tip off

Scott Morrison and his marionette set sail for secrecy

The Coalition’s disdain for facts will eventually come to hurt them, especially if they run away from transparency — as they’ve done with asylum seeker arrivals.

The “shipping news”, Immigration Minister Scott Morrison called it yesterday, in seeking to dismiss transparency about the arrival of boats carrying asylum seekers. Having quickly worked out, as news organisations and social media switched to directly sourcing information from people on Christmas Island, that his attempt to blockade all information about arriving boats would fail, Morrison had reluctantly decided a weekly “briefing” on his “Operation Sovereign Borders” confection would be necessary.

How real-time transparency about boat arrivals, as practised by Labor, somehow gave people smugglers an advantage that weekly briefings did not, he struggled to explain. When pressed on whose idea weekly briefings were, and other matters around transparency, Angus Campbell, the be-uniformed marionette cast as the lead performer in the Coalition’s refugees-as-military-problem drama, similarly struggled. His mouth opened, incoherent verbiage poured out, his mouth closed. They could at least have given their leading man some media training.

We’re going to operate the operation Operation Sovereign Borders,” Morrison added helpfully after one particularly unintelligible Campbell answer.

And, indeed, the word “operate” was on high-rotation yesterday, because that’s the rationale for the government’s lack of transparency; Morrison went so far as to say they wouldn’t even reveal whether they had succeeded or failed in “turning back the boats” for “operational reasons”. “Operational reasons” is what security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies hide behind to avoid public scrutiny: providing anything other than the vaguest information might harm their operations — indeed, as Morrison and Campbell hinted yesterday, place Australian personnel in danger.

Labor of course wasn’t averse to exploiting national security for its own ends. Remember the unfortunate Mark Dreyfus using national security to justify continuing to advertise the government’s PNG solution into the caretaker period? Dreyfus actually linked saving lives to continuing the domestic PNG advertising campaign, insisting it was a “national security matter”.

Transparency as threat; an old, old tune.

Being unbound by facts is a joyous feeling, and Abbott gloried in the freedom, and his colleagues along with him.”

It’s an early theme of this government, which publicly mulled delaying MYEFO into the New Year (NYE-FO?) so as not to frighten consumers with more bad budget news. Your precious budget transparency might cost jobs, see. The Climate Commission, intended to provide independent and reliable information on climate change, will be shuttered.

This, like the dearth of women in cabinet, is the Coalition governing consistent with how it conducted itself in opposition. The Abbott-model opposition regarded facts as wholly dispensable in its campaign against Labor — to be embraced wholeheartedly if they assisted in the task of attacking Labor (as Morrison did with boat arrival numbers), to be ignored or invented if not. The mere truth or falsity of a claim advanced by the Coalition was irrelevant; as Abbott himself noted in 2010, his own words couldn’t be believed; you had to get it from him in written form, although that proved no greater a guarantee of truth.

Being unbound by facts is a joyous feeling, and Abbott gloried in the freedom, and his colleagues along with him. Sooner or later, however, it comes with a price — losing your capacity to argue effectively. Rather than use its arrival in government to shed its disdain for facts, the Coalition appears to be going further in rejecting them. The Coalition is thus slowly doing to itself what Labor did to itself so effectively — let its communication skills atrophy, so that the party of Hawke and Keating transformed into the party of Rudd.

There’s another problem that arises when you throw blankets like “operational matters” and “national security” over transparency and accountability. The greater the secrecy in which policies are implemented, money spent and government personnel operate, the more likely abuses, incompetence and corruption are to occur, with officials and their political masters less concerned about the threat of public scrutiny.

Whether or not Morrison and his colleagues are being smart, being politically savvy, in invoking dire consequences as an excuse for reducing transparency, in the long-run a more secret government is a less effective one.

30
  • 1
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    Operation Ostrich”?

  • 2
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    This was the game that so suited the Coal-ition - but now they’re the homies, so they want to move the goal posts?

