tip off

Labor bloodletting continues over Kevin Rudd legacy

Labor frontbencher Craig Emerson’s attempt to blacken Kevin Rudd’s name has met with savage criticism from some sitting Labor MPs.

Kevin Rudd

Key Kevin Rudd lieutenants have rounded on former frontbencher Craig Emerson’s slapdown of the Honourable Member for Griffith, telling Crikey the two-time PM saved the party from electoral oblivion and should be respected.

Emerson, Julia Gillard’s former partner, told the ABC last night that Rudd should quit politics for good after Labor’s defeat in Saturday’s election: “Anyone … who is so hell-bent on revenge, who is so destructive, as to depress the Labor vote in the 2010 election shouldn’t be rewarded for that sort of behaviour,” Emerson said.

He came back as prime minister, the election was a disaster for Labor and Kevin Rudd’s continuing presence in the parliamentary Labor Party will see him do what he has always done, and that is willingly, wilfully, recklessly, destabilise Labor leaders.”

The Whyalla Wipe Out performer was responding to a confirmation from Victorian ALP Senator Kim Carr that Rudd would see out his three-year term as a federal MP.

NSW Senator and former parliamentary secretary for homelessness Doug Cameron hit back at Emerson this morning, telling Crikey he was wrong and Rudd critics were intent on prosecuting personal grudges and conspiracy theories. “This lack of respect and personal animosity and lack of courage from some people that didn’t take these issues up with Kevin Rudd when they were in senior ministerial positions just leaves me cold,” he said.

I take the view that we need to move on from this. And the issue for us is to become a strong effective opposition and all my energies are about that and not relieving some personal slight or some conspiracy theory from the past.”

If a byelection were held in Griffith tomorrow, the Labor candidate would likely lose to popular LNP candidate Bill Glasson, further reducing the party’s representation when every seat will be crucial in the lead-up to the 2016 election.

Cameron said a return to the polls in Griffith so soon after the election would be a ridiculous outcome: “I don’t think we need a byelection at the moment. On a pure political analysis why would Labor want a byelection in a seat that was held?”

And Rudd was successful in saving the party’s political furniture, as promised, estimating around 20 lower house seats were saved. “The former Prime Minister should be treated with a bit of respect. I am of the view that he has put a 5 in front of our number of House of Representative seats, rather than where we were heading with a 3 in front of it,” Cameron said.

Holt MP and former Rudd parliamentary secretary Anthony Byrne also slammed Emerson’s prime-time appearance: “it was a very unhelpful intervention by Mr Emerson last night … public character assessment is a very dangerous business. I think the public has heard enough about the internal machinations of the Labor Party to last a lifetime.”

Bruce MP and key Rudd numbers man Alan Griffin said the blame should be spread evenly and no one should be singled out: “Everyone in the party has to take responsibility for various events that have occurred. No one is blameless. We also have to properly consider what has taken place and evaluate it thoughtfully.

I can understand why people can react out of anger, but we all need to consider the facts to understand the lesson of the past so we can get the future right. I don’t agree with Craig’s interpretation but I think he raises some issues that people need to think about.”

There is likely to be an outbreak of extreme bloodletting in coming weeks as Labor moves to dislodge pent-up angst among the caucus who will be looking to get the shit off their livers.

It hasn’t been just Emerson keen on attacking the reputation of sitting MPs. Gorton MP and Gillard loyalist Brendan O’Connor, rumoured to be stepping down himself sometime during this term of parliament, took to the airwaves this morning to take a knife to Australia’s 26th prime minister. He told Sky News’ AM Agenda program that Rudd must “contemplate” sacking himself: “If you have a former prime minister sitting in your party room, on the backbench, that spectre looms large … it’s in the best interests of whoever is the leader for him to contemplate leaving.

He’s already made the right call in stepping down as leader, I think he was right to do that. He now has to make that further decision and I think it would be the general view that we’ve got to move forward, draw a line in the sand, and it’s better for him to leave.”

Former Hotham MP Simon Crean has also sledged Rudd for “destabilising” the party.

