tip off

Media wrap: Bolt gloats as scribes deliver post-mortems

The pundits weigh in on the significance of Abbott’s victory. Andrew Bolt and Piers Akerman, unsurprisingly, are over the moon.

As the curtains came down on the Rudd-Gillard era last night, the press gallery scribes and the op-ed columnists were busy in the wings, bashing away on their keyboards, sizing up the moment, honing the first draft of history.

According to The Age’s Michael Gordon, despite the swing against the government being smaller than expected, Kevin Rudd is less saviour than villain:

The Kevin Rudd experiment has failed and failed comprehensively — and Labor now faces the colossal challenge of rebuilding and redefining and reconnecting, most likely under the leadership of Bill Shorten. Rudd insists he is not into ‘what-ifs’ but he and his party must surely reflect on the squandered opportunity of the last six years, and wonder how a talented government that pursued and implemented some landmark policies could succumb to such collective insanity and division.”

Over at The Conversation, however, Michelle Grattan is more forgiving:

In assessing Kevin Rudd’s performance, it depends where you’re coming from. Rudd’s destabilisation over the last three years has contributed mightily to the perception of a fractured and disunited government. But his return to the leadership has significantly contained the swing against Labor — which under Julia Gillard was likely to be huge — to a relatively modest level.”

Also at The Convo, Shaun Carney warns Abbott will have to quickly change his style as prime minister:

Vindication is his, but there is still the small matter of actually doing the job now that he has secured it. Abbott as an opposition leader was frenzied, intense, relentless, functionally incapable of pulling back and changing either his tone or his rhetoric. Now that they are in charge, Abbott and his likely treasurer Joe Hockey will have to transform their political approach instantaneously. The hysterics of the past few years will no longer be of use to them.”

No such concerns for the Herald Sun’s Andrew Bolt. It’s his day to celebrate — and rub the Left’s face in it:

 ”Tony Abbott, written off as ‘unelectable’, has led the Coalition to one of its biggest wins. This is a victory over a cultural elite that mocked him and Labor, which vilified him as a ‘misogynist’ and bigot. It is particularly a victory over the green movement, which Abbott fought from the day he won the Opposition leadership four years ago … Labor bet its house on it, smearing Abbott as a woman-hating ‘thug’. Journalists fanned that deceitful stereotype. In fact, Abbott is seriously smart, literate and considerate, as well as ferociously disciplined and competitive. Voters saw that in the campaign.”

The Sunday Telegraph’s Piers Akerman also took time to gloat:

Despite the relentless smear campaign which began from the moment he was elected Opposition Leader, Abbott comes to office without any skeletons rattling in his closet. He is neither a bully nor a thug, contrary to the baseless stories peddled by Labor lickspittles in the media pack. He is a man of values and principles, a family man with a loving wife and daughters, a man with mates across the spectrum, mates who may not parade themselves in the public eye for PR purposes but who know the special value of true friendship.”

Also at The Sunday Tele, union leader Paul Howes was stoic in defeat:

There are so many things the Coalition will now have to support and implement that simply would never have happened if it were not for Labor. Does anyone seriously believe a National Disability Insurance Scheme would be coming in if not for Labor? And just as the electorate will punish a government for poor discipline, similarly they will grow tired very quickly of a small-minded Coalition, which fails to engage seriously with the big, long-term challenges we confront. Labor must remember this, keep calm and carry on.”

The Sun-Herald’s Peter FitzSimons admits he was wrong to think Abbott was unelectable. Fitzy, too, is looking on the bright side:

[I]t is possible — just possible — that Abbott will surprise us. If he can get to the prime ministership against all odds, in part on the back of the amazingly generous paid parental leave scheme — which runs entirely contrary to his entire policy drive before that — there has to be a chance that he will embrace other surprising policy U-turns.”

18
  • 1
    Matthew of Canberra
    Posted Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    Meh. Abbott just had to not screw up and appear viable and let the bolt and his mates do the campaigning. The ALP delivered that result - the other guys just had to not do a mark latham or a john kerry.

