<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The fight to &#8216;own&#8217; DNA: the case against patents for genes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/22/the-fight-to-own-dna-why-genes-should-not-be-patented/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/22/the-fight-to-own-dna-why-genes-should-not-be-patented/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:12:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogs breakfast</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/22/the-fight-to-own-dna-why-genes-should-not-be-patented/comment-page-1/#comment-238736</link>
		<dc:creator>Dogs breakfast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=350713#comment-238736</guid>
		<description>Universities have the most to gain by NOT locking up genes with patents, so I&#039;m surprised that they argued the obverse.  I suspect it was a smaller but powerful cabal from the &#039;elite&#039; universities that took this line.

But whatever else, it should come back to the basic principal that should be the essence of the law, that being that you can only patent what you have created, not what you found.  

The legal ruminations just bring discredit on that august body, the Law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Universities have the most to gain by NOT locking up genes with patents, so I&#8217;m surprised that they argued the obverse.  I suspect it was a smaller but powerful cabal from the &#8216;elite&#8217; universities that took this line.</p>
<p>But whatever else, it should come back to the basic principal that should be the essence of the law, that being that you can only patent what you have created, not what you found.  </p>
<p>The legal ruminations just bring discredit on that august body, the Law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/22/the-fight-to-own-dna-why-genes-should-not-be-patented/comment-page-1/#comment-238691</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=350713#comment-238691</guid>
		<description>Good to see the other side of the argument put forward. It&#039;s a bit of a cross post but we (Civil Liberties Australia ) have been running a campaign on this with other organisations.
We wrote about the gene patents case last year http://newmatilda.com/2012/07/05/you-are-not-drug

and have a lot more info on our ongoing campaign here: https://www.facebook.com/freegenes
 
There is a Private Members Bill currently in the Labor caucus to ban gene patents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see the other side of the argument put forward. It&#8217;s a bit of a cross post but we (Civil Liberties Australia ) have been running a campaign on this with other organisations.<br />
We wrote about the gene patents case last year <a href="http://newmatilda.com/2012/07/05/you-are-not-drug" rel="nofollow">http://newmatilda.com/2012/07/05/you-are-not-drug</a></p>
<p>and have a lot more info on our ongoing campaign here: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/freegenes" rel="nofollow">https://www.facebook.com/freegenes</a></p>
<p>There is a Private Members Bill currently in the Labor caucus to ban gene patents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 526/535 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2013-05-23 13:14:27 -->