tip off

Kim Williams lobbed out of News Corp, clearing path for Murdoch Jnr?

Kim Williams has walked from the nation’s most powerful media post, putting a print and company loyalist back in charge at News Corp Australia. Williams was on borrowed time according to insiders.

The resignation this morning of highbrow opera and Campari fan Kim Williams from the top job at Holt Street has come as relief for some News Corp Australia senior journalists and executives, who say they are finally free to rip off the yoke of spreadsheets and KPIs and get back to reporting.

Williams, admired for building up Foxtel over more than a decade before the advent of fast broadband and bit torrent clients, has battled in his 20 months in the CEO’s office, after being tapped by Rupert Murdoch to slash costs by 20% over three years and embark on a management consultant-driven reform agenda.

Gough Whitlam’s son-in-law nudged aside company legend and former Fairfax cadet John Hartigan, a decision that still rankles inside the company built on an aggressive editorial focus despite the Sun King’s treasured dead-tree editorial offerings becoming increasingly mired in red ink.

Now, 69-year-old Murdoch loyalist and keen tennis player Julian Clarke — a former Herald and Weekly Times MD who resigned as a HWT director alongside Rupert’s sister Janet Calvert-Jones just two months ago — will be tapped as CEO, with speculation rife today that he is a placeholder before an expected transition to Lachlan Murdoch.

As Crikey revealed on Monday, there has been significant unrest inside News over the merging of the ad sales teams into one national edifice, the streamlining of 19 editorial divisions into state-based conglomerates and the pained introduction of the $60 million EIDOS Methode production system.

The $10 million marketing pitch for the “News+” subscription brand has also foundered, with a marketing insider telling Crikey that “the only thing News is producing in abundance is a truckload of internal PowerPoint presentations, hiring consultants, shuffling papers and org charts and scratching their heads as to why audiences are leaving in droves”.

The initiatives formed part of Williams’ riding instructions from Rupert to streamline operations, and were bedded down 13 months ago in this now infamous fireside chat when mass redundancies were announced across the company.

Highly-paid Boston Consulting suits were drafted in to effect the changes, however their looming presence in Holt Street corridors supremely pissed off newsroom staff as endless meetings and presentations cut into precious newsgathering time.

A senior News source confirmed to Crikey that a Nick Leys Australian item reporting that Williams told a Col Allan gee-up session nine days ago he had “journalism at its pulsating heart” and was “actually an editor at heart” was viewed as either an 11th-hour plea for relevance or a suicide note. A paragraph detailing the unease with the presence of ex-Boston operatives at the meeting was removed from the online version.

At a broadside delivered against News at a press conference early this afternoon, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd referred specifically to last week’s meeting, saying editors were told “to go hard on Rudd, start from Sunday and don’t back off”.

Media reports this morning have focused on the role played by the recent arrival of New York Post editorial supremo Allan to reenergise the tabloids, also mentioned by Rudd. But internal unrest has been bubbling for many months. On another view, Williams had done what he was hired to do: bed down a new structure in the company as a “change agent” and then make way for a revitalised editorial focus. That was the line peddled by New York-based News Corp CEO Robert Thomson: in a statement lodged with the ASX, Thomson explained that:

Kim feels now is the right moment to leave the company, which he has served for two decades, following the successful implementation of the first stage of News Corp Australia’s strategy to drive integration and improve efficiency, to invest in its editorial products and publishing system, and secure a path of growth in a multi platform world.”

In an exclamation mark-laden farewell email sent to staff this morning, Williams hinted at the issues that have plagued his reign:

There have been many good wins matched with some memorable awful problems and opponents! It has all been the stuff of a rich and varied professional life that I would never have had without the benefit of the trust reposed in me by many great colleagues at News Corp.”

Senior News sources explained the relief this morning, describing the mood on the newsroom floor as “bouyant”: “There was a strong feeling among senior journalists that Kim was considered to be a management guy. Harto actually had ink in his veins while Kim was just this bizarre detached figure. The News culture is one where you actually have the journalists running the company.”

Clarke is a member at Royal South Yarra and went down in the final of the “over 100” mens’ veterans club championship doubles last year to the dynamic duo of David Hepworth and Antony Hearnden (the combined age of the players would seem to have to top a tonne). A genial and respected figure, he looked uncomfortable giving evidence in the witness box against Bruce Guthrie at the latter’s Supreme Court unfair dismissal trial in 2010.