  • 3
    ian kemp
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    When was the last time a major country appointed a senior military figure tasked with persecuting refugees? Please tell me it’s not just nazi germany and us?

  • 4
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    It’s looking more like an episode of Thunderbirds every day? This is the one where Scott Tracy is overtaken by extraterrestrial intelligence.

  • 5
    Interrobanging On
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    operate the operation Operation…” Did he really say that? What a suppository of wisdom Mr Morrison is.

    …the party of Hawke and Keating transformed into the party of Rudd.” Good line, that one.

    No-one should be surprised that the new government will aim for secrecy and deceit and not only on this issue. It is in their DNA. And it worked with the Children Overboard lies in 2001 and I am sure they haven’t forgotten that.

    And now there is the real risk of failure they have to cover up. This is already unraveling, as the people on Christmas Island will let people know about arrivals.

    And even the people smugglers are sneering at the ‘operate the operation’ rationale for secrecy.

    But will the sheeple believe them…no doubt too many will.

  • 6
    ben
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    A more secret govt is also an offensive one; an insult to the people they serve.

    Why don’t media interviewers not simply ask Abbott each time to write down his answers?

  • 7
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    How can you trust what he dedicates to writing?
    In that interview he said not to put too much faith in whatever he says - then he “said” that what he writes is more dependable?
    He’s every inch the political opportunist as his master, “honest” John Howard.

  • 8
    DiddyWrote
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    This is a very bad start indeed. The lesson Abbott and the rest of the Coalition have learnt from opposition is that,for them, there are no negative consequences for telling falsehoods and ignoring facts.
    They appear to quite happy to carry this attitude on into government.

    It’s like Karl Rove’s statement about the Bush presidency

    when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out.”

    And we know how well that turned out

  • 9
    Stevo the Working Twistie
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    They know they can’t possibly win the Culture Wars, the History Wars, the War on Drugs, the War on Terrorism or even the Cola Wars, so now bring on the Information Wars. What we don’t know might hurt us, but at least we won’t know it is hurting us. Oh, and no protesting either, you bloody anarchists.

  • 10
    shepherdmarilyn
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    Maybe the lazy media might remember they are supposed to investigate, I could not work out why the arrival of refugees by sea had to be announced when 6 million other people arriving were not.

  • 11
    bushby jane
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    The whole and only point of this secrecy is to keep the issue off the front page, so the dills who read Murdoch press will believe that the ‘boats problem’ has been solved. Hopefully the Fairfax press will pick up on it- just think of the ‘exclusives’!

  • 12
    Saugoof
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    As the late, great, Joe Bageant said, “It doesn’t matter whether what you say is true, it just has to ‘feel’ like it’s true”.

    Imagine the News Ltd. outrage if Labor had done that at some stage during the last three years.

  • 13
    Pedantic, Balwyn
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    And this just the start. As the going gets tough, for example our neighbours seriously laying into Abbott’s attack on their sovereignty, there will be less and less information made public. And the reality is that few care about what happens overseas amongst the “darkies”, so the Coalition will continue to dissemble and obfuscate to their hearts content in the knowledge that it will not lose them any votes.

  • 14
    The Pav
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    This is a policy of running Austrlaia as “Secret Mens Business’

    Abbotts wants to be trusted yet won’t even trust the Australian people with the information…….probably as a function of realising how stupid so many were for voting for him.

    Cowardice and secrecy will be matched with bullying and brutality

  • 15
    Andrew Bartlett
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    This is also about making it easier to turn the people around, even if they can’t turn the boats back. The previous Govt already did it by ‘screening out’ people so they never get to lodge a refugee claim (& thus never have it assessed).

    This will be even easier to do if no one knows that people have arrived in the first place.

