tip off

Bernardi v Fairfax in possible defamation battle

Controversial Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi is fuming about a recent Fairfax article questioning his links to right-wing groups in the US; he is threatening to sue.

Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi is threatening to sue Fairfax Media for defamation over an article suggesting he broke parliamentary rules by failing to declare links to a right-wing United States lobby group.

The controversial senator, who stood down as Tony Abbott’s parliamentary secretary last year after linking gay marriage to bestiality, is fuming about the article, published in The Sun-Herald and The Sunday Age on January 27. Crikey understands Bernardi’s lawyers have issued legal threats to Fairfax and are weighing up how to proceed.

The article, written by federal political correspondent Jessica Wright, stated Bernardi was a member of the American Legislative Exchange Council’s International Relations Task Force. Bernardi and ALEC, which has strong links to the National Rifle Association and tobacco companies, deny this. According to ALEC, Bernardi merely acted as a point of contact for the group in Australia, has never held a leadership position in it and has not received any financial benefit from the organisation.

Wright also claimed the Heartland Institute, a libertarian think tank, had paid for Senator Bernardi’s accommodation and travel to the US on four occasions in 2010 and 2011. Fairfax later issued a correction stating the Institute had paid once for Bernardi’s airfare and twice for accommodation in 2010.

In a speech to Parliament earlier this month, Bernardi described the article as a “gross misrepresentation”, adding it is “now in the hands of my lawyers”.

He also took umbrage at the suggestion his connection to ALEC should have been disclosed on the register of pecuniary interests. Bernardi told Parliament:

I have also been accused of failing to disclose a conflict of interest. This is false. The Clerk of the Senate states in a letter addressed to me: ‘None of the existing declarations under this provision —  that is, the ‘catch-all’ provision regarding conflict of interest —  appear to relate to mere ‘involvement’ with organisations’.”

Bernardi also disputes Wright’s claim —  communicated through her lawyers — that she spoke twice to a woman in his electorate office on Australia Day, the day before publication:

Anyone entering my office is required to deactivate the alarm with a unique code. The South Australia Police, who monitor this alarm, have provided evidence that no access to my office was made on that day. This means that Ms Wright supposedly spoke to a representative in my office who can bypass the SAPOL security system. Perhaps it is the same person that was on the grassy knoll in Dallas nearly 50 years ago.”

In a follow-up article, Wright wrote: “In a letter circulated on Sunday, Senator Bernardi claimed he was not contacted by Fairfax Media before the story was published. But Fairfax Media did contact his office and stands by its story.”

Wright, who is currently on leave, declined Crikey’s requests for comment, as did a Fairfax spokesman. A spokeswoman for Bernadi said: “Senator Bernardi is in discussions with his legal advisers.”

It is unusual, but not unheard of, for sitting politicians to take a defamation case to court. The qualified privilege defence for material relating to “government and political matters” gives journalists greater leeway than on defamatory stories concerning, for example, business figures.

Labor MP Mike Kelly is embroiled in a long-standing legal dispute with Liberal pollster Mark Textor over a 2011 tweet accusing him of “push polling” in the past.

13
  • 1
    Holden Back
    Posted Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    So many disturbing photos of Corey, so little time.

  • 2
    geomac62
    Posted Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    Something missing here . Bernardi talks about his security system but no need to get access if Wright spoke on the phone to a staffer . Isn,t that the norm , ring up ? How is reporting paid for accommodation and trips a gross distortion if one trip is paid for and not three ? Surely a gross distortion of the facts would be to report a trip was paid for and in fact none were ? Another thing I don,t understand is if two different publications ran the story why threaten to sue just one ? To think Bernardi replaced a retiring senator , he was picked by the SA liberals !

  • 3
    Hamis Hill
    Posted Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 6:02 pm | Permalink

    So where is all the foreign “Money” coming from then?
    “Just asking” certainly passes the public interest test!

  • 4
    Hamis Hill
    Posted Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    What ? There is no foreign money then?
    Quelle disappointment!

  • 5
    floorer
    Posted Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    gosh..how beastly for him

  • 6
    Posted Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 9:43 pm | Permalink

    ALEC is also behind many of the laws enforcing, encouraging or allowing the teaching of creationism as science that continue to be spring up like weeds in American state legislatures.

  • 7
    Roberto Tedesco
    Posted Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    Is it too much to hope for that he might on day forget the code to get out of his office?

  • 8
    Hail To The Nihilist
    Posted Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 9:27 am | Permalink

    That’s a bit litigious for a man that bangs on about freedom of speech constantly, isn’t it? He claims it a “gross misrepresentation”. What about your misrepresentation of homosexuality, Cory?

  • 9
    Hamis Hill
    Posted Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    Sueing for defamation might be seen as a sign of weakness and a defence of weakness, especially in politicians who, as the PM’s example shows, are supposed to have a tough hide.
    But this appears to be about legalism, coming from a reliance upon cannons rather than moral cosiderations such as having a backbone and standing up for your position.
    Does it defame the good senator to identify him with the “New Liberals” identified in Gerard Henderson’s book Menzies’ Child?
    A Liberal party deliberately depleted of “Wets” (Real Liberals?) saw Howard seeking the Bernardi types to rebuild the nunbers.
    The Anglican Church, of Howard’s, like Rudd’s, adoption, is “practically the same as the Catholic” quoth Howard.
    “We’re not Menzies protestants anymore, come on over into our broad church” said Howard.
    All leading post- Howard to the religiously inspired overturning of Howard’s “Green house” policies because The Greens are supposedly Gaia worshipping heretics and communists out to destroy “civilisation”?
    The Abbott Putsch built on religious enthusiasms?
    How Menzies’ child has changed indeed, and Bernardi wishes to escape scrutiny?
    If so, what does this tell us about “The New Liberals” that is clearly “IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST” to know, and that,it seems, those so examined do not want the public to know? What is the ultimate agenda having usurped their adopted political party?; is this a question which cannot be asked?
    “All that is evil fears the light”, are we really talking about Christians here?
    “Render unto Caesar what it Caesar’s and render unto God what is God’s” is the scriptural direction which declares religion out of bounds in a secular parliament.
    Seems that Howard broke this rule when he started recruiting his overtly religious “New Liberals”.
    We can thank Henderson for documenting the process and hopefully the public interest clauses of the defamation laws will keep the truth where it should be in the middle of the public debate.
    Remember Tony and Cory, “you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free”.
    Forgive the Bible Bashing, but a certain large number of these conservative politicians claim to be driven by religious sentiment and it is questionable whether that sentiment is actually “Christian” at all.
    “By their action shall ye know them”
    Yes, run Tony and Cory run, run from scrutiny, conspicuously “cloaked” by compliant media “friends”?
    Better get the lawyers to check this one Crikey.

  • 10
    Merve
    Posted Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    Those eyes.

  • 11
    Peter
    Posted Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Oh I see, being wined and dined and acting as a contact point for extremist right wing weirdos is TOTALLY different to being connected to them.

    Typical right wingnut logic.

  • 12
    Lord Barry Bonkton
    Posted Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 6:04 pm | Permalink

    Beastie Boy Cory has a very thin skin ,Free speech ? Where’s Mr.bolt ?

  • 13
    Hamis Hill
    Posted Sunday, 24 February 2013 at 11:36 pm | Permalink

    ABBOTT MINION IN FOREIGN FUNDING SCANDAL
    A fantasy headline (under the present media monopoly).
    But it’s illegal, isn’t it?

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...