tip off

Crean’s coup flops as Rudd fades away

Simon Crean’s impassioned speech this afternoon imploring Kevin Rudd to challenge for the Labor leadership took everyone by surprise — most especially Kevin Rudd.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard has stared down an attempt to resolve Labor’s ongoing leadership woes after former PM Kevin Rudd declined to contest a leadership spill sparked by Simon Crean’s defection.

The surprise intervention by Crean to request that the Prime Minister call a spill appeared to take the Rudd camp by surprise and left Rudd’s allies no time to muster the numbers to defeat the Prime Minister; Crean himself failed to bring sufficient numbers to Rudd as putative deputy leader to make up the difference between Rudd’s core support and the 51 votes needed to defeat the Prime Minister.

Rudd’s decision was based, he said, on a determination to keep his word not to challenge the Prime Minister or accept a return to the leadership unless drafted by an overwhelming majority of his colleagues.

In asking the Prime Minister to bring on a spill, Crean stated he had not consulted with Rudd — and the evidence of that was clear in Rudd’s response.

Crean has been sacked from his cabinet position and now joins Rudd on the backbench.

Chief Rudd spruiker Joel Fitzgibbon, who has been described as a “freelancer on a suicide mission” by Rudd camp sources, has said he would be “considering his position” as Chief Whip.

With Rudd declining to contest, Crean’s effort appears to have failed: the incessant speculation over Julia Gillard’s leadership may quiet for a time, but it is likely to eventually resume, with the media having demonstrated they are prepared to continue running leadership stories until parties respond.

The result is the overshadowing of what was a historic day in Parliament: the apology to the victims of forced adoptions in the Great Hall, where both Julia Gillard and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott made heartfelt, resonant speeches about the issue before hundreds of mothers and children torn apart by forced adoption policies.

This may well go down as “Crean’s gambit”, an attempt to short-circuit Labor’s leadership difficulties, incited by a media obsessed with leadership stories. Julia Gillard remains as Prime Minister, but Labor’s poor position in the polls — and a febrile media — also remain.

  • 1
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    Today is a recognition that the ALP are facing at least three terms in opposition at a Federal level, no matter who’s the leader. I cant see Kev spending all that time as opposion leader so dont be surprised to see Kevin Rudd as the next Premier of QLD…

  • 2
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    How naive we all were to believe that Labor actually wanted to defeat Tony Abbott. Morons.

  • 3
    Paddy Forsayeth
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    The trouble is they are looking at Gillard and not on their party and social contract. They are little different politically than the Libs. except that Abbott is one of the slimiest lying …ts to grace the political stage.

  • 4
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    The gap between the Gillard and Abbott camps widen - her’s are in Competent and his are in Tolerable?
    We’re caught in the middle?

  • 5
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 7:21 pm | Permalink

    Gillards anonymous win as Leader again makes Abbott’s one vote win look weak.
    Abbott was ranting that the minority govt “experiment” had failed. Given his level of honesty, integrity etc we can expect to see him immediately call another election if he finds himself a party to such a failed “experiment”.

  • 6
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 7:24 pm | Permalink

    BERNARD KEANE: You don’t think there was a hint that Kevin Rudd was backing away from accepting the poisoned chalice? Or is the whole thing a secret deal between Labor and the conservative parties to hand Tony Abbott the leadership of Oz he so desperately craves? If so, why spend all that taxpayers’ money to hold an election? Just give it to the bastards.

  • 7
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    Yes but the media will still blame Rudd - they are whining morons.

  • 8
    Kate Ahearne
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 7:41 pm | Permalink

    Actually, Bernard, we don’t know that ‘Labor’s poor position in the polls’ will remain. Watching the story unfold today, I had the distinct impression that what had happened could only boost Gillard’s standing with the public. She was elected unopposed. What could be stronger than that? The Murdoch Press blew their big chance, and if speculation continues in the media, it will be, quite clearly, a media beat-up. Yes, there are those within the party who would like to see Gillard deposed, but they have failed. Again. So let’s just see what the pollsters come up with, and let’s those of us who want the Labor-led minority government to do its best for Australia in the coming months, switch our attention to policy on both sides.

