Pyne’s choice of reviewers, saying they lack credibility and expertise in the area.

Pyne announced this morning that two of the curriculum’s harshest critics — education consultant Kevin Donnelly and Queensland University public administration professor Ken Wiltshire — will review the national curriculum. Pyne says a review is needed to ensure the curriculum is “balanced in its content, free of partisan bias and deals with real-world issues”.

Historian Stuart Macintyre, lead author of the national history curriculum, told Crikey he was alarmed by Pyne’s appointments. ”I don’t think Kevin Donnelly has any credibility at all,” he said. “The book he wrote, Dumbing Down, is almost illiterate — it shows a deplorable lack of understanding of education and curriculum.”

Macintyre says he’s also concerned that Donnelly — a former chief of staff to Liberal MP Kevin Andrews — has been tasked with ensuring the curriculum is free of partisan bias. Regarding Wiltshire, Macintyre says he is not regarded as an expert on school curricula (Wiltshire, it should be noted, chaired a review of the Queensland school curriculum for the Goss Labor government).

Christopher Pyne has been banging this drum for several years — I think he believes there is political mileage in reigniting the culture wars,” Macintyre said.

Barry McGaw, chair of the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), strongly defended the national curriculum this morning, saying it has been subject to years of rigorous debate and review. National curricula for English, maths, science and history up to year 10 have been agreed by all state and territory ministers and will begin being implemented in NSW this year.

Asked whether it’s fair for critics to assert, as Donnelly has, that the national curriculum was mandating a “cultural Left” agenda for schools, McGaw told Crikey: “No, I don’t think it’s fair. For example, there has been a lot of misrepresentation of the role of cross-curriculum priorities [Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander history and culture, engagement with Asia and sustainability] — including by Judith Sloan on Radio National this morning.”

McGaw says these areas will only be addressed where relevant and barely covered, if at all, in courses such as mathematics. And there has been a strong back-to-basics approach to English. “In English we have reinstated a stronger emphasis on grammar and other aspects of language — stronger than currently exists in most state curricula,” he said.

McGaw says Donnelly and Wiltshire are both competent and the ACARA will consider their recommendations. “You can always benefit from review,” he said.

Stuart Macintyre, who has long opposed conservative historians in the so-called “history wars”, predicts the government will have “enormous difficulties” implementing curriculum changes as further tinkering is likely to be resisted by state governments.

The ACARA used a consultation process that was almost interminable,” he said. “Most of them would say, ‘go away — we’ve spent years getting this right and now you want to go and upset it’ … All [Pyne] has to force their hand is the traditional funding blackmail card, but he has already criticised federal command and control of education,” Macintyre said.

Macintyre also disagrees with claims made by Pyne this morning that there is not enough focus on Anzac Day in the curriculum. “There is a great slab on Anzac already — too much in my view,” he said.

Pyne defended his appointments this morning, saying:

It’s not possible to appoint anybody to review the national curriculum who doesn’t have a view on education. The important point is to appoint people who are going to bring an intelligent and considered approach to the review, and both Kevin and Ken have a long history and experience in education.”

Kevin Donnelly, head of the Education Standards Institute, defended his track record, telling Crikey: “There are more important issues at stake than personal vitriol. The reality is I taught for 18 years and have postgraduate qualifications — including a masters and PhD — focussing on curriculum. I’m eminently qualified to do this job.”

When asked if he is currently a member of the Liberal Party, Donnelly said: “I am a member of lots of groups … Sorry, I don’t think that is relevant.”

Crikey also contacted Ken Wiltshire this morning but didn’t receive a response before deadline; we’ll add any comment as it is received.

28
  • 1
    Interrobanging On
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    Ugly. Announce a review then stack it with pre-declared critics. Only one outcome is possible. The fact the curricula have been accepted by all states and territories is irrelevant.

    Then have the bare-faced gall to say it is to remove ‘bias’. It might remove ‘bias’ as maggot-brained right wingers perceive it, but it is solely to replace it with their own bias. Expect a strong ‘Whitewash’ view of history.

    It is a good career move to be a friend of the Liberal Party when writing on the Drum or wherever. Gets you plum gigs with this shameless and cynical mob.