He is expected to work as a peacemaker inside Holt Street, using his diplomatic skills to work with editors, maintain a bridge with the Murdochs and talk to advertisers. At Clarke’s HWT farewell drinks Rupert apparently dubbed him the “perfect publisher” because he could take angry calls from politicians but still let the editors do their job.

While the “new News Corp” will likely generate earnings of over $850 million this financial year, its Australian newspaper division is foundering with The Australian copping heavy losses but working hard on a turnaround. A lumbering cost base has been blamed across the group for continued poor performance. News Corp’s share price on the Australian Stock Exchange was up nearly half a percent to $17.93 as Crikey’s deadline approached.

23
  • 1
    Salamander
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    Geez, his wife might have threatened to divorce him. I would hope.

  • 2
    wilful
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Pushing thru the marketing
    So many editors sighing
    News Ltd had just come on,
    We had five years left to cry in

    News guy wept and told us
    Their business is really dying
    Kim cried so much his face was wet
    Then I knew he was not lying

    I heard tapped telephones, Foxtel, gated information
    I saw big swinging dicks, churnalism, e-strategies and “content”
    My brain hurts like a warehouse
    It has no room to spare
    I had to cram so many things
    To store everything in there
    And all the fat-skinny people, and all the tall-short people
    And all the nobody people, and all the somebody people
    I never thought I’d hear about so many irrelevant people

    Rebekah Brooks went off her head
    Hit some tiny politician
    If Rupert hadn’t a-pulled her off, I think she would have killed them

    A journo with a broken source, fixed his stare on the twitter
    The cops knelt and kissed the feet of the Sun King
    And I threw up at the sight of that
    I think I saw Fairfax in an ice-cream parlour
    Drinking the Kool-Aid all day long
    Smiling and waving and looking so fine
    Don’t think you knew you were in this song

    And it was cold and it rained and I felt so uninformed
    And I thought of proper journalism and I wanted to get some of that
    Your thoughts, your analysis, the way that you express
    I kiss you, you’re beautiful, I want you to walk

    We’ve got five years, stuck on my eyes
    We’ve got five years, what a surprise
    We’ve got five years, my brain hurts a lot
    We’ve got five years, that’s all we’ve got

  • 3
    Bill Hilliger
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Many (in spite of Kim being sent packing) say they still wont buy News Ltd crappy products. The sooner Rupert’s crappy merchandise sinks into oblivion the better.

  • 4
    rubiginosa
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    This calls for some vintage IPA:

    That [Kim Williams] is both an outsider and has a background in broadcasting and, more particularly, broadcasting technology makes him an excellent appointment. The last thing [NewsCorp] needs is an ideologue to the taste of [NewsCorp] staff.

    Perhaps some Grattan:

    [Robert Thomson’s] problems with [his] reshuffle will be how it is perceived. [His] danger is it will be seen as [executives] deserting a sinking ship and that it adds to an impression of chaos, which can be used to fuel doubt about [his, and Rupert’s] judgment.

    Chris Kenny, probably:

    The shadow of [Kim Williams] hangs over him,” [insert name] says, referring to the CEO who attempted to shake up the organisation, triggered a revolt by staff and supporters, and resigned 18 months into his five-year appointment.
    The [NewsCorp] organisational chart, which shows a series of program producers answering to heads of news, current affairs, [tabloid bullshit] or the like, can best be viewed as a collective of staff collectives. The easiest way for a manager to consolidate his or her position in the organisation is to be seen to stand up for the staff below them, entrenching the will of the collective.

    So a critical question for [Clarke] is to what degree he seeks to drive and influence the [NewsCorp] culture, and to what degree he represents the decisions of the many program producers below him.

  • 5
    Bill Hilliger
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    Andrew: …Highly-paid Boston Consulting suits were drafted in to affect the changes. Affect… effect? Big difference in context.

  • 6
    Salamander
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    So Julian Clarke is 69. So what? It seems Kim is far too canny to have his age bandied about.

  • 7
    Pedantic, Balwyn
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Murdoch’s attack on Rudd will please the rusted on Abbott lovers, but the vast majority of readers are neither lovers or haters of either man and will simply ignore the diatribe and the papers that publish them. In fact the more one-sided the News Ltd journals become, the less likely that the majority will bother to buy them;especially as they can get their news on line.

  • 8
    Andrew Crook
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    @Bill they were there to change the way change is happening.