    What part of ‘unanimous’ and ‘unopposed’ is so difficult to understand? Today was a victory for the PM and for the Labor party.

  • 9
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    Prime Minister Tony Abbott! I thought I’d just type this to see how it reads, what it looks like, sounds like, some useful preparative psychotherapy…
    • The Prime Minister Tony Abbott said…
    • Tony Abbott PM said today..
    • In question time today PM Abbott denied allegations that he admired Hitler..

  • 10
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    The leadership speculation will continue exactly as long as the polls that would see a significant proportion of caucus lose their seats continue.

  • 11
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    Crean lances the festering carbuncle …. and gets “sent to Siberia” for his troubles…..?

  • 12
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Kate, being elected unopposed is not being elected, it is maintaining the status quo.

    Do learn how to use language correctly.

  • 13
    Kate Ahearne
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    Dear shepherdmarilyn, I’m surprised you have never heard or seen the term, ‘elected unopposed’ used in an appropriate context by people whose command of English is quite impeccable. You might like to Google the term. I think you’ll find it has currency and quite a respectable history. In the meantime, what do you think about what happened today? I’d be interested to know.

  • 14
    Elbow Patches
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    Was there something odd about Crean’s choice of words this morning regarding Rudd? How could he in one breath state that “he (rudd) needs to stop playing games and have the courage of his convictions” (hardly respectful) whilst at the same time suggest that he would run as the deputy? What leader would want a deputy who spoke about him in such terms? Was it ever serious that Crean could be deputy and wouldn’t Rudd have got the message? Just seems pretty strange. Crean may have been doing JG a favour.

  • 15
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    Look I loathe Abbott with an abiding passion however Gillard’s habitual abuse of the word, ‘future’ is like nails on a blackboard for me.

    She may have a chance of winning more people over if she cuts out the trite shibboleths whenever she opens her mouth.

  • 16
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    Is Rudd a poltergeist?

  • 17
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 8:44 pm | Permalink

    Did they stage manage this melodrama today to purge themselves - or was it for real?

  • 18
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    Today was a victory for the PM and the Labor party, Kate? A minister in the government, an ex opposition leader no less, launches a challenge against his sitting prime minister? No firm hand on the tiller here..

  • 19
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

    My reading of this is that Crean, who in the last leadership challenge was a vocal critic of Rudd, undertook this with full knowledge and backing of the the leadership circle in order to flush Rudd out once and for all, knowing that Rudd didn’t have the numbers and wouldn’t challenge. His recent disquiet was a tactical prelude to this in order to cast him as more sympathetic to Rudd.

  • 20
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    With Rudd declining to contest, Crean’s effort appears to have failed: the incessant speculation over Julia Gillard’s leadership may quiet for a time, but it is likely to eventually resume, with the media having demonstrated they are prepared to continue running leadership stories until parties respond.”

    Who’s governing the country, those who are elected or those who write for ever failing mainstream newspapers?

    Time for the media to remember who they are; to stop playing unelected political representatives and get back to reporting what has happened (NB the past perfect tense…not what may be about to happen).

    But I dream, surely.

  • 21
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    What is it about journalists that they cannot seem to grasp that more than one thing happens in a day? Is it because they focus on one thing at a time, they always carry this absurd concept of “overshadowed by…”?

    I am certain none of the bereaved mothers who had their babies forcibly adopted out felt anything was overshadowed by the ALP leadership spill, as they came together to hear the parliamentary apology. If there was an “overshadowing”, for them it was the faux leadership spill (in which Rudd finally shafted his own supporters) that WAS overshadowed.
    So can we see an end to the concept, the absolute myth of “overshadowing”? People can separate events and sort them out, even if more than one happen in a day!

  • 22
    Person Ordinary
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    Exactly, supermundane.