    He won with an electorate that believes that rudd crushes the hands of small children out of revenge, who punches walls when he doesn’t get his way, who’s a sociopath (just ask janet). The same electorate has been systematically convinced that the previous PM was a corrupt lawyer who assisted criminal enterprises and tried to hush it up. But the libs did win, and party discipline (with instant banishment otherwise) helped a lot.

    Now for the fun part. While it’s still fresh, go and make copies of all the friendly coverage, and the promises, and the obliquely vague implications. Keep them in a folder somewhere, and revisit them in three years. The liberal campaign ran on an obvious foundation of “just say anything”. So, put away a little time capsule of what they said now, and you’ll get a wry chuckle from it before the next election.

    The NBN will still be behind schedule and over budget, and contractors will still be moaning about having to compete - except that it’ll be fairfax reporting on it. We’ll still have a price on carbon, the national history curriculum will be unchanged, the NDIS will be underfunded, gonski reforms will be a shambles, boats will still be trying to get to Australia, and the odd one or two will still go off radar. The PPL as proposed will not happen, and assistance for the car industry will continue. The economy will continue its existing trends until china and the US pick up again, and joe hockey will take credit for that. Unemployment is going to increase in the meantime, and joe hockey will not take credit for that. National average house prices are going to fall, relative to inflation, joe will only take credit for that if the audience likes the idea and nobody’s around to report on it. There won’t be an internet filter, be it mandatory or opt-out, for exactly the same reasons that we don’t have one now. And they’ll screw up, like all first-term governments do, and ALP-voting public servants will continue to not leak against the new government in anything like the way that liberal-voting public servants leaked against the last one, so most people will never hear about the tantrums.

  • 2
    janr
    Posted Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    maybe the wrong place to ask, but does anyone know what’s happening with the Abbott/Etteridge court case- there is never anything in the msm

  • 3
    Electric Lardyland
    Posted Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    Interesting comment from Bolt that Abbott’s victory, ‘was particularly a victory over the green movement, which Abbott fought from the day he won the Opposition leadership’.
    Well, let’s see how that claim stacks up with the policies that Abbott took into the election. Firstly, how did Abbott go in fighting the Greens, with their misguided view, (according to Bolt) that climate change is real and that we should implement policy to cut Australian emissions? Well, according to the words that came out of Abbott’s mouth, these are also his beliefs. Okay, so how about the Greens belief that the old school funding model was skewed to favour wealthy schools and should be reformed? Well, apparently that’s Tony’s policy too. How about no cuts to universities or the health system. Well, Tony has said over and over again, that there’ll be no cuts there. So, what about the Greens support for a NBN. Well, apparently Tony will still be building a NBN: well, sort of. Okay, so how about the Greens paid parental leave policy? Okay, so admittedly, Abbott’s policy is much more generous to the wealthy, but there is a great deal of similarity between the two policy positions. So what else is there? Well how about the Greens policy that refugees should be treated with compassion? Ah, finally a difference.
    Though, Tony and his cronies, did vote with the Greens to block the Malaysian swap deal; on the grounds that he had a deep moral objection to sending refugees back to countries that hadn’t signed the UN Convention on Refugees. Of course, his words and actions since then, suggest that this justification may have been a bare faced lie.
    Oh dear, what if Abbott’s other Green-like policy positions are also lies?
    What does Andrew Bolt know?
    And of course, if any of these relentlessly proclaimed policy positions turn out also to be lies, I so look forward to a couple of years of constantly vehement, rabid criticism of Abbott, from the likes of Bolt, Jones, Akerman, Devine, Albrechtsen, etc, etc.

    P.S. Has anybody else noticed how Margie Abbott is almost a dead ringer for Tony Abbott?
    ‘Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the fairest of th…..??? Oh, is that you, Margie?’

  • 4
    Posted Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    ELECTRIC LARDYLAND: Yeah, I noticed how similar they are when watching the Rabbott’s victory speech; their noses are particularly similar.

    Was it my imagination or was The Rabbott’s decision to shove his family into the background for his moment of triumph was a cruel act. One directed against, a family that had supported him so thoroughly?