  • 9
    Mark from Melbourne
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Yes, Kim signed off on the Eidos deal which was a $60m+ waste of money but the real culprits are sitting a rung below. CIO, John Pittard, and his senior team have presided over some colossal and expensive failures - Kim pales in comparison in terms of spend on overpaid consultants. Kim’s failure is that he didn’t identify this as a major weakness and fix it, along with some of the other “silos of failure” which have long been News’ greatness structural weakness.

  • 10
    Bill Hilliger
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 5:24 pm | Permalink

    fair enough Andrew

  • 11
    ric lagasca
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    You’d have to guess that matters financial at News are quite a lot worse than they are letting on. It’s no surprise that the editors resist management. They always have. What is surprising is Rupert’s continued preference for the bovver boys and girls. It’s no way to lead change.

  • 12
    Tom Jones
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    Amazing that when the rivers of gold have turned to dross that the best that News Corp can come up with is partisan junk. Might encourage some to keep buying and rabid right wingers to see a scandal but why buy a paper when the headline says it all? I don’t buy News Limited because it is so partisan and sensationalist and other media offers real news not just gotcha journalism.

  • 13
    zut alors
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    With a little tweaking News Corp can turn their newspapers into comics - they are almost there now. Perhaps it would stimulate sales, nothing else is likely to.

  • 14
    klewso
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    Nice to see Abbott (the recipient of so much Limited News positive PR and a resistance to publicising anything embarrassing, that would damage their party’s electoral stocks) so sad at the passing of Williams, for his devotion to “freedom of speech”?
    The only freedom of speech Williams or Murdoch are interested in is being able to drown out alternate speech and opinion by using their resources, from their market-share, to do it.

  • 15
    A news ad sales rep
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    For god sakes Crikey - get it right! We’ve had one national ad sales team dealing with major clients for fifteen years, and we still have state based ad sales teams. The only thing that has changed in the last two years is we now sell across all products in the state. Check with someone in sales next time you publish, not just journos.

  • 16
    Davis Bernie
    Posted Friday, 9 August 2013 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    All I would like to say to Kim is Bollocks and good bye!

  • 17
    Dave Kelly
    Posted Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 7:31 am | Permalink

    You know, The Australian could double its circulation if it wasn’t such a biased, bigoted and conservative pile of crap. As it is, it alienates half its potential audience. Is this not obvious? The thought of buying a copy makes me choke. Is the thought that The OZ was actually a newspaper once a delusion on my behalf?

  • 18
    klewso
    Posted Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 9:59 am | Permalink

    What “Trabbesty”?
    Limited Views - “The Trabby of Australian viewsmedia”?
    “You can have any politics you like - as long as it’s Right!”?

  • 19
    magoo
    Posted Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    Scratching their heads as to why audiences are leaving in droves”.

    Once trust is lost, it’s nearly impossible to gain back. More like scratching their heads at how they can gain trust and follow editorial direction at the same time.

  • 20
    larry dixon
    Posted Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 11:21 am | Permalink

    This guy is one of the most over rated senior execs in Australian.
    He lost a bomb when he ran the ABC satellite startup in the early 90’s and followed that with the Titanic like $500m disaster Fox Studios theme park that crashed after 3 months.
    And anyone could have made Foxtel a winner, it was a virtual monopoly!

    For sure the arts community will welcome him back, where his blathering temper tanties will be held in high esteem

  • 21
    Liamj
    Posted Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 11:36 pm | Permalink

    Dear Rupert, THANKYOU for choosing to keep your own ‘frothing autocrats’ in place, it’ll keep News Corpse withering as its aging demographic .. declines.

    @ ‘A news ad sales rep’ - can you reveal the extent of decline in ad sales? 40% yoy i thought i’d read, but have no evidence to hand.

  • 22
    shepmyster
    Posted Sunday, 11 August 2013 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    I’ve just started a facebook page called limited News http://www.facebook.com/limitednews?skip_nax_wizard=true Please feel free to post any complaints you may have against Murdoch or his so called journalists.
    I don’t know what’s to be done about the Murdoch press, to me it’s no better than the Soviets Tass news agency only it serves a different master.
    There is no individual who can take this man on or government it seems. It’s up to people who are sick to death of the Murdoch presses behaviour to organize against them. How I’m not quite sure. All I do know that the first step must be to organize ourselves. Please let your feelings be known

  • 23
    A news ad sales rep
    Posted Thursday, 15 August 2013 at 8:06 pm | Permalink

    @Liamj I can only talk for my team, but we wrote 5% more revenue for News YOY in the metro papers, and I believe my wider team was pretty close to annual budget. Its easy enough to confirm, if ad revenues are down 40% why is this not reflected in SMI or Adex?

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...