    Crean’s plan worked perfectly. The Rudd backers outmanoeuvred. No chance of leadership change before the election. The best chance at clear air for actual policy discussion in the media, although still unlikely. A chance, finally, to demand that Tony Abbott is under the spotlight. A good day for Labor.

    All we need now is a united message from all of the factions - all the recent events can be explained by the stakes being raised by the absolutely abhorrent idea of Abbott being allowed to impose his Tea Party idiocy to undo all the brilliant gains made under this hung parliament by a very effective prime minister and some sensible politicians on the cross benches. No spin. No painful media stunts like the Gillard/Rudd meeting after the coup. Just say it like it is - the greatest threat to Australia is an election victory for the far right.

  • 23
    Suzanne Blake
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    Rudd is finished now, never to be PM again. Labor is certain to loose election nw, nothig can save them

  • 24
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    A febrile media indeed (grammatical oxymoron aside) could there have been a better example than the ABC’s hour-long 7.30 report starting at 7.00 and at the expense of things actually newsworthy?

  • 25
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 11:11 pm | Permalink

    If that was Simon Crean being an elder statesman, I see why Labor dumped him as leader without taking the party to an election a decade ago. Even serial loser Bomber Beazley was a better leader than Simple Simon.
    He appears to have pulled the trigger and shot not only himself in the head, but Mr Rudd in the spine as well. And effectively kill off the leadershio issue by mistake.
    I wonder how the mainstream media will manage to fill their papers and news shows now they can’t report the ALP leadership ad nauseum for the next 6 months.
    Might be time to talk about how Turnbull is counting the numbers to roll Abbott. And Barnaby Joyce is getting ready to roll Warren Truss.

  • 26
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    Elected unopposed is a bit like winning a race with no-one else in it.

  • 27
    norm cook
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

    Person Ordinary

    A person with much to be ordinary about…

    Was Crean suffering from temporary insanity or stalking for a devious Julia, in a famous sting of Kevin 07??

    Crean has bravely taken his punishment making the right noises as Julia whups the piano leg instead of his wrinkled ass.

    Are Julia and Simon devious and cunning enough to hatch such a plan?? ……….Probably not.

    Julia’s inept and incompetent handling of a multitude of matters would seem to indicate she would not have the neurones to make all the connections such a sting requires.

    Anyway Simon has done us all a favour - we the people will get to whup her ass in September - a repelling and delicious prospect at the same time.

  • 28
    Posted Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    SBH - do you mean “the likes of Chris Uhlmann’s “bold predictions (re this parliament)” - like the prognostications of so many in the media - don’t matter more than the actual news they’re covering (with their opinion)” …..?

  • 29
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 12:01 am | Permalink

    …. then there was David “The Michelin Man” Feeney, drawn from the shadows, for Lateline (after Q&A Monday) …. looking a little deflated I thought?
    Maybe there was never that much to him in the first place - why he usually operates from where he does?

  • 30
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 12:16 am | Permalink

    Kare Ahearne @ #6 - I will wager that the opinion polls, rather than increase the vote for the Labor party, will dramatically drop to around 25%. There is a big difference between being a strong woman, and exhibiting signs of megalomania. That woman you seem to admire so much is about to preside over the destruction of a once great political party. I, for one, will never forgive her.
    As far as being elected unopposed is concerned - it wouldn’t matter if every single member of the caucus supports that woman, it is of no consequence on election day. You seem to have forgotten that in every poll of VOTERS, Kevin Rudd has double the public support of the megalomaniac, and he is the only member of the current government who may have been able to WIN the election. Be assured, she has just written the death notice of this government, and that will be her enduring legacy.