  • 2
    Migraine
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    Among the many many things I find disturbing about this: a Minister of the Crown providing the justification for an important announcement via a newspaper opinion piece - as an exclusive - which is locked behind a paywall. Basic accountability would suggest making the piece as widely accessible as possible. Besides - a column to the 37 crusty gentlemen who still read the Oz? Preaching to the choir …

  • 3
    lloydois
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Couldn’t agree more migraine but then as we all know this is not a government that has any concern for the majority of Australians. It’s just a bunch of sad old ideologues playing out culture wars most of us moved beyond some time ago.

    The idea of Kevin Donnelly taking the partisan out of anything is as laughable as Christopher Pyne showing competence at anything he does.

  • 4
    Scott Grant
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    Matthew, you are tasked to stay behind after class and write 500 times “I will not use TASK as a verb”.

  • 5
    klewso
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    We’ve got Rupert rewriting history, in the media, now Pyne wants to “redecorate” our education system to reflect his personal opinions?

  • 6
    leon knight
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    It may take a little while to repair the education system after this clown has finished meddling with it - although basically teachers will continue to do a good job in spite of hare-brained ideas being foisted on them from on high.
    There is a disturbing religious agenda behind all this, as well as the usual LNP paranoia about left-wing bias.
    I was astounded that Pyne could hold down his job as manager of opposition business (even more that Abbott chose him for that task), but he is way out of his depth now. Dog help us……

  • 7
    Barking
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    But the real point is this: The country is hurtling toward some serious economic quicksand and these “adults-in-charge” are amusing themselves with culture war frivolities? Dog help us indeed!

  • 8
    Interrobanging On
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 5:36 pm | Permalink

    Barking,

    Your mistake is thinking that winning elections and gaining power is about good governance when it is really about using the position for ideological battling and social engineering…so St Christopher teaches us.

    Scott, I agree…at the risk of sounding like a codger calling for education to be just like the good old days when men were men, sheep and women were nervous and an Indigenous Australian was a bloody boong.

    Add ‘disconnect’ as a noun too. It’s a bit odd (and definitely unthinking) the way nouns are becoming verbs and verbs becoming nouns for no good reason.

    Anyone using ‘around’ to mean ‘about’ should do lines as well. I am annoyed around people’s use of around instead of about when talking around something.

    On the misuse of words The Guardian today has a video caption making reference to ‘idol curiosity’. Of course, they really mean ‘idyll curiosity’.

  • 9
    klewso
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Abbott was Howard’s Leader of the House.
    A case of a job, for which “…… Those with talent need not apply!”?

  • 10
    The Pav
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

    Of course we will give you a fair trial before we shoot you

  • 11
    AR
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    Where is keith Windshuttle when he is needed to give lessons on historical troofiness?

  • 12
    Barking
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for straightening me out on that, Interro. Thought I was missing something, but you’re right. Of course, Rundle nailed it today on that score too: Labor currently have no interest in good governance either.

  • 13
    Malcolm Street
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    leon knight - yes, interesting that the Catholic schools have come out in favour.

  • 14
    colin skene
    Posted Friday, 10 January 2014 at 7:24 pm | Permalink

    I think this government will rival the McMahon government as the greatest joke in political history. What are Christopher Pyne’s credentials to determine whether a review of curriculum is required? And, where is Tony Abbott on all of this? Ideology has taken over from any reasoned sort of sensible government strategy. I cannot believe how appalling they are. It just needs Shorten and Labor to highlight the plethora of policy back-flips, broken promises and down right arrogance and this mob will be out of office for a decade, It just goes to show how a strategy of “opposing for opposing’s sake:, given air by a biased media can lead to this situation. But…we’re not that stupid, and this rabble will be exposed for all that they are; a complete basket case of incompetent fools.

  • 15
    klewso
    Posted Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 12:11 am | Permalink

    Where’s Abbott?
    As with his “education unity ticket with Labor” - he’s blown up his Christopher Pyne doll, then let him go.

  • 16
    CML
    Posted Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 12:24 am | Permalink

    Good on ya, Colin! Over at Guy Rundle’s article the bloggers have written off Labor only four months into opposition!!
    However, I think you are correct. If the rAbbott and his motley crew continue with their outrageous stuff-ups, the proverbial ‘drover’s dog’ could win in 2016.
    I come from Adelaide - Pyne is a joke around here to most people with an ounce of intelligence. Unfortunately, he represents the ‘pukka’ part of town, where people vote Liberal regardless of who they might elect. Not much brain power over there, it seems. They really do deserve each other!

