Comments on: DLP Senator’s anti-abortion bill likely to have little impact

By: Raaraa

Raaraa — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:46:25 +0000

Is this “s-x” a genotype or some condition? Why is there no mention or reference to what it is?

By: Roger Clifton

Roger Clifton — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:18:48 +0000

I have been told, “oh, there has to be equal numbers of the sexes, so that every young man can dream of marrying a doting wife”.

Depending on the community, his dream might also include a large home shared with ageing elders, childless uncles and aunts and a large group of children sired by him alone. Mostly boys, perhaps. So what’s new?

A larger number of men living among men? That seems only to indicate a population growth under cultural control.

By: mikeb

mikeb — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 04:22:24 +0000

I cannot imagine anyone having an abortion purely because of gender. I know it happens - but I can’t (or don’t want to) imagine it.

By: Venise Alstergren

Venise Alstergren — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:51:07 +0000

Well there’s one preference vote from the DLP to the Liberal Party. Good old John (the blacksmith) Madigan from Ballarat shares with Tony Abbott the hero status of Brian Harradine DLP crook extraordinaire.

The Catholic church-or its mouth organ, the DLP-no sooner gets someone into parliament then the new parliamentarian has to start telling the rest of the community how to fück in bed and how many children the rest of the community should have.

Wait until Tony Abbott gets into power folks, we’ll have censorship of books, the internet, movies, plays, art, and the Royal Commission into the sodomy of children, by Roman Catholic priests, will be defanged.

Minus ten out ten senator John (The blacksmith) Madigan.

By: Roger Clifton

Roger Clifton — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:52:01 +0000

Surely the obvious way to increase the value placed on girl babies in a community is to reduce the supply.

Wasn’t there similar initial reaction against heart transplants, oral contraceptives and horseless carriages?