  • 31
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 12:33 am | Permalink

    We have a government that has kept Australia with one of the most stable and healthy economies in the world, a media that has convinced the constituency to believe that Australia has an unstable government who has wrecked our economy and destroyed our quality of life.
    Unemployment around 5%, inflation around 2%, low official interest rates, low GDP to debt ratio, triple A credit rating from the 3 world agencies
    Italy Greece etc unemployment 20% +, GDP to debt ratio 100% plus. Even the USA has 9-10% unemployment and a debt ratio of 70%.
    Yet the gormless pro right wing continue to compare Aust to these failing economies to Aust….we need an honest media nd Opposition

  • 32
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 12:41 am | Permalink

    While we sink the slipper in to journalists for serving up page after page of leadership speculation, let’s not forget those in the ALP who feed them this stuff. Until the off the record background not for attribution sh-t canning of Julia STOPS we can look forward to more onanistic orgies of self destruction.

  • 33
    David Hand
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 2:30 am | Permalink

    What today’s soap opera shows is that
    a) the media were not making up stories about leadership speculation in the ALP and in spite of Labor’s clear discomfort with leadership questions, there is a real story.

    b) Rudd’s move was so badly staged it certainly was not Rudd’s move. Maybe Gillard’s? with Creane going into effective retirement 6 months before he would have anyway by doing her a favour?

    c) Rudd hasn’t gone anywhere. By keeping his powder dry, he remains an alternative leader still, with a growing number of talented front benchers with him on the back bench.

    d) The spill overshadowed more than the apology to people forcably adopted - it also eclipsed the abject failure of Conroy’s useless media legislation.

    e) The Gillard government has lost all potency in government. If you ever wondered what a lame duck government looks like, this is it.

  • 34
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 6:39 am | Permalink

    Could there be any greater illustration as to why the Labor Party is ruled by the faceless men? Crean puts his hand up publicly to say this is wrong and we need to do something about it and he is banished into oblivion. The great faceless ones sit on their hands and live to fight another day. Who knows how many Obeids are in there pulling the strings and this manifests itself in a classic outcome of leadership forever tilting at windmills.

    Labor is at war with reality. It is the media’s fault. It is Tony Abbott’s fault. It is Rudd’s fault. Crean’s fault. Hopefully one day for the sake of the country Labor will realize the fault with the brand is in the mirror.

    In the meantime someone is waking up this morning with the mantra - ‘My job is safe because no one else wants it’

  • 35
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 7:01 am | Permalink


    Rudd squibbed the challenge just like he squibbed “greatest moral challenge of our lifetime”.

    No one is going to vote for someone who doesn’t even try. Unless you expect the “faceless men” to dump Gillard behind the scenes… which is supposedly what you decry most.

  • 36
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 7:47 am | Permalink

    My Wife works at a very Labor-leaning workplace.

    She said that almost half of the employees have vowed they will spoil their ballots come election day, and just write “Kevin” across the ballots for both houses.

  • 37
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 7:53 am | Permalink

    Alternatively, Rudd refused to rise to the bait that was in fairly plain view. The tactic was similar to that used by the PM last year. Remember, she called on the spill on short notice while KR was in the US. Despite what all the gutless front people are saying, the result was not a “ringing endorsement”, it was a “no contest”. They can say they’re as united as they like, but I doubt such tectonic cracks can be papered over with talking points. But they all know that come election day, they’re in for the mother of all defeats (God help us) and, all misgivings about the Coalition aside, deserve no better.

  • 38
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 7:58 am | Permalink

    Agree with supermndine 17 and Person Ordinary 20.

    Classic chess manouvre Queens Sacrifice however did not get a check mate. Lost the Queen for no real gain. Crean et al tried to force the hand.

    Rudd did well by keeping his word and not challenging.

    Labour do not do themselves any favours. Gangaroo 7 - each and everyone of those phrases (Lest me not repeat them, come they true) turn my stomach. Yet, it seems as if labour are polishing the silver plate for the liberals.

    Norm Cook had to reread your name….

    Achmed 28 - agreed. What can we expect from the coporate owned media that spruik drivel and haver, and who sponser a return of the Liberal (…with the truth, not with policy) Party.

    BTW why are there no reports on yet another gaffe Abbott made with his “apology’? Oh yeah, i just spelled it out… my attention span is apparently shorter than a goldfish

  • 39
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 8:15 am | Permalink

    AJH please. This will not achieve anything. At least get them to vote independant.