23
  • 1
    Hunt Ian
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Members of the ALP should follow Tanya Pliberseck’s lead and just not say a word on who was to blame for the defeat. The main lesson of the election was that disunity discredits you. Everyone can have their own opinions on who is responsible for the disunity but they do not need to air them. It only helps the Coalition, which is busy attacking Rudd as a wrecker after having done their utmost to use disunity in the ALP for their own advantage.
    It is bad enough seeing Abbott strutting around puffed up with pride, and Brandeis puffed up with vanity, interrupting Tanya Pliberseck on Q&A and then demanding she not interrupt his interruption, without seeing a continuation of the disunity that has bestowed these deadly sins on the rest of us.

  • 2
    Edward James
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Kevin Heiner Rudd has enough black on his name already, or have you forgotten. The lesson is disunity is death. Labor is certainly conflicted within itself. We won’t know if we are well represented until we see which way tony abbott will bounce. we have had chnges of government before not that many years ago. Edward James

  • 3
    zut alors
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

    If there was a by-election in Griffith the electorate would be handed to Liberal, Bill Glasson, who ran a strong campaign. There’s now a small ALP margin of less than 4%.

    Rudd is an effective member for Griffith: energetic, engaged, highly visible in the electorate. Even if he hadn’t been Prime Minister, voters in Griffith could always name their federal MP due to his newsletters and personal appearances. How many others in the House of Reps could boast that…

  • 4
    Jan Forrester
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

    Jeez, these guys (so far it is the males - thanks for sense, Tanya) are giving us a good look at tribal spleen. The Liberals have it too, but manage to swallow it with their tea. Who would want to wrangle (sorry, manage) this ALP mob? Maybe there should be a camping weekend in Bathurst or Lithgow where those-who-will-not-shut-up could be given instructions to search out the Light on the Hill, and not to come back unless they find it.

  • 5
    Edward James
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    Bill Glasson has much more to offer Griffith constituents than that retread Kevin heiner Rudd. The people who “wrangle” the allsorted political mobs have voted. Some of us like me won’t be happy with the numbers of Labor politicians who were voted back in. Edward James

  • 6
    Savonrepus
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    If Tony Abbott needs to implement a system to handle maverick senators the Labor party should be able to implement a system to handle maverick ex leaders. It might be handy to have access to someone who has the capability of actually mounting a successful election victory as Labor rebuilds.

    Interesting new possibility for Labor Leadership has just become available. Steve Bracks - now that guy can command an electorate.

  • 7
    Kevin Herbert
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    Rudd will resign his seat immediately after or even during the Libs planned judicial inquiry into his appallingly planned Home Insulation Program.

    The inquiry will begin within 12 weeks of 2 September last,and will show him to be the monumental fool/vacuous ego tripper he actually is to this day.

  • 8
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Someone else won Craig’s lost seat (for Labor).”?

  • 9
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Rudd’s been elected by the people of Griffith - to represent them - for another three years. Why should he resign?
    I would have thought he was best to take it up to Abbott in parliament, with his grasp of politics : Abbott’s grasping politics.

  • 10
    Andybob
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Could all those calling for peace and unity kindly shut up ? I’m breaking out the popcorn for an extended season of recrimination and retribution. Until all the cows have come home to roost there is no point papering over the cracks.

  • 11
    CML
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    Kevin Rudd is the elected member for Griffith for the next ?3 years. There is NO question that he should represent his electorate as he promised to do.
    As far as this unruly, vindictive, conspiracy theorist lot who spat the dummy when Rudd became PM again? Go and join your mates in the Coalition/Murdoch cabal, and shut the f++k up! You lot have done more damage to the Labor Party than Rudd ever could.

  • 12
    sparky
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 5:36 pm | Permalink

    Emerson, Julia Gillard’s former partner”, definitely sure this was not required, -1. Tanya P has been growing in my estimation for a few years. She could be our Mary Robinson.

  • 13
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 6:21 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think Labor, let alone the Coal-ition, will touch a female leader again for a long time.
    In the space of the ballot booth no one can hear you scream. Look what women did to Gillard, let alone men.

