Dear creator of Aussie TV soap: it’s not snobbery if your show is crap
Nov 04, 2013 12:48PM |EMAIL|PRINT
Too much candour can be a dangerous thing, or at least terribly embarrassing. Mumbrella reports the comments of Seven network script executive Bevan Lee on a panel at a Google event in Sydney, and they’re as hilariously oblivious as you might expect from a network executive:
“What I see as one of the biggest problems is when I hear things about facilitating the audience talking to each other throughout the program. It makes my blood run cold, because there is a creator, and you owe him the duty of coming to his creativity, and your choice is to like it or not like it.”
He pointed to the finale of hit US drama Dexter, where some of the audience complained they did not get the ending they wanted. “What the audience seems to want to do with this new media is hijack the creator,” he added.
“My response was, ‘bugger you’. You came with the creator, you stayed with him right to the end and even if you didn’t like it, he didn’t let you down, you let him down by not trying to come with him.”
Oh boy. And there’s more:
On people wanting to make shows without having “paid their dues” in the industry he pointed to the example of Lena Dunham’s acclaimed series Girls, saying: “In Girls, for every one scene that I think works, I see three scenes that I think would be better if she had written them 10 years down the track. That is what I fear of the loss of the concept of craft skills.”
But my favourite line, the one that completely destroys any legitimacy held by his previous comments, is this one:
“I do not write stuff I watch, I write stuff because it’s what comes out of [me] for a broad audience. I’m good at what I do because I instinctively stay with my roots and I hope the new media does not give rise to an elitist snobbery.”
So, to wit: “I hope new media doesn’t create some kind of snobbery because maybe then people will stop watching the bland, generic pap I churn out for the masses. What? Oh, I don’t watch the kind of thing I write either. What a ludicrous proposition! Oh, Jeeves dear, would you be so kind as to give the dog another bowl of Dom Perignon?”
Let’s go from the start. Lee seems to think audiences are wrong for thinking something is bad. The universally negative reaction of people to the insipid ending of Dexter is wrong because the audiences weren’t willing to go along with what the creator wanted. They put in seven seasons and committed hours and hours to the show, and somehow they’re in the wrong for hating an ending that failed to close the series’ central plot thread and used a string of idiotic narrative contrivances in order to end on an ambiguous note the show never earned. But screw you, audience, you let the creator down “by not trying to come with him”.
Aside from the spurious privileging of authorial intent, Lee’s insistence that social media is ruining everything is an embarrassing death rattle from an old media. TV networks are desperate to capture the attention of social media users — they’re a largely young market whose willingness to engage with TV on multiple levels shows a monetisable dedication that functions as secondary marketing.
I guess it makes sense that Lee wouldn’t much care for the likes of Facebook and Twitter, though. His shows — Packed to the Rafters, Home & Away, Marshall Law, City Homicide — are the kind of distinctive, auteurist works that defy social media engagement. Or maybe they’re just mediocre soaps and procedurals with completely sanded edges. Or maybe it’s because Rebecca Gibney looking bemusedly at Erik Thomson for the eighth time an episode because their rafters are just SO PACKED simply isn’t hashtaggable material?
Lee’s citation of Girls is a bizarre one; its writer-director-creator-star Lena Dunham had made a well-received independent feature film before she landed her show at HBO, which has since been praised and rewarded with Emmys and become something of a cultural phenomenon. Funnily, Girls’ broadcast ratings are quite low but it has significant success on — you guessed it — new media such as streaming platforms and iTunes. It’s fine if he thinks there are aspects of Girls that don’t work — I’d agree with him there, particularly in its second season. But to put it down to Dunham’s youth and supposed ineptitude is unfair, and seems to be a pretty obvious extension of the oft-posited nepotism argument against Dunham. Perhaps he would have a point if Dunham were the rule and not an exception.
Lee’s issues with “niche programming” such as The Walking Dead (yeah, super niche dude, what with its 16 million viewers and fourth season premiere becoming the most-watched in US cable TV history) and Breaking Bad (a ratings hit in its final season) seem to be that people watching high-profile international television decreases the likelihood of people watching his less adventurous shows. New media has made great TV more accessible than ever, so of course the network script executive of an older-skewing network like Seven would be fearful of change.