    It won’t mean fewer boats, but it will enable them to claim that more people are being sent back. (The fact that this means some people will be sent back to danger or death is obviously not of any concern - after all, it’s something we’ve already done from time to time, so what’s a few more deaths to add to the list)

  • 16
    shepherdmarilyn
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    Andrew is right, why Australia has decided that victims of wars we started, persecution and torture are the worst criminals on the planet if they dare to come and seek our protection under the law is beyond me but the rancid, racist media have been zero help.

  • 17
    Bill Harrower
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Morrison and Angus Campbell, aka the Piranha Brothers, operating their “other operation”.

    Horowitz

  • 18
    @chrispydog
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    DiddyWrote, thanks for quoting that, it’s been playing in my head for the last few weeks.

    Is there a chance some “unknown unknowns” are going to sneak up on them?

    No chance they won’t, really.

  • 19
    Liamj
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 6:19 pm | Permalink

    Its obvious where Abbott is getting his inspiration - making the truth illegal or at least inaccessible is traditional catholic practice.

  • 20
    @chrispydog
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    Actually Liamj, it’s also the modus operandi of all extreme totalitarian regimes, so a lot in common with the Roman Mafia, eh?

    Abbott’s crew are looking a lot like Tea Party types who have no use for truth or facts, and like to wave around the US Constitution while having hardly a clue what it actually means.

    One man’s freedom is another man’s right to wear a brown shirt and kick folks around. It’s important we don’t drift to the latter.

  • 21
    AR
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 9:29 pm | Permalink

    The greater the secrecy…the more likely abuses, incompetence and corruption are to occur, with officials and their political masters less concerned about the threat of public scrutiny..
    Which is precisely why no government will abolish s70,(i) &(ii)of the Crime Act. As MrsT said, in another context, “the oxygen of publicity…is the best disinfectant.”

  • 22
    zut alors
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    If sufficient mischievous citizens manufacture & circulate many rumours of boat arrivals the nation’s perception will be that there’s an increase in refugees. Plenty more than under the Rudd/Gillard govts.

    Panic in the streets, red faces in the govt…and Morrison will be forced to hose it all down by giving accurate information about his operation to operate Operation Sovereign Borders.

    What an operator.

  • 23
    Frank Birchall
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 10:10 pm | Permalink

    Officers of our armed services should have united to refuse the position taken by Angus Campbell. It is demeaning to him, the Army and the other services to accept ‘operational’ responsibility for such a degrading task as confronting refugee families on unsafe boats hoping for a better life in Australia. It has besmirched the honour and history of our proud Army, Navy and Air Force whose job it is to defend the country against armed, hostile invaders.

  • 24
    michael crook
    Posted Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    lord save us from Christians who hate.

  • 25
    klewso
    Posted Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 6:23 am | Permalink

    Bad as rabid Muslims.

  • 26
    MJPC
    Posted Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 7:25 am | Permalink

    Is it a bit early for those who didn’t vote for these idiots to now say that “we warned you”?
    I am waiting for the first press conferences where our new PM starts to stutter, should be a few of them with policies like this disaster.

  • 27
    Redsunderbeds
    Posted Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    Morrison inspired by fellow right wing nut, Rumsfeld…
    There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don’t know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don’t know we don’t know.
    With an emphasis on the last sentence to keep the great unwashed ignorant.

  • 28
    Rubio Diego
    Posted Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 3:18 pm | Permalink

    I like your idea zut alors. We could resurrect the big billboard and set the numbers to - Since September 8 there have been 24 boats carrying 1323 refugees intercepted. Zero boats turned back. So the suppository of all wisdom becomes the Butt of all jokes!

  • 29
    Edward James
    Posted Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    Now the LNP are in it is time to serve them up the way we served up Labor. Now there in they can’t claim they can’t act because they are not in government. Edward James

  • 30
    Hamis Hill
    Posted Thursday, 26 September 2013 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    Does the Coalition really need Murdoch Men , Abbott and Morrison anymore?
    what authority do either have which wasn’t granted by Murdoch and his near media monopoly.
    Murdoch is on his way out, his newspapers are crumbling, and the conservatives do not need him or his anointed any more.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...