Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter



Sep 10, 2013

Labor bloodletting continues over Kevin Rudd legacy

Labor frontbencher Craig Emerson's attempt to blacken Kevin Rudd's name has met with savage criticism from some sitting Labor MPs.

User login status :


Kevin Rudd

Key Kevin Rudd lieutenants have rounded on former frontbencher Craig Emerson’s slapdown of the Honourable Member for Griffith, telling Crikey the two-time PM saved the party from electoral oblivion and should be respected.

Emerson, Julia Gillard’s former partner, told the ABC last night that Rudd should quit politics for good after Labor’s defeat in Saturday’s election: “Anyone … who is so hell-bent on revenge, who is so destructive, as to depress the Labor vote in the 2010 election shouldn’t be rewarded for that sort of behaviour,” Emerson said.

“He came back as prime minister, the election was a disaster for Labor and Kevin Rudd’s continuing presence in the parliamentary Labor Party will see him do what he has always done, and that is willingly, wilfully, recklessly, destabilise Labor leaders.”

The Whyalla Wipe Out performer was responding to a confirmation from Victorian ALP Senator Kim Carr that Rudd would see out his three-year term as a federal MP.

NSW Senator and former parliamentary secretary for homelessness Doug Cameron hit back at Emerson this morning, telling Crikey he was wrong and Rudd critics were intent on prosecuting personal grudges and conspiracy theories. “This lack of respect and personal animosity and lack of courage from some people that didn’t take these issues up with Kevin Rudd when they were in senior ministerial positions just leaves me cold,” he said.

“I take the view that we need to move on from this. And the issue for us is to become a strong effective opposition and all my energies are about that and not relieving some personal slight or some conspiracy theory from the past.”

If a byelection were held in Griffith tomorrow, the Labor candidate would likely lose to popular LNP candidate Bill Glasson, further reducing the party’s representation when every seat will be crucial in the lead-up to the 2016 election.

Cameron said a return to the polls in Griffith so soon after the election would be a ridiculous outcome: “I don’t think we need a byelection at the moment. On a pure political analysis why would Labor want a byelection in a seat that was held?”

And Rudd was successful in saving the party’s political furniture, as promised, estimating around 20 lower house seats were saved. “The former Prime Minister should be treated with a bit of respect. I am of the view that he has put a 5 in front of our number of House of Representative seats, rather than where we were heading with a 3 in front of it,” Cameron said.

Holt MP and former Rudd parliamentary secretary Anthony Byrne also slammed Emerson’s prime-time appearance: “it was a very unhelpful intervention by Mr Emerson last night … public character assessment is a very dangerous business. I think the public has heard enough about the internal machinations of the Labor Party to last a lifetime.”

Bruce MP and key Rudd numbers man Alan Griffin said the blame should be spread evenly and no one should be singled out: “Everyone in the party has to take responsibility for various events that have occurred. No one is blameless. We also have to properly consider what has taken place and evaluate it thoughtfully.

“I can understand why people can react out of anger, but we all need to consider the facts to understand the lesson of the past so we can get the future right. I don’t agree with Craig’s interpretation but I think he raises some issues that people need to think about.”

There is likely to be an outbreak of extreme bloodletting in coming weeks as Labor moves to dislodge pent-up angst among the caucus who will be looking to get the shit off their livers.

It hasn’t been just Emerson keen on attacking the reputation of sitting MPs. Gorton MP and Gillard loyalist Brendan O’Connor, rumoured to be stepping down himself sometime during this term of parliament, took to the airwaves this morning to take a knife to Australia’s 26th prime minister. He told Sky News’ AM Agenda program that Rudd must “contemplate” sacking himself: “If you have a former prime minister sitting in your party room, on the backbench, that spectre looms large … it’s in the best interests of whoever is the leader for him to contemplate leaving.

“He’s already made the right call in stepping down as leader, I think he was right to do that. He now has to make that further decision and I think it would be the general view that we’ve got to move forward, draw a line in the sand, and it’s better for him to leave.”

Former Hotham MP Simon Crean has also sledged Rudd for “destabilising” the party.

Andrew Crook —

Andrew Crook

Former Crikey Senior Journalist

Get a free trial to post comments
More from Andrew Crook


We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

23 thoughts on “Labor bloodletting continues over Kevin Rudd legacy

  1. Pedantic, Balwyn

    Labor MPs past and present should take Ms Pliberseck’s advice and shut up. Rudd destabilised the Party after Ms Gillard & Co ended his first term as PM. His actions were reprehensible, though understandable from his viewpoint. However it does not excuse his actions that not only discredited Gillard , but also the Party he claimed to love.
    However, Ms Gillard and Co should have more strenuously counselled him about his personal deficiencies. If Rudd then hadn’t remedied his dictatorial relationship with Caucus, they had grounds for “dismissal.

    As it happened the public had no understanding of the internal trauma and judged Ms Gillard & Co adversely. This of course played into Rudd’s hands.It also meant that Gillard could not promote either the success of Rudd’s term in respect of combating the GFC, Aboriginal Apology etc.

    Combined with the devastating negativity of Abbott, the rants of Murdoch and the total inability of the Labor Party to promote it’s success in the economy, NDIS etc the public turned on Gillard and back comes Rudd.

    Most would believe that Rudd was only interested in saving his reputation as saviour of the Labor Party, not the Party per se.

    In fairness after Gillard’s treatment she could not win and Rudd did save the furniture. However if Labor wants to regain power they must terminate with prejudice any discussion of Rudd staying or going and get on with proving they can be an effective, unified opposition.

Leave a comment