  • 14
    Pedantic, Balwyn
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    Labor MPs past and present should take Ms Pliberseck’s advice and shut up. Rudd destabilised the Party after Ms Gillard & Co ended his first term as PM. His actions were reprehensible, though understandable from his viewpoint. However it does not excuse his actions that not only discredited Gillard , but also the Party he claimed to love.
    However, Ms Gillard and Co should have more strenuously counselled him about his personal deficiencies. If Rudd then hadn’t remedied his dictatorial relationship with Caucus, they had grounds for “dismissal.

    As it happened the public had no understanding of the internal trauma and judged Ms Gillard & Co adversely. This of course played into Rudd’s hands.It also meant that Gillard could not promote either the success of Rudd’s term in respect of combating the GFC, Aboriginal Apology etc.

    Combined with the devastating negativity of Abbott, the rants of Murdoch and the total inability of the Labor Party to promote it’s success in the economy, NDIS etc the public turned on Gillard and back comes Rudd.

    Most would believe that Rudd was only interested in saving his reputation as saviour of the Labor Party, not the Party per se.

    In fairness after Gillard’s treatment she could not win and Rudd did save the furniture. However if Labor wants to regain power they must terminate with prejudice any discussion of Rudd staying or going and get on with proving they can be an effective, unified opposition.

  • 15
    geomac62
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    Pedantic, Balwyn
    Thats a reasonable view of events . Rudd should serve out his three years but thats it . No talking about him or media crap organised by him . Let him be a reminder to history students about how treachery can damage a party . Let Rudd serve as a comparison to Turnbull . Turnbull faced a party vote while Rudd did not and played the Martyr . He resigned having only the night before declaring he would stand . It is totally impossible to believe that Rudd had any love for the Labor party .

  • 16
    Chris Gulland
    Posted Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

    Hey labor party, just where does the buck stop for the taxpayer? Kevin Rudd has been re-elected to represent the good people of Griffin for the next three years. Now you want a by-election, to sort out your internal ructions, give the taxpayer a break! Stop thinking about yourselves, and get on with the job of being a good opposition.

  • 17
    klewso
    Posted Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 12:56 am | Permalink

    I thought what Rudd wanted to do was good - but not the way he wanted to do it.
    There’s no method in his madness.

  • 18
    Matt Hardin
    Posted Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Look forward to the insulation inquiry, Kevin. Will be good to see the people responsible go to gaol for industrial manslaughter… those cowboy contractors who can’t conduct and follow a risk assessment or job safety analysis.

    If you recall an earlier inquiry found fewer incidents and accidents per installation during the stimulus programme than in the period immediately before.

  • 19
    klewso
    Posted Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Would they publicise such findings - if they lessened the blame Abbott and Murdoch ass-scribed to Garrett and Rudd?

  • 20
    Dogs breakfast
    Posted Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

    Of course Emerson was right, he just should have said it behind closed doors. Rudd owes it to the Labor Party to get the hell out of politics.

    I rate him the most divisive character the Labor Party has seen in living memory, by a wide margin.

    A deeply, deeply flawed man.

  • 21
    Edward James
    Posted Friday, 13 September 2013 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Kevin Rudds presence is like a giant bill board displaying all that is wrong with Labor nationally. Whatever happens with that failed retread Kevin Heiner Rudd I am keen to see how the vote between Albo and Bill pans out. I would like to see little Bill Shorten get up not because I think he is the best man for the leadership of Labor in opposition. I want him elevated so we can ask him about the old days when he kept Bob Kernohan his mentor waiting nine years for his money. I want him to answer questions linked to the on going fraud squad inquiry into the AWU rorts. I doubt i will get my wish because too many Labor party people have more respect for Albo. Edward James

  • 22
    Edward James
    Posted Friday, 13 September 2013 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    while waiting moderation Labor select bill shorten so we can interrogate him! Edward James

  • 23
    Edward James
    Posted Friday, 13 September 2013 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    Fair dinkum Crikey you are getting more like Fairfax and News Corpse every day! Edward James

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...