  • 17
    drmick
    Posted Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 11:04 am | Permalink

    This another disgrace this untalented, clueless mincing moron has stampeded into. How many times will he have to prove himself the biggest thickhead in the world before they displace Tony and give this poonce the top job? Or are poncey poodle and the corgi going to have to draw straws? Worst Government ever.

  • 18
    Electric Lardyland
    Posted Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 11:12 am | Permalink

    Really, it is a strange, self perpetuating circus: right wing ideologue comes up with a ridiculous opinion or plain dumb idea, somebody has the good sense to criticise that idea or form a more sensible alternative plan…et voila, the poor downtrodden soul is now a victim of that nasty bias.
    Of course, the real bias may have been the Howard government funding model that relentlessly favoured the wealthiest schools.

  • 19
    Tom Jones
    Posted Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Christopher Pyne did use statistics over ten years to say that education is failing Electric Ladyland - about the length of time needed for a funding model to show results. Pyne also says that money isn’t the answer but watch more of it go to private schools under his reign. Of course the fact that the new curriculum has not yet started will have nothing to do with its failure.
    However what all despotic regimes like is control of what is taught to the children. Perhaps as part of the curriculum review we should make sure the little cherubs study Mein Kampf and Mao’s Little Red Book.
    I do notice that the review team is jobs for the boys with no woman deemed good enough and certainly no-one from a non Anglo background either. So nice little earner for those who know what they have to write and not only that, they are so clever that they will have it in place within 12 months including materials. Fantastic.

  • 20
    Roy Inglis
    Posted Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    My middle position is your extremism.

    The middle ground in Australian politics is an ever narrower place. Despite the mainstream lefts migration to the right, there will soon be so little ground that what remains will be a knifes edge.

  • 21
    Lasso
    Posted Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    Here we go, “Inventing Australia” all over again. Prepare the whitewash will you, this narrow-minded country is apparently becoming a little too progressive for a conservative elitist agenda…

  • 22
    shaun wilby
    Posted Sunday, 12 January 2014 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    Where was this outrage and skepticism from the left when Qld Labor appointed Wiltshire to review their curriculum?

  • 23
    burninglog
    Posted Monday, 13 January 2014 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    have spent the last year working with colleagues on the new Australian Curriculum in history.

    Will all that work be for nothing?

    When it involves Pyne, the answer is “Probably”.

  • 24
    Hannah Wills
    Posted Monday, 13 January 2014 at 1:28 pm | Permalink

    Macintyre also disagrees with claims made by Pyne this morning that there is not enough focus on Anzac Day in the curriculum. “There is a great slab on Anzac already — too much in my view,” he said.

    Cannot even deal with this.

  • 25
    Margaret Ludowyk
    Posted Monday, 13 January 2014 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    Donnelly has no credibility as an ‘education expert’. He is mainly known for his rantings in support of more funding for private schools. And why have an English teacher only, surely you’d want people from all study areas. Donnelly’s Education Standards Institutes is simply the name of his one man consulting business At least Wiltshire has some education expertise, even if a Liberal party supporter.

  • 26
    Itsarort
    Posted Tuesday, 14 January 2014 at 12:04 am | Permalink

    Dear Mr Pyne,
    I promise not to be bias with my equations and what ever I do to the Left, I will do exactly the same to the Right. However, if my students ask me questions about mathematicians like Bertrand Russell or Albert Einstein, I will have to tell the truth and say that they were humanitarian pacifists who would almost certainly not agree to ‘turn back the boats’. Hmm, and I don’t think Jesus would’ve either - assuming that he existed of course…

  • 27
    Steven Grant Haby
    Posted Tuesday, 14 January 2014 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    Donnelly also has some connections with the IPA so no surprise there. It astounds me for something as important as a review to potentially influence educational outcomes for future students then you would want some proven heavy hitters in education at all levels to be involved. Why hasn’t the Australian Council for Educational Research or Education Services Australia (formerley Curriculum Corporation) being given an opportunity or even some boffins from university and teaching associations e.g. History Teachers Association of Australia etc. Donnelly and Wiltshire were chosen because Pyne knows that they will publish recommendations that are favourable to the current government’s ideological viewpoint. Pyne is clearly incomptent and way out of his depth. How long will it be before he becomes too much of a liability and Abbott dumps him (probably not too long after the SA election p’raps)

  • 28
    Centaur
    Posted Monday, 3 February 2014 at 8:27 am | Permalink

    So I have been googling for days and cannot locate where we can make submissions to this “inquiry”. Or is it just a two ma job?

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...