    NB, it is a family of females, and we all know what he thinks of them.

    Despite the gloating of the Andrew Bolt, Piers Ackerman and the tidal wave of Rupert Murdoch’s hired help. Minions, would be a better description.

    I see the election vote as being a negative one. People voted against Labor, rather than voting for Tony Abbott.

  • 5
    Enquvist
    Posted Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Smear campaign? Everything that was reported was the idiocy coming out of Abbott’s mouth. Smear?? Seriously??

  • 6
    AR
    Posted Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    Having chased the top job for so long, will he be the junk yard dog that chased cars but didn’t know what to do when he finally caught one?

  • 7
    Pedantic, Balwyn
    Posted Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 7:03 pm | Permalink

    The right wing campaign to rubbish the “leftie” policies that Abbott adopted to win over the marginal voters has already started.
    Populist, but totally inaccurate letters about the NBN were published in today’s Melbourne Herald. Next we will have the campaign that funding public schools is unfair to people who pay their way etc.climate change is unproven, so why spend any money on re-newables etc.
    It will go on relentlessly as moderates in the LNP are removed from office and the Right takes over; aided and abetted by Bolt, Murdoch,IPA and any other soul unwilling to accept fairness and reason.

  • 8
    klewso
    Posted Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 9:04 pm | Permalink

    They can gloat now - it is their turn, after the last 6 years of their reactions.

  • 9
    klewso
    Posted Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 9:04 pm | Permalink

    Re “Respect for the office of PM”?
    After 12 years acting as publicity manager for Howard, then 6 years of ripping Labor’s to pieces, it will be interesting if there is a Limited News call to return to that respect?
    “Talk to the Hand Rupert.”

  • 10
    Carbon Footprint
    Posted Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 11:05 pm | Permalink

    The irony could be that Abbot might be stuck with a Carbon Tax he complains about but be benefitting from the revenue. Rudd was going to scrap it anyway so everyone gets the opposite of what they voted for.

  • 11
    klewso
    Posted Monday, 9 September 2013 at 7:40 am | Permalink

    Murdoch’s abuse of power - business as usual.

  • 12
    Jack Phat
    Posted Monday, 9 September 2013 at 8:37 am | Permalink

    Tony Rabbit would have to be the first LAME DUCK Prime Minister from Day 1 in the job. Now we’ll see just what a dunce this bloke really is when there is no where to hide, backed up by fellow dunces like The Whiner and Burnbaby Footinmouth not to forget Anorexia Joe.
    He will be the greatest international embarrasment this country has ever produced and by a long way, no conceded passes in the big house Tony; hould take some pressure off the Aussie willow wackers and Wanabies.

  • 13
    Thorn
    Posted Monday, 9 September 2013 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    Without actually articulating a single policy that made any sense, and just saying basically vote for us because we are not them, the conservatives won.

    And it is Labors fault. The obvious first reason is the change of leadership to Gillard and then back to Rudd. It made not one bit of difference to the running of the government, but it allowed the Liberals to claim Labor was an unstable government in continual crisis.

    To people with no interest in, or knowledge of politics I guess that it seemed important. And the press was pathetic about it, failing to explain clearly to the public that this is how our system works.

    If people want a system where THEY vote for a leader, become a Republic. Until then, accept that in our system no one votes for a PM, just for their local member.

    Secondly Labor allowed the Liberals to set the agenda all the time. The fact that Australia got through the GFC without economic or social catastrophe was lost under the liberal attack on the very spending programs that got the country through unscathed. Hell, even during the worst economic crisis in 80 years, Labor managed to get the country a AAA credit rating, something that had never happened before! I know that it is hard to get people to understand how close the bus came to hitting them, because it didn’t and life went on, but Labor did not really try to make people understand. They left the field open for Abbott to make whatever claim he wanted, and for the Right wing media to blow it all out of proportion.

    I hope that beginning this week Labor does exactly the same thing to Abbott. Every tiny divergence from his announced policies, and every penny cut from a program he said would be quarantined or protected from cuts should be shouted out as a LIE!