  • 40
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 8:16 am | Permalink

    Here, Here Venise and Paddy

  • 41
    Suzanne Blake
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 8:18 am | Permalink

    @ Venise Alstergren

    Venice, next you will be saying their are reds under the beds. Yes there are Reds, they are called the Greens, to confuse you. Did you see Milne interviewed on TV has night with Nick Xenephon. Her communist agenda will drive her vote further down. Laor voters will leak right and Green voters will leak to DLP or KAT

    Venice said BERNARD KEANE: You don’t think there was a hint that Kevin Rudd was backing away from accepting the poisoned chalice? Or is the whole thing a secret deal between Labor and the conservative parties to hand Tony Abbott the leadership of Oz he so desperately craves? If so, why spend all that taxpayers’ money to hold an election? Just give it to the bastards.”

  • 42
    Person Ordinary
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 8:48 am | Permalink

    … once more, for people like David Hand and Savonrepus, who need to learn to read between the lines

    Crean got what he wanted, on behalf of Gillard, whatever the perceived short term cost to himself. It was a noble act.

    Gillard got what she needs, and even if her challenge is insurmountable, she will not flinch.

    Conroy is having his arm twisted by international forces, and was only going through the motions, pretending to do his all to get up some garbage media regulation. He carved it up into six separate pieces hoping for exactly what he got - 2 up, 4 down.

    Abbott will probably win the election, but in the widespread protest that will emerge as he starts to reveal his true agenda the media will be forced to either turn against him, or be pushed aside once and for all. The marriage is based on a short term overlap of self interest, but there will be no honeymoon.

    Jesus, join the dots. And try to appreciate the big picture in the background - Labor can not simply appeal to traditional Labor values because, under the weight of conditioning by commercial media, the public is becoming ever more ignorant, and there are not enough votes to the left of centre to ever achieve a majority. So some of the old time Labor members, like Crean, find it difficult to swallow this continuous drift to the right. Take this together with the impending horror of Tony Abbott in power and you may just comprehend the tensions that force these outcomes.

  • 43
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    Rudd was never going to take on Gillard when all he had to win is an uncomfortable six months before getting slaughtered at the election. Better to rise from the ashes in September and present himself as saviour. Crean’s speach would not have inspired him either - basically being labelled a gutless rat.

  • 44
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 10:07 am | Permalink


    I don’t think any party presently in existence deserves my vote. I can’t in good faith vote for any of them. At this stage, I really don’t care who wins.

    After some thought, I’ve decided my wife’s co-workers are on to something.

    I’ll be spoiling my ballot by writing “Kevin” across it, and I’ll be using my social media presence (a few thousand twitter followers) to begin a website and campaign to get others to do the same.

  • 45
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 10:15 am | Permalink

    Voting independent is fraught with danger too. My local “independent” is actually a former candidate for the CEC. She has previously campaigned to return to the gold standard, in order to “stop the Jews controlling our financial system”. Now, she’s rebranding herself as a “local issues independent”, but anyone who has followed politics over the past few decades knows what her true platform is. Independents are often the worst choice of all.

    Creating a giant fuss and media storm by spoiling ballots en masse is probably the only way to send a message that we’re sick of factionalism, we’re sick of parties reporting to corrupt powerbrokers instead of to the electorate, and we’re sick of the insularity of our current mainstream progressive option.

    If the Labor party gets destroyed, then that’s a fine result. It means another progressive party, less beholden to factions, and less shambolic than the current one, will emerge in its stead.

  • 46
    Peter Gray
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Power Factions vs. Electorate

    My interpretation of events

    Australians have a hung Parliament and the balance of power is held by a few independent MPs. The independents have self-interest at heart and are prepared to play a role in party politics by honouring their existing agreements only with incumbent Labor Party factions rather than the Labor Party as a whole. This approach maintains the threat of a no-confidence motion and increases their leverage with the incumbent government. This leverage is felt by government MPs, who want to sit full term, and it inhibits change, particularly leadership change. This makes things difficult for Rudd supporters to gain the majority in caucus required for leadership change. The incumbent factions are under pressure by the electorate to change their leadership.