    There is no such thing as a change of policy anymore, no possibility of adjustment to meet more current circumstances. No more core and non-core promises. From now on everything is a LIE.

    Labor should attempt to make it as hard as possible for him to govern, and they should talk the economy down and generally be as negative as they possibly can for at least two years - enough to hopefully mean that the Liberals will look at going to the next election with a different leader. I have no real problem with a lot of Liberal policies, I just cannot stand the extreme conservative stance of Abbott and his cronies.

    Western Sydney looked like it was going to swing completely to the Liberals, but it appears that there is a fair old ‘suppository of wisdom’ there, as they showed they were not completely brain washed by Jones/Hadley/Telegraph etc.

    Having said that, a lot of the very people that Labor saved by their economic policies from 2008 have turned against them. To them I say you seriously have to change where you get your information and be a bit more questioning of the motives of the people that are deciding what you should know.

    To the media I say please stop repeating stuff just because it is someone elses opinion. Conventional wisdom is not a serious basis for an article that has the potential to influence peoples thoughts - it is just opinion.

    If Labor just goes on and on about any failure at all by Abbott, any rise in interest rates, any change in the terms of trade - anything that shows even the slightest down turn in the economy, then Abbott will not have the completely clear air that any new government needs to bed down and appear capable. If all this keeps people worried about spending money the retail sales will stay depressed and house prices will stay down and people will be to worried to get themselves into long term debt and the anxiety that has gripped people for the last three or four years will continue. They will have got the government they deserve.

    Then they will see that Abbott’s success has been built on a complete disregard of the well being of the country, and solely on crass personal ambition.

  • 14
    Thorn
    Posted Monday, 9 September 2013 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    Not that I am a sore loser you understand!

  • 15
    the duke
    Posted Monday, 9 September 2013 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    nobody complained with the media’s love fest of Kevin07. Yes, I rest easy at night knowing that I was not involved with that movement.

    Rudd will go down as probably, the worst PM in Australian History and rightly so. Despite the view among socialists that Rudd was the superior choice for PM, he was clearly out flanked by Abbott at every stage over the past 4 years.

    the fact that Rudd’s defeat speech went for 22 minutes, and Abbotts victory speech went for 11 minutes, speaks volumes for an egomaniac that was exposed as a woeful leader.

  • 16
    Serenatopia
    Posted Monday, 9 September 2013 at 11:32 am | Permalink

    Good comment Matthew of Canberra — -Liberals will take credit for global after-effects — -just Labor has done! Australia’s economy is resource rich — -intellectually poor! This means that a basic reliance on Keynesian principles will usually save its arse — ie spend spend spend when you can’t afford it! Not really genius! -unfortunately this equation does not always work as we’ve seen in US and Europe — -you are right though that we will see a miraculous resuscitation of the mining boom that was meant to last 100 years — -but this will not be because of the genius of The Liberals but again to global after-effects of the US and China economies…At the end if the day — -elected bureaucracies do not shape policies they just run them — -the real decision makers are not mentioned on the ballot!

  • 17
    Hamis Hill
    Posted Monday, 9 September 2013 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    Tone’s got his mortgage problems sorted, but what about the rest of the 1.75 Trillion dollar mortgage market?
    Joe is going to set up 40 year Bonds so that mortgages can be extended and made affordable.
    And Australia’s first DLP PM will not last; the real liberals don’t need him anymore.
    Do the Baillieu on Abbott, Bone The Tone!
    Three word slogans are a winner, BONE THE TONE!

  • 18
    klewso
    Posted Monday, 9 September 2013 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    I’ve been doing a bit of reading these last coupe of months, and maybe some of us are being a bit hard on Murdoch with his Limited News?

    I mean if he didn’t employ these bottom-feeding supercilious elite media ubertrolls (who else gets their own columns at the exclusion of alternate edited-out opinion?) paid to foster and nurture intolerance, anxiety, suspicion, distrust and uncertainty in the greater community, from their privileged positions, controlling our view of news (like his Blot and the rest of the troupe) for political clout - who would?

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...