    The move by Crean to force a leadership poll yesterday was not a bumbling move by a naive politician, it was a pre-emptive strike while Rudd was lacking a majority of caucus. This is the same basic strategy used a year ago when Rudd was put in an untenable position as Foreign Minister. Crean is busy today with stage two, pushing the Unity and Healing line in the media. He becomes a viable alternative to Gillard. This is handy for the incumbents as the pressure for leadership change is likely to increase with the approaching election.

    The real battle is yet to come. It is between the will of the electorate and the self-interest of power factions & their cohorts. For Australian democracy’s sake I hope the electorate is strong enough to win back the respect of power factions. At present, voters are just poker chips at the casino.

  • 47
    Person Ordinary
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    … interesting view, but don’t you think Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor pretty much accepted they had sealed their fate when they signed up with Gillard, and it was generally thought this was a one term play? That would mean there was no self interest left, and they could get on with trying to push through a positive agenda despite the madness from the Opposition, and it could be easily argued they largely succeeded.

    Also “the will of the electorate” is greatly influenced by the deteriorating quality of the media, not just the deliberate agenda of the commercial media, but also the innocent failure to portray the bigger picture in the wider media, including the ABC and Crikey for that matter. So the media itself is both a punter and the owner of the house, with obvious connotations, and there are more than two sides in play.

  • 48
    Hamis Hill
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Once the cluster jerk-off of pejorativity wears off, the realisation that Gillard has been fighting a tag team of Abbott and Rudd for all this time, will become properly accepted.
    She has done quite well, in the circumstances.
    In the meantime, Leadershit no longer viable, (thankyou honoured party elder), the MSM zombies are now slavering after the “wecked party meme” of Tony Abbott.
    A polity polluted by toxic media incompetence.
    Australia deserves better than this.

  • 49
    Peter Gray
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    Hi Person Ordinary

    … That would mean there was no self interest left,…

    Yes, I think this that a reasonable view of their actions, and perhaps of their intentions, but their self-interest is still in play in supporting the incumbent Labor factions. I take their recent assertion that a Labor leadership change would render their deal open to renegotiation to be a reminder to all MPs that they, the independents, can force an early election.

    Also “the will of the electorate” is greatly influenced by the deteriorating quality of the media,…

    So the media itself is both a punter and the owner of the house, …

    Yes, I agree that the media is influential and that commercial media is inherently commercial. I am reminded of one media mogul’s notion that news publishing is politics. I also think that Auntie ABC’s bias pendulum has been cleverly swung across to the Right via Howard’s anti-bias tactics. IMHO, Auntie is now subtly transforming into commercial media.

    In general, I think that Globalisation and Small Government equals rule by Corporations. I see media corporations as relatively small but vital components of such a system. Don’t get me wrong, if you know a better system than our one based on self-interest then please let us know. I think that our system(s) reflects the electorate, and it is up to the electorate evolve.

    As to the effect of media influence on the electorate, I think that influence is waning somewhat. The credibility gaps between how the public interpret events and the reporting of those events have given readers/viewers good cause to prefer their own judgement.

    The electorate’s preference for Rudd is primarily based on his actions. On several occasions he tried to act on behalf of the electorate. He tried instigate a carbon trading scheme that would, presumably, achieve something more than just benefiting polluters; he provided some insulation to the Global Financial Crisis with a cash injection into bottom of the economy instead of straight into the top (naturally this cash eventually flowed up the economic food-chain); and he tried to create a real resources tax rather than a pretend mining tax. These rarely seen basic pro-electorate actions have not gone unnoticed. Perhaps he wanted change too quickly for the system to cope. I suspect that he is hated like the only cop in a crook town. He has the respect of the town-folk, but it will only be the will of town-folk that create any lasting change for the better.

  • 50
    Person Ordinary
    Posted Friday, 22 March 2013 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    … well said, I generally agree